Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/433,041

ARRAY SUBSTRATE, HAVING AN ISOLATON PILLAR IN A HOLE BORDER AREA, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 23, 2021
Examiner
DYKES, LAURA M
Art Unit
2892
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Boe Technology Group Co., LTD.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

65%
Career Allow Rate
321 granted / 497 resolved
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
41 pending
538
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This OA is in response to the amendment filled on 5/26/2025 that has been entered, wherein claims 1-9, 12-13, 15, 18-19 and 21-24 are pending, claims 10-11, 14, 16-17, 20 are canceled and claims 1-8 are withdrawn. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 5/26/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9, 12-13, 15, 18-19 and 21-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 9 recites the limitation "a photoresist material " in line 28. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Is the photoresist material of line 28 the same or different then the “material of the support portion that is a photoresist” in lines 26- 27? For the purpose of examination, “the support portion is a photoresist material” in line 28 will be interpreted as “the material of the support portion that is the photoresist, is a photoresist material”. Claims 12-13, 15 and 18-19 depend on claim 9 and inherit it’s deficiencies. Claim 21 recites the limitation "a photoresist material " in line 22. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Is the photoresist material of line 22 the same or different then the “material of the support portion that is a photoresist” in line 21-22? For the purpose of examination, “a material of the support portion is a photoresist, and the support portion is a photoresist material” in line 22 will be interpreted as “a material of the support portion is a photoresist material”. Claims 22-24 depend on claim 21 and inherit it’s deficiencies. Claim 24 recites the limitation "the fourth metal layer" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of examination, “the fourth metal layer” in line 22 will be interpreted as “a fourth metal layer”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9, 12-13, 15, 18-19 and 21-24 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAURA DYKES whose telephone number is (571)270-3161. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30 am-5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, N. Drew Richards can be reached at 571-272-1736. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA M DYKES/Examiner, Art Unit 2892
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2021
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2021
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 08, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Aug 23, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 27, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 30, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 03, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 03, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
May 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 29, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12599024
DISPLAY MODULE AND SUBSTRATE THEREOF HAVING IMPROVED BINDING RELIABILITY OF SUBSTRATE AND FLEXIBLE CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588376
Substrate Arrangement and Manufacturing Method for a Micro Display
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564039
DOPING PROCESSES IN METAL INTERCONNECT STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557410
Bio-Inspired Imaging Device with In-Sensor Visual Adaptation
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12557417
IMAGE SENSOR INCLUDING A GROUND REGION SHARED BY PIXELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+27.9%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner