Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum has 4 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, showing a diverse prosecution landscape for the institution. This spread indicates that the university's patent applications are being evaluated by different technical specialists across multiple departments at the patent office.

SHIN, DANA H is the busiest examiner, currently managing 1 pending office action. With 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for 1 action. This distribution across 3 distinct art units indicates that the university's patent matters are being reviewed by multiple specialists across several technical groups. For practitioners, this implies a need to monitor for potential inconsistencies in examiner behavior across the 3 distinct art units while managing the 4 pending office actions to ensure a cohesive strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHIN, DANA H 1 27.0% +27.0%
DAVID, SHAUN L 1 72.8% +19.5%
HAN, ROBIN 1 33.8% +61.8%
FERNANDEZ, SUSAN EMILY 1 52.5% +60.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18258814 Expandable plug DAVID, SHAUN L 13d
18571755 Allele-specific silencing therapy for DFNA21 using antisense oligonucleotides SHIN, DANA H —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17922987 VAGINAL DEVICE FOR PROLAPSE TREATMENT HAN, ROBIN 111d overdue
17546089 Method for ex vivo expansion CD34+HSPCs into NK cells using an aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist FERNANDEZ, SUSAN EMILY 86d overdue
18258814 Expandable plug DAVID, SHAUN L 13d
18571755 Allele-specific silencing therapy for DFNA21 using antisense oligonucleotides SHIN, DANA H —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 1
3786 1
1651 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18571755 Allele-specific silencing therapy for DFNA21 using antisense oligonucleotides SHIN, DANA H — §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2023
18258814 Expandable plug DAVID, SHAUN L 3771 §102§103 Final Rejection 13d Pending Jun 22, 2023
17922987 VAGINAL DEVICE FOR PROLAPSE TREATMENT HAN, ROBIN 3786 §103 Final Rejection 111d overdue Pending Nov 03, 2022
17546089 Method for ex vivo expansion CD34+HSPCs into NK cells using an aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist FERNANDEZ, SUSAN EMILY 1651 §103 Non-Final OA 86d overdue Pending Dec 09, 2021

Managing Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month