Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Anuthep Benja-Athon holds 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 3 actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This distribution shows that pending matters are being handled by 3 distinct examiners in 3 distinct art units, creating a diverse set of prosecution environments for the portfolio. Such a spread suggests that the company is pursuing multiple mechanical or e-commerce innovations simultaneously.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is RAPILLO, KRISTINE K, who has 1 pending office action. Since the busiest examiner pending count is 1, the workload is distributed across the 3 distinct examiners. This lack of concentration means that prosecution strategies may need to be tailored individually for each of the 3 art units involved, as there is no overlap in personnel or examining groups for the 3 pending actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAPILLO, KRISTINE K | 1 | 29.0% | +27.1% |
| BELOUSOV, ANDREY | 1 | 69.2% | +26.8% |
| ABRISHAMKAR, KAVEH | 1 | 78.1% | +17.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18831285 | Untitled | RAPILLO, KRISTINE K | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15495164 | Abiotic Intelligent-Rendered Oracle | ABRISHAMKAR, KAVEH | 24d overdue |
| 17180812 | AIR eCommerce | BELOUSOV, ANDREY | 53d |
| 18831285 | Untitled | RAPILLO, KRISTINE K | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3682 | 1 |
| 2172 | 1 |
| 2494 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18831285 | Untitled | RAPILLO, KRISTINE K | 3682 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 15, 2024 |
| 17180812 | AIR eCommerce | BELOUSOV, ANDREY | 2172 | §112 | Final Rejection | 53d | Pending | Feb 21, 2021 |
| 15495164 | Abiotic Intelligent-Rendered Oracle | ABRISHAMKAR, KAVEH | 2494 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 24d overdue | Pending | Apr 24, 2017 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial