Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/133,080

METAL LINE AND VIA BARRIER LAYERS, AND VIA PROFILES, FOR ADVANCED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURE FABRICATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 23, 2020
Examiner
KIM, JAHAE
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
31 granted / 41 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
66
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 41 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 12/10/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding the arguments on pages 7-12, Shin (US20220037287A1) teaches the single, nitrogen-free tantalum (Ta) barrier layer has a concave bottom surface at the bottom of the conductive via (para [0074-0076], recessed portion 403R of the barrier layer 403R). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin (US20220037287A1), and further in view of Cheng (US6086777A). Regarding claim 1, Shin teaches an integrated circuit structure (Fig. 10, semiconductor device 1A), comprising: a first conductive interconnect line (pad layer 303) in a first inter-layer dielectric (ILD) layer (first dielectric layer 103) above a substrate (first substrate 101), the first conductive line having a cobalt fill (para [0052], conductive material, copper alloy which contains cobalt); a second conductive interconnect line (upper portion 405U of the filler layer 405) in a second ILD layer above the first inter­layer dielectric (ILD) layer (bonding layer 105); and a conductive via coupling the first conductive interconnect line and the second conductive interconnect line (recessed portion 405R), wherein the second conductive interconnect line and the conductive via comprise a copper fill (para [0080-0081], conductive material, copper) directly on a single, nitrogen-free tantalum (Ta) barrier layer (para [0075], barrier layer 403 is formed of tantalum), and wherein the single, nitrogen-free tantalum (Ta) barrier layer is directly on the cobalt fill of the first conductive line (Fig. 10), and wherein the single, nitrogen-free tantalum (Ta) barrier layer has a concave bottom surface at the bottom of the conductive via (para [0074-0076], recessed portion 403R of the barrier layer 403R). But does not specify wherein the single, nitrogen-free tantalum (Ta) barrier layer has a thickness a bottom of the conductive via greater than a thickness along a side of the conductive via. However, Cheng teaches the single, nitrogen-free tantalum (Ta) barrier layer has a thickness along a bottom of the conductive via greater than a thickness along a side of the conductive via (Fig. 10, tantalum barrier layer 32 has a thickness along a bottom of the conductive layer 34 greater than a thickness along a side of the conductive layer 34). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device of Shin (US20220037287A1) by further integrating the method of etching tantalum disposed over a dielectric layer disclosed by Cheng (US6086777A). The combination of these familiar elements can improve the circuit density and increase speeds of semiconductor devices (Cheng, Col. 1, lines 25-30). PNG media_image1.png 787 560 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin (US20220037287A1) in view of Cheng (US6086777A) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Cheng546 (US20200058546A1). Regarding claim 2, Shin in view of Cheng teaches the integrated circuit structure of claim 1, but does not disclose single, nitrogen-free tantalum (Ta) barrier layer has a thickness in a range of 1-5 nanometers. However, Cheng546 teaches the single, nitrogen-free tantalum (Ta) barrier layer has a thickness in a range of 1-5 nanometers (Chang 546 disclosed in Para [0042] and Fig. 13, diffusion barrier layer 242 is embedded within the etch stop layer 210, which has a thickness of less than 3 nm. Therefore, the thickness of element 242 is also less than 3 nm). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device of Shin (US20220037287A1) by further integrating the method of manufacturing an IC device disclosed by Cheng546 (US20200058546A1). The combination of these familiar elements can reduce the parasitic capacitance and increase the operation speed of the ICs (Cheng546, para [0047]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAHAE KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-1844. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fernando Toledo can be reached at (571) 271-1867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FERNANDO L TOLEDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897 /JAHAE KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2020
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2021
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 16, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 24, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12446412
DISPLAY DEVICE AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 14, 2025
Patent 12356873
METHOD OF FORMING CHALCOGENIDE-BASED THIN FILM USING ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION PROCESS, METHOD OF FORMING PHASE CHANGE MATERIAL LAYER AND SWITCHING DEVICE, AND METHOD OF FABRICATING MEMORY DEVICE USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 08, 2025
Patent 12347776
INTEGRATED CHIP WITH GRAPHENE BASED INTERCONNECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 01, 2025
Patent 12336197
IN-PLANE INDUCTORS IN IC PACKAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 17, 2025
Patent 12328876
THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 10, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+17.2%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 41 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month