Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/272,067

TREATING A WIND TURBINE DRIVE TRAIN

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 26, 2021
Priority
Sep 06, 2018 — EU 18193054.6 +1 more
Examiner
LAUGHLIN, CHARLES S
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy S.A.
OA Round
6 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
295 granted / 384 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
424
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
76.4%
+36.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 384 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Damgaard et al. (US 2007/0036655) in view of Pederson et al. (US 2015/0300319) and Mikhail et al. (US 2002/0105189). Regarding claim 1, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): A method of treating a bearing system (Fig. 3B) comprised in a wind turbine drive train (Fig. 5, 3) during storage and/or transport (¶0079-¶0083), the drive train comprising a rotor (Fig. 4, 5) coupled to a generator (21, coupled in Fig. 5), the method comprising about at least one half revolution or at least one revolution (¶0100-¶0107, rotation, ¶0121- ¶0122), to the generator when the generator together with the drive train is stored or transported (¶0113) They do not disclose: controlling the generator to operate as a motor to deliver a driving torque causing the rotor to rotate wherein the controlling the generator comprises: supplying a driving power stream from an auxiliary converter system wherein the auxiliary converter system is electrically coupled to the generator. However, Pederson teaches (fig. 1): controlling the generator (Fig. 1, 4) to operate as a motor (¶0039) to deliver a driving torque causing the rotor (6) to rotate (¶0039-¶0040) Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein the controlling the generator comprises: supplying a driving power stream from an auxiliary converter system (Fig. 6B, 624) wherein the auxiliary converter system (624) is electrically coupled to the generator (620, ¶0081). Regarding claim 1, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 2, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein by rotating the rotor at least one roller and/or ball (Fig. 3b, 11) is moved relative to a raceway (13) of at least one component of the bearing system (Fig. 3B, ¶0082-¶0083), and/or wherein the generator generated driving torque continuously and/or in a stepwise manner and/or in a back and forth manner rotates the rotor during at least 20%, in particular between 50% and 100%, of the transport time and/or storage time (¶0121-¶0123). Regarding claim 3, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein the generator generated driving torque rotates the rotor with a predetermined rotational speed, between 0.1 rpm and 5 rpm (¶0121-¶0123), Regarding claim 4, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein the auxiliary system (Fig. 4, 14) exclusively supplies driving power to the generator (¶0095-¶0104). Regarding claim 5, Damgaard discloses the above elements from claim 1. They do not disclose: wherein the auxiliary converter system comprises an auxiliary frequency converter which is powered by an external power supply, wherein a three phase AC power stream having a predetermined frequency of 50 Hz or 60 Hz is supplied to the auxiliary frequency converter However, Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein the auxiliary converter system comprises an auxiliary frequency converter (Fig. 6B, 624) which is powered by an external power supply (from grid), wherein a three phase AC power stream having a predetermined frequency of 50 Hz or 60 Hz is supplied to the auxiliary frequency converter (grid frequency is 60Hz, ¶0007) Regarding claim 5, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 6, Damgaard discloses the above elements from claim 5. They do not disclose: wherein the auxiliary frequency converter comprises controllable switches connected between DC-terminals at an input section and comprises further controllable switches connected between DC- terminals at an output section, wherein conductance states of the controllable switches and the further controllable switches are controlled by an auxiliary converter controller supplying control signals to gates of the controllable switches and the further controllable switches. However, Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein the auxiliary frequency converter comprises controllable switches (IGBTS not shown, ¶0095) connected between DC-terminals at an input section and comprises further controllable switches connected between DC-terminals at an output section (2 inverters connected between DC Bus 631), wherein conductance states of the controllable switches and the further controllable switches are controlled by an auxiliary converter controller supplying control signals to gates of the controllable switches and the further controllable switches (¶0095-¶0096). Regarding claim 6, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 7, Damgaard discloses the above elements from claim 1. They do not disclose: wherein the auxiliary converter system or comprises at least one wind turbine converter connectable to the generator and used during normal operation of the wind turbine, to convert a variable frequency power stream, generated by the generator due to wind impacting on rotor blade connected to the rotor, to a substantially fixed frequency power stream to be delivered to a utility grid, wherein the auxiliary converter system has a capacity of between 1% and 20% of a capacity of each wind turbine converter However, Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein the auxiliary converter system comprises at least one wind turbine converter (Fig. 6B, 624, 630) connectable to the generator (620) and used during normal operation of the wind turbine, to convert a variable frequency power stream (¶0100), generated by the generator due to wind impacting on rotor blade connected to the rotor (¶0100), to a substantially fixed frequency power stream to be delivered to a utility grid, wherein the auxiliary converter system has a capacity of between 1% and 20% of a capacity of each wind turbine converter (90158). Regarding claim 7, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 8, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein the bearing system (Fig. 3b) comprises at least one of: a primary and/or secondary rotor main bearing (¶0082); a gear box bearing (¶0086-¶0087); and a generator bearing (Fig. 3b, ¶0016-¶0017). Regarding claim 9, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein the method is performed during transport of a nacelle loaded on a transport frame (¶0018-¶0019), the nacelle (Fig. 4, 3) comprising the generator (21), the rotor (5), the drive train (16, 17, 18, 19, 20) and the bearing system (part of rotor and generator, Fig. 3b), an auxiliary converter system being arranged in or at the nacelle or at the transport frame (everything arranged in transport frame, ¶0018-¶0019). Regarding claim 10, Damgaard discloses the above elements from claim 1. They do not disclose: wherein the nacelle further comprises: at least one wind turbine converter in case of a multiple winding set generator, each one of the wind turbine converters connectable to the generator. However, Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein the nacelle further comprises: at least one wind turbine converter (Fig. 6B, 624, 630) in case of a multiple winding set generator (620), each one of the wind turbine converters connectable to the generator (both converters connected, ¶0081). Regarding claim 10, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 11, Damgaard discloses the above elements from claim 1. They do not disclose: wherein each one of the wind turbine converters is connectable to the generator via a respective generator breaker, wherein during the method generator breakers are opened. However, Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein each one of the wind turbine converters is connectable to the generator via a respective generator breaker, wherein during the method generator breakers are opened (¶0042). Regarding claim 11, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 12, Damgaard discloses the above elements from claim 1. They do not disclose: wherein the generator is a single winding set generator or a multiple winding set generator, wherein in case of a multiple winding set generator, the auxiliary converter system is connected to only one winding set of the generator. However, Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein the generator is a single winding set generator or a multiple winding set generator (Fig. 2, ¶0006), wherein in case of a multiple winding set generator, the auxiliary converter system is connected to only one winding set of the generator (each converter is connected to one set, ¶0006). Regarding claim 12, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 13, Damgaard discloses the above elements from claim 1. They do not disclose: wherein the generator is a permanent magnet synchronous generator, having an outer rotor with plural permanent magnets, or an induction generator. However, Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein the generator is a permanent magnet synchronous generator, having an outer rotor with plural permanent magnets, or an induction generator (¶0005). Regarding claim 13, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 14, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): A method of storing and/or transporting a wind turbine arrangement comprising a drive train (Fig.4 all elements) with a rotor (5), a generator (21, coupled in Fig. 5) coupled to the rotor (5), a bearing system rotatably supporting at least one component of the drive train (not shown, Fig. 3b, ¶0082-¶0084), and an auxiliary converter system (14, ¶0100-¶0107, rotation, ¶0121-¶0122), comprising about at least one half revolution or at least one revolution (¶0100-¶0107, rotation, ¶0121-¶0122) during the storing and/or the transporting (¶0118-¶0121), to the generator when the generator together with the drive train is stored or transported (¶0113), They do not disclose: controlling the generator to operate as a motor to deliver a driving torque causing the rotor to rotate wherein the controlling the generator comprises: supplying a driving power stream from an auxiliary converter system wherein the auxiliary converter system is electrically coupled to the generator. However, Pederson teaches (fig. 1): controlling the generator (Fig. 1, 4) to operate as a motor (¶0039) to deliver a driving torque causing the rotor (6) to rotate (¶0039-¶0040) Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): wherein the controlling the generator comprises: supplying a driving power stream from an auxiliary converter system (Fig. 6B, 624) wherein the auxiliary converter system (624) is electrically coupled to the generator (620, ¶0081). Regarding claim 14, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 15, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): An arrangement for treating a bearing system (Fig. 3b) comprised in a wind turbine drive train (Fig. 5, all elements) during storage and/or transport (¶0079-¶0083), the drive train comprising a rotor (5) coupled to a generator (21, coupled in Fig. 5), the arrangement comprising: a nacelle (3) and; for supplying a driving power stream to the generator when the generator together with the drive train is stored or transported (¶0113), causing the rotor to rotate about at least one revolution (¶0100-¶0107, rotation, ¶0121-¶0122); They do not disclose: an auxiliary converter electrically coupled to the generator To control the generator to operate as a motor to deliver a driving torque causing the rotor to rotate However, Pederson teaches (fig. 1): to control the generator (Fig. 1, 4) to operate as a motor (¶0039) such that the generator (4) delivers a driving torque causing the rotor (6) to rotate (¶0039-¶0040) Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): an auxiliary converter system (Fig. 6B, 624) electrically coupled to the generator (620, ¶0081) Regarding claim 15 it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 16, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein the rotor is caused to rotate about more than 100 revolutions (¶0121-¶0122, could rotate indefinitely). Regarding claim 17, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein the rotor is caused to rotate about more than 1000 revolutions (¶0121-¶0122, could rotate indefinitely). Regarding claim 18, Damgaard discloses the above elements from claim 1. They do not disclose: further comprising: in a motor mode, supplying a driving power stream to the generator so the generator operates as the motor; and in a generator mode, operating the generator to convert rotational energy of the rotor into electric energy. However, Pederson teaches: further comprising:in a motor mode, supplying a driving power stream to the generator so the generator operates as the motor (¶0039-¶0040); Mikhail teaches (Fig. 6B): and in a generator mode, operating the generator to convert rotational energy of the rotor into electric energy (¶0057). Regarding claim 18, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to take the turbine transport apparatus from Damgaard that turns a rotor of a generator in order to keep the bearings lubricated (¶0119-¶0121) and send power to the generator of the wind turbine to turn the rotor in order to enable a smooth start up as taught by Pederson (¶0039-¶0040). This would reduce costs by not needing an extra unit to turn the generator and also protects the bearings which would increase reliability. It would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the wind turbine transportation apparatus from Damgaard that uses a generator to turn the rotor of the turbine with the assistance of an auxiliary unit during transit (¶0097, ¶0107) and use a converter to drive the rotor of a generator of a wind turbine as taught by Mikhail (¶0007). This would enable the rotor to rotate during transit to prevent wear and tear as taught by Damgaard (¶0097, ¶0107). Regarding claim 19, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein the generator electrically coupled to the auxiliary converter system (14) is decoupled and disconnected from all other circuitries to which the generator is connected during normal operation while producing electric energy (10098).¶ Regarding claim 20, Damgaard discloses (Fig. 3B): wherein controlling the generator to operate as the motor does not require mechanically coupling any auxiliary device to rotating components of the drive train (¶0115). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/22/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding applicant’s arguments pertaining to claims 1-20, applicant argues that the combination of Damgaard in view of Pederson is improper because Damgaard teaches away from Pederson’s high torque generator as a motor a approach and that the high speed from using the generator as a motor would rupture the oil film, however, this is not claimed, furthermore, in ¶0039, Pederson teaches how a high static friction needs to be overcome and this could be used instead of a separate motor unit as shown from Damgaard. Furthermore, it is known to operate a motor and generator differently during a startup state and a steady state, during startup one would need to overcome static friction then a slow motoring mode could be used. Damgaard As such, the combination is proper because this would reduce the amount of components needed to turn the turbine during transit which would reduce costs. Applicant also argues that none of the reference teach how a generator operates as a motor during storage or transport but viewed as a whole combination, since Pederson’s generator is used as a motor to move the turbine when its being installed, that would be nearly equivalent to transport without the blades. Furthermore, the combination of Damgaard in view of Pederson and Mikhail is proper because although Applicant is arguing combining the references teaches away from Damgaard, for example, that a special low frequency inverter would be required, the Pedersen reference would be able to accomplish this task by actuating the motor as a generator at low speed which is taught in ¶0043 from Pedersen. The generator from Pederson operating in a motoring mode would teach this aspect. As such, examiner is maintaining the rejections for claims 1-20. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES S LAUGHLIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7244. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at (571) 272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.S.L./ Examiner, Art Unit 2837 /KAWING CHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Nov 19, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 19, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 22, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676570
A MISSILE SERVO ACTUATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A SERVO ACTUATION SYSTEM IN A MISSILE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676569
CONTROL SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC CURRENT LIMITS ON A ROTATING ELECTRICAL MACHINE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665529
METHOD FOR CONTROLLED MOTOR SPEED REDUCTION AND MECHANISM FOR CONTROLLING MOTOR SPEED REDUCTION
6y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12649374
POWER STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643412
DEPLOYABLE RESISTOR TO DISSIPATE POWER DURING REGENERATIVE BRAKING FOR ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.6%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 384 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month