Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/180,812

AIR eCommerce

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 21, 2021
Examiner
BELOUSOV, ANDREY
Art Unit
2172
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Anuthep Benja-Athon
OA Round
8 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
9-10
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
413 granted / 596 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
630
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
76.9%
+36.9% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 596 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the filing of 4/6/26. Claims 124-132 are pending and have been considered below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 124-132 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Claims 124-132 recite using AIR eCommerce, but the specification provides very little coherent information. The specification needs to provide information to one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention, but it does not meet this standard. However, if the Applicant needs more guidance, the Applicant may call the Examiner for further explanation (or schedule an interview.) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 124-132 are rejected as failing to define the invention in the manner required by 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. The claim(s) are narrative in form and replete with indefinite language. The structure which goes to make up the device must be clearly and positively specified. The structure must be organized and correlated in such a manner as to present a complete operative device. Furthermore, acronyms: ipMAC, ASD need to be spelled out on first usage in the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREY BELOUSOV whose telephone number is (571) 270-1695 and Andrew.belousov@uspto.gov email. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Queler, can be reached at telephone number 571-272-4140. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center and the Private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center or Private PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center and Private PAIR for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /Andrey Belousov/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2145 4/18/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 14 earlier events
Oct 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 27, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12632170
METHODS FOR INTERACTING WITH USER INTERFACES BASED ON ATTENTION
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12613715
DYNAMIC MANAGEMENT OF DISPLAY CONTENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12602533
CONTENT GENERATION WITH INTEGRATED AUTOFORMATTING IN WORD PROCESSORS THAT DEPLOY LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585372
GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SYSTEM GUIDE MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586829
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING ROLL MAP AND MANUFACTURING BATTERY USING ROLL MAP
11m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+26.7%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 596 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month