Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/269,599

COMPOSITION AND MULTILAYER BODY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 19, 2021
Examiner
CAI, WENWEN
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Daikin Industries Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
509 granted / 850 resolved
-5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
74 currently pending
Career history
924
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment of claim 1 is supported by the specification. Any rejections and/or objections made in the previous Office action and not repeated below are hereby withdrawn. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The new grounds of rejection set forth below are necessitated by applicant's amendment filed on 6/26/2025. Thus, the following action is properly made final. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shioya et al (JP2016166288). Claim 1, 3-5: Shioya teaches a composition comprising a fluoropolymer, a solvent, and an inorganic filler, such as a carbon fiber [0008, 0095]. The fluoropolymer can be tetrafluoroethylene/vinylpyrrolidone copolymer (TFE/VP=50:50) [0111]. It is noted that instant specification does not define or exemplify a positive electrode active material. While both the prior arts cited in the background and applicant’s argument disclose carbon filler is a positive electrode active material. Therefore, the carbon fiber also reads on the positive electrode active material, and instant claim does not distinguish the inorganic filler and the electrode active material. Shioya does not expressly name a single embodiment having the claimed composition. However, each of the components of the composition is described in the reference. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the present invention to have made any of the compositions suggested by the reference, including the claimed composition, thereby arriving at the presently claimed invention. Claim 2: Shioya teaches the filler in an amount of 0.1-25wt% based on the fluoropolymer [0095]. Case law holds that in the case where the claimed ranges “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art” a prima facie case of obviousness exists. In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976); In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 16 USPQ2d 1934 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Claims 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shioya et al (JP2016166288) in view of Sekiya et al (JP2011068709). Shioya teaches the limitation of claim 1, as discussed above. Shioya further teaches the composition can be used to make optical films [0102]. Shioya does not teach the filler includes a carbon nanotube. However, Sekiya discloses an optical film and teaches the carbon fiber used can be carbon nanotubes or carbon nanofibers (p7-8). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to utilize carbon nanotube in the composition of Shioya for preparing optical films because it is recognized in the art that carbon nanotube is a suitable carbon fiber for optical films. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/26/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant's argument that the inorganic filler and the electrode active material are separate and distinct components, the argument is not persuasive because 1) neither instant specification nor claims define or exemplify the positive electrode active material; 2) neither instant specification nor claims distinguish the inorganic filler and the electrode active material; 3) prior arts cited in the background and applicant’s argument disclose carbon filler is a positive electrode active material; 4) given the broadest reasonable interpretation, the carbon fiber also reads on the positive electrode active material. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WENWEN CAI whose telephone number is (571)270-3590. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached on (571)272-1302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WENWEN CAI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2021
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 17, 2024
Interview Requested
Apr 26, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 26, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
May 20, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 25, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 19, 2024
Interview Requested
Sep 25, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 25, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 24, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 25, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 31, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 31, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600886
RESINS FOR ADHESIVE BONDING OF FABRICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590201
DEGRADATION PROMOTER FOR ALIPHATIC POLYESTER BIODEGRADABLE RESIN, BIODEGRADABLE RESIN COMPOSITION, AND METHOD FOR PROMOTING DEGRADATION OF ALIPHATIC POLYESTER BIODEGRADABLE RESIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12559592
BRANCHED AMORPHOUS POLYAMIDE (CO)POLYMERS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552956
PHOTOPOLYMERIZABLE TYPE DENTAL SURFACE COATING COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12534556
CURABLE COMPOSITION, CURED ARTICLE USING SAME, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CURED ARTICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+19.8%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month