Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/241,498

DETECTION OF A PILOT SEQUENCE ON SIMPLE COMPUTING DEVICES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 27, 2021
Examiner
KWOH, JASPER C
Art Unit
2415
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Diehl Metering GmbH
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
131 granted / 209 resolved
+4.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
241
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 209 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/24/2025 has been entered. Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: the “and” for the list of wherein clauses is in the wrong location. The “and” should be placed before the last wherein clause. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 20 recites the limitation "each… effects that the pilot signal is located" in line 27. The functional relationship between each of the binary sequences and the pilot signal is unclear. Please double check whether the “that” should be changed to “where” and “effects” to “affects” for clarity. Also, it is unclear what element or feature is the noun/subject for the newly added limitation of “by mapping…” as it may be describing how each of the binary sequences affects, how the pilot signal is located, or some other element or feature. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 and 12-19 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Applicant’s arguments are persuasive. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jasper Kwoh whose telephone number is (408)918-7644. The examiner can normally be reached Tuesday through Friday, 10am to 4pm Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Rutkowski can be reached at (571) 270-1215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASPER KWOH/Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2415
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 27, 2021
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 29, 2024
Response Filed
May 01, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 07, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 06, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 12, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 12, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 24, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 31, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592877
PACKET FLOW IN A CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE BASED ON CACHED AND NON-CACHED CONFIGURATION INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574167
TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIDELINK REFERENCE SIGNAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574158
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FEEDING BACK HARQ-ACK IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557079
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR DETERMINING AND ALLOCATING RESOURCES, AND TERMINAL AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12531779
AVAILABILITY-ENHANCING GATEWAYS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC IN VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 209 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month