Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/432,278

METHOD OF PRODUCING A BIOACTIVE SURFACE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 20, 2023
Priority
Feb 28, 2019 — GB 1902702.8 +1 more
Examiner
SALAMON, PETER A
Art Unit
1765
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
718 granted / 831 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
849
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
66.2%
+26.2% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 831 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1, 3 – 7, 9 – 11, 13, 15 – 16 and 18 in the reply filed on 12/5/25 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9 – 11, 13 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. A broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claims 9 – 11 and 13 recite a broad range, and the claim also recites a narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Regarding claims 9 – 11 and 13, the phrase "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Regarding claim 18, the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3 – 6 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by the NPL titled Therapeutic nanoworms: towards novel synthetic dendritic cells for immunotherapy, Mandal et al., Chemical Science, 2013, 4, 4168, hereinafter Mandal. Mandal is directed to a new class of antibody functionalized, semi-flexible, filamentous polymer (Abstract). Regarding claims 1, 3 – 6 and 16, Mandal teaches at Scheme 1 the formation of a polymer comprising nanofilaments where each nanofilament has a different functional group. See Scheme 1 reproduced below. PNG media_image1.png 750 959 media_image1.png Greyscale The first function group is an azide, the second functional group is an alkoxy group. See step c, 3 above. In the final step, the amide coupled with BCN-NHS (5) to form a SAv group (streptavidin) functional polyisocyano peptides. The alph CD (cyclodextrin) – SAv is used in the synthesis (page 4170, column 2, line 1). Alpha CD is a cyclic saccharide. Streptavidin is a biomolecule attached to the polyisocyano peptide polymer. Prior Art of Record Therapeutic nanoworms: towards novel synthetic dendritic cells for immunotherapy, Mandal et al., Chemical Science, 2013, 4, 4168 (Year: 2013) Supplementary Information - Therapeutic nanoworms: towards novel synthetic dendritic cells for immunotherapy (Year: 2013) EP-2826493 A1 Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER A. SALAMON whose telephone number is 571-270-3018. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9AM - 6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PAS 5/30/26 /PETER A SALAMON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679954
LIGHT-TRANSMISSIVE FILM, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667645
Ionic Polymers for Medical Device Applications
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668682
CURABLE COMPOSITION CONTAINING RICE HUSK ASH BIOSILICA TOUGHENED EPOXY RESIN
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662601
CLEAR COATING ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITIONS, METHODS OF PREPARATION, AND USES THEREOF FOR CONFERRING ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY TO A SURFACE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655286
GRAFTED POLYMER AND USE THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 831 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month