Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/451,085

Cooling device for cooling an energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly and method of manufacturing the same

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 15, 2021
Priority
Apr 26, 2019 — DE 10 2019 110 870.5 +1 more
Examiner
MELFI, OLIVIA MASON
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Liebherr-Components Biberach GmbH
OA Round
4 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
26 granted / 40 resolved
At TC average
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
79
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
92.4%
+52.4% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 40 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is responsive to the April 21st, 2026 arguments and remarks (“Remarks”). Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendments In response to the amendments received in the Remarks on April 21st, 2026: Claims 1, 3-8, 10-11, and 13-29 are pending in the current application. Claims 1, 7, 14-17, and 20-21 have been amended. Claims 22-29 stand withdrawn. Claims 2, 9, and 12 have been cancelled. The previous rejection under 35 USC 112 is overcome in light of the amendment. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed with the Remarks on April 21st, 2026 with respect to Claims 1, 3-8, 10-11, and 13-21 are acknowledged, however, Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive. Applicant’s argument that the prior art of record fails to disclose the instantly claimed cooling device is not persuasive. Applicant’s argument that the prior art fails to disclose wherein the first heat sink and the second heat sink each comprise connection surfaces shaped-adapted to connection poles of the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly, and wherein the connection surfaces comprise bore- and/or hole-like recesses shape-adapted to pin-like protruding connection journals of a battery and/or a capacitor is not persuasive. A person having ordinary skill in the art would recognize that the cooling device of Taylor reads on the instant claim limitation. As shown in figure 2 (annotated below), each of the first heat sink and second heat sink comprise a clamp 50/60 that are fastened together via positioning fasteners/threaded screws 54 ([0014]). Further, Taylor defines that these clamps each have a convex shape and solely connect with the peripheral part of the heat sinks 30/40 ([0014]), thus creating a hollow shape (reading on the instantly claimed bore- and/or hole-like shape) adapted to accommodate the space for the electronics assembly 10 which includes the protruding pedestals 32/42 ([0022]-[0023]), wire bonds/solder bump connections ([0017]), and circuit connections 24 ([0016]). PNG media_image1.png 853 1399 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 2 of Taylor Therefore, Applicant’s argument is not persuasive and the rejection of record is maintained. Any modification to the rejection is as necessitated by the amendment. Prior Art Previously cited Taylor US PG Publication 2007/0097627 (“Taylor”) Previously cited Guidat US Patent 7,044,207 (“Guidat”) Previously cited Kopp US PG Publication 2017/0263987 (“Kopp”) Previously cited Gradinger US PG Publication 2013/0077245 (“Gradinger”) Previously cited Sayir US PG Publication 2007/0053168 (“Sayir”) Previously cited Leah US PG Publication 2016/0380298 (“Leah”) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office Action. Claims 1, 7, 10-11, 14-17, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Taylor US PG Publication 2007/0097627 in view of Guidat US Patent 7,044,207. Regarding Claim 1, Taylor discloses an electronics assembly 10 (cooling device) for an electronics package 20 (energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly) ([0001], entire disclosure dependent upon) comprising: a first heat sink 30 in whose interior at least one pass for cooling fluid or fluid vessel 80 (coolant channel) is formed ([0013]), wherein the first heat sink 30 comprises a first containment plate 82 (sheet metal blank) and a second containment plate 84 (sheet metal blank) ([0019]), wherein the first sheet metal blank 82 and the second sheet metal blank 84 are cohesively joined to each other surface to surface by a brazing process1 ([0019]), wherein the first sheet metal blank 82 has a channel-shaped bulge to accommodate the coolant channel 80 that bulges out of the joining plane between the first sheet metal blank 82 and the second sheet metal blank 84 (Figs. 2-3, [0019]), is connected to the second sheet metal blank 84 only at an edge of the second sheet metal blank 84 (Fig. 3, [0019]), and forms the at least one coolant channel 80 (Fig. 3, [0019]); a second heat sink 40 comprising at least one fluid vessel 80 (coolant channel) and containment plates 82, 84 (sheet metal blanks) joined to each other by a brazing process ([0019]); and clamps 50/60 including pilot holes 52/62 and positioning fasteners 54/64 (traction elements), wherein the traction elements 50/60,52/62,54/64 connect the first heat sink 30 to the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 (Fig. 3, [0013]-[0014]), connect the second heat sink 40 to the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 (Fig. 3, [0013]-[0014]), and connect the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink to each other (Fig. 3, [0013]-[0014]), wherein the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 are on opposite sides of the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 such that the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 is sandwiched between the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 in a gap between the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 that corresponds to the dimensions of the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 (Fig. 2, [0013]), and wherein the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 are tensioned towards each other and on the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 by the traction elements 50/60, 52/62, 54/64 such that the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 is clamped between the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 to form an electronics assembly 10 (Figs. 2-3, [0013]-[0014]), wherein the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 each comprise convex surfaces defining connection surfaces on the clamps 50/60 shaped-adapted to connection poles of the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly ([0017]), and wherein the connection surfaces comprise bore- and/or hole-like recesses shape-adapted to circuit connections 24 (pin-like protruding connection journals) of a battery and/or a capacitor ([0016]). PNG media_image2.png 814 1500 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 3 of Taylor Taylor fails to explicitly disclose wherein the first sheet metal blank 82 and the second sheet metal blank 84 have the same thickness. However, Guidat discloses a heat exchange module (Abstract, entire disclosure dependent upon). Guidat teaches welding two flat metal sheets together with identical shapes and thicknesses of less than 1.5 mm results in improved economic and thermal properties (Column 4, lines 25-52). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the instant application to modify the cooling device of Taylor such that the first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank have the same thickness and shape in order to improve economic and thermal properties of the cooling device, as taught by Guidat. 1 Claim 1 is considered a product-by-process claim. The cited prior art teaches all of the positively recited structure of the claimed apparatus or product. The determination of patentability is based upon the apparatus structure itself. The patentability of a product or apparatus does not depend on its method of production or formation. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process. See In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (see MPEP § 2113). Regarding Claim 7, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device of Claim 1, and Taylor discloses wherein the joining plane between the first sheet metal blank 82 and the second sheet metal blank 84 approximately centrally through a cross-sectional area of the first heat sink 30 (Annotated Fig. 3). Regarding Claim 10, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device of Claim 1, and Taylor discloses wherein on surfaces facing apart from each other pilot holes 52/62 (holders) are seated on the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40, and wherein the holders 52/62 are held together by the traction elements 50/60, 52/62, 54/64 (Fig. 3, [0014]). Regarding Claim 11, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device of Claim 10, and Taylor discloses wherein the holders 52/62 are incorporated within the plate-shape design of the corresponding clamps 50/60 and wherein the traction elements 50/60, 52/62, 54/64 are latchable to the holders 52/62 via the connection between the fasteners 54/64 and the pilot holes 52/62 (Fig. 3, [0014]). Regarding Claim 14, Taylor discloses an electronics assembly 10 (energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly) comprising the cooling device of Taylor in view of Guidat as described in the rejection of Claim 1 for cooling at least one energy accumulator and/or electronic module 10 ([0001]). Regarding Claim 15, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed energy accumulator and/or electronic module of Claim 14, and Taylor discloses wherein the at least one energy accumulator and/or electronic module 10 is clamped between the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40, and wherein the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 are held on the at least one energy accumulator and/or electronic module 10 with clamps 50/60 (Figs. 2-3, [0013]-[0014]). Regarding Claim 16, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly of Claim 15, and Taylor discloses wherein at least one of the first heat sink 30 and second heat sink 40 is in contact with a circuit connections 24 (connection pole) of the at least one energy accumulator and/or electronic module 10 ([0016]). Regarding Claim 17, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly of Claim 15, and Taylor discloses wherein a plurality of pilot holes 52/62 (holders) separate from the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 are located on clamps 50/60 are seated on sides of the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 facing away from the at least one energy accumulator and/or electronic module 10 and are held on the at least one energy accumulator and/or electronic module 10 by the screws 54/64 of the traction elements 50/60, 52/62, 54/64 (Fig. 3, [0013]-[0014]). Regarding Claim 19, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly of Claim 15, and Taylor discloses wherein at least one of the traction elements 50/60, 52/62, 54/64, specifically screws 54/64, are latchable in place on at least one of the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 (Fig. 3, [0014]). Regarding Claim 20, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly of Claim 14, and Taylor discloses wherein the at least one energy accumulator and/or electronic module 10 comprises a plurality of energy accumulator and/or electronic modules 20 arranged adjacent to each other in a row (which meets the claim limitation of in a row or in a matrix) and are clamped by the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 on opposite sides (Fig. 2, [0013]-[0014]). Claims 1, 3-4, 6, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Taylor US PG Publication 2007/0097627 in view of Kopp US PG Publication 2017/0263987 and Guidat US Patent 7,044,207. Regarding Claim 1, Taylor discloses an electronics assembly 10 (cooling device) for an electronics package 20 (energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly) ([0001], entire disclosure dependent upon) comprising: a first heat sink 30 in whose interior at least one pass for cooling fluid or fluid vessel 80 (coolant channel) is formed ([0013]), wherein the first heat sink 30 comprises a first containment plate 82 (sheet metal blank) and a second containment plate 84 (sheet metal blank) ([0019]), wherein the first sheet metal blank 82 and the second sheet metal blank 84 are cohesively joined to each other surface to surface by a brazing process ([0019]), wherein the first sheet metal blank 82 has a channel-shaped bulge that bulges out of the joining plane between the first sheet metal blank 82 and the second sheet metal blank 84 (Fig. 3, [0019]), is connected to the second sheet metal blank 84 only at an edge of the second sheet metal blank 84 (Fig. 3, [0019]), and forms the at least one coolant channel 80 (Fig. 3, [0019]); a second heat sink 40 comprising at least one fluid vessel 80 (coolant channel) and containment plates 82, 84 (sheet metal blanks) joined to each other by a brazing process ([0019]); and clamps 50/60 including pilot holes 52/62 and positioning fasteners 54/64 (traction elements), wherein the traction elements 50/60,52/62,54/64 connect the first heat sink 30 to the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 (Fig. 3, [0013]-[0014]), connect the second heat sink 40 to the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 (Fig. 3, [0013]-[0014]), and connect the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink to each other (Fig. 3, [0013]-[0014]), wherein the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 are on opposite sides of the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 such that the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 is sandwiched between the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 in a gap between the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 that corresponds to the dimensions of the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 (Fig. 2, [0013]), and wherein the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 are tensioned towards each other and on the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 by the traction elements 50/60, 52/62, 54/64 such that the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly 20 is clamped between the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 to form an electronics assembly 10 (Figs. 2-3, [0013]-[0014]), wherein the first heat sink 30 and the second heat sink 40 each comprise convex surfaces defining connection surfaces on the clamps 50/60 shaped-adapted to connection poles of the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly ([0017]), and wherein the connection surfaces comprise bore- and/or hole-like recesses shape-adapted to circuit connections 24 (pin-like protruding connection journals) of a battery and/or a capacitor ([0016]). While Taylor discloses a method for connecting the first sheet metal blank 82 and the second sheet metal blank 84 ([0019]), Taylor fails to disclose wherein the method comprises a roll-bonding joining connection. However, Kopp discloses a cooling plate for an electrical energy storage device ([0004], entire disclosure dependent upon) comprising a base plate in whose interior at least one cooling channel is formed ([0004]), wherein the base plate comprises a first sheet metal and a second sheet metal that are comprise aluminum, aluminum alloys, copper, and/or gold sheets ([0006]) and are cohesively joined to each other in a non-detachable manner with a roll bonding method and/or adhesive method to form a channel-shaped bulge ([0004], [0013], [0031]) with a harmoniously curved wave contour as seen in cross-section (Fig. 1c). The channel-shaped bulge is formed by inflation ([0011]), such that the sheet metals form a flat heat sink plate with the exception of the channel-shaped bulge (Fig. 3, [0033]). Thereby increasing mechanical stability and decreasing weight of the overall apparatus ([0013]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the instant application to modify the cooling device of Taylor such that the first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank comprise aluminum, aluminum alloys, copper, and/or gold sheets and are cohesively joined to each other in a non-detachable manner with a roll bonding method to form a channel-shaped bulge with a harmoniously curved wave contour as seen in cross-section and wherein the channel-shaped bulge is formed by inflation, such that the first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank form a flat heat sink plate with the exception of the channel-shaped bulge, thereby increasing mechanical stability and decreasing weight of the overall apparatus, as taught by Kopp. Taylor in view of Kopp fails to explicitly disclose wherein the first sheet metal blank 82 and the second sheet metal blank 84 have the same thickness. However, Guidat discloses a heat exchange module (Abstract, entire disclosure dependent upon). Guidat teaches welding two flat metal sheets together with identical shapes and thicknesses of less than 1.5 mm results in improved economic and thermal properties (Column 4, lines 25-52). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the instant application to modify the cooling device of Taylor in view of Kopp such that the first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank have the same thickness and shape in order to improve economic and thermal properties of the cooling device, as taught by Guidat. Regarding Claim 3, Taylor in view of Kopp and Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device according to Claim 1, and (as previously described in the rejection of Claim 1) Taylor in view of Kopp and Guidat discloses wherein the channel-shaped bulge has a harmoniously curved wave contour as seen in cross section (Kopp Fig. 1c). PNG media_image3.png 248 318 media_image3.png Greyscale Figure 1c of Kopp Regarding Claim 4, Taylor in view of Kopp and Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device according to Claim 1, and (as previously described in the rejection of Claim 1) Taylor in view of Kopp and Guidat discloses wherein the channel-shaped bulge is formed by inflation (Kopp [0011]). Regarding Claim 6, Taylor in view of Kopp and Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device according to Claim 1, and (as previously described in the rejection of Claim 1) Taylor in view of Kopp and Guidat discloses wherein the cohesively joined first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank form a flat heat sink plate with the exception of the channel shaped bulge (Kopp Fig. 3, [0033]). Regarding Claim 8, Taylor in view of Kopp and Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device according to Claim 1, and (as previously described in the rejection of Claim 1) Taylor in view of Kopp and Guidat discloses wherein the first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank comprise aluminum, aluminum alloys, copper, and/or gold sheets (which meets the claim limitation of comprise aluminum sheets) (Kopp [0006]). Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Taylor US PG Publication 2007/0097627 in view of Guidat US Patent 7,044,207, as applied to Claim 1, further in view of Gradinger US PG Publication 2013/0077245. Regarding Claim 5, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device of Claim 1. Taylor in view of Guidat fails to disclose wherein only the first sheet metal blank has the channel-shaped bulge, and wherein the second sheet metal blank is flat and/or has a bulge-free surface. However, Gradinger discloses a cooling device (e.g., cooling module) for cooling an energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly (e.g., electronic and/or electric component) ([0008]) comprising: a first heat sink ([0122]) in whose interior at least one coolant channel (e.g., conduit 113) is formed, wherein the plate-shaped heat sink comprises a first sheet metal blank and a second sheet metal blank (e.g., panels 11) ([0120]-[0126]), wherein the first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank (e.g., panels 11) are cohesively joined to each other surface to surface with a roll-bonding joining connection (e.g., rollbonded) ([0124]), wherein the first sheet metal blank (e.g., panel 11) had a channel-shaped bulge that bulges out of a joining plane between the first sheet metal blank (e.g., panel 11) and the second sheet metal blank (e.g., panel 11), is connected to the second sheet metal blank (e.g., panel 11) only at its edge, and forms the at least one coolant channel (e.g., conduit 113) (Modified Fig. 7, [0133]-[0136]). Gradinger teaches wherein only the first sheet metal blank (e.g., panel 11) has the channel shaped bugle, and wherein the second sheet metal has a bulge free surface (which meets the claim limitation of is flat and/or has a bulge-free surface) to properly transfer the coolant (Modified Fig. 7, [0133]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to modify the cooling device of Taylor in view of Guidat such that only the first sheet metal blank has the channel-shaped bulge, and wherein the second sheet metal blank has a bulge free surface in order to properly transfer the coolant, as taught by Gradinger. PNG media_image4.png 685 884 media_image4.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 7 of Gradinger Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Taylor US PG Publication 2007/0097627 in view of Guidat US Patent 7,044,207, as applied to Claim 1, further in view of Sayir US PG Publication 2007/0053168. Regarding Claim 13, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed cooling device of claim 1, but fails to disclose wherein the first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank have an aluminum oxide (Al2O3) coating. However, Sayir discloses a thermal management assembly (cooling device) for dissipating thermal energy (cooling) an electronic device (energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly) with a heat sink ([0010]). Sayir teaches applying a coating layer of aluminum oxide with plasma spray coating to act as an adhesive to further laminate metal foil (sheet metal blank) ([0052]-[0056]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to further include, in the cooling device of Taylor in view of Guidat, the first sheet metal blank and the second sheet metal blank having an aluminum oxide (Al2O3) coating to act as an adhesive to further laminate the metal sheet blanks, as taught by Sayir. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Taylor US PG Publication 2007/0097627 in view of Guidat US Patent 7,044,207, as applied to Claim 15, further in view of Leah US PG Publication 2016/0380298. Regarding Claim 18, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly of claim 15 but fails to disclose wherein the traction elements are pull rods. However, Leah teaches a fuel cell stack comprising first and second ends between a base plate and an end plate ([0023]). Leah teaches the base plate, end plate, and at least one fuel cell are clamped together using tension pull rods to exert compressive force upon the components between them ([0037]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application that the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly of Taylor in view of Guidat would further comprise the traction elements being pull rods in order to exert compressive force upon the components between the traction elements, as taught by Leah. Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Taylor US PG Publication 2007/0097627 in view of Guidat US Patent 7,044,207, as applied to Claim 14, further in view of Sayir US PG Publication 2007/0053168. Regarding Claim 21, Taylor in view of Guidat teaches the instantly claimed energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly of claim 14, and Taylor discloses wherein the first heat sink 30 and/or the second heat sink 40 comprises a connection surface on clamps 50/60 shape-adapted to at least one connection pole of the at least one energy accumulator and/or electronic module 10 (Fig. 3, [0016]). Taylor in view of Guidat fails to disclose wherein the first heat sink and/or the second heat sink comprises an insulating and/or thermally conductive coating comprising a ceramic coating or an aluminum oxide coating. However, Sayir discloses a thermal management assembly (cooling device) for dissipating thermal energy (cooling) an electronic device (energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly) with a heat sink ([0010]). Sayir teaches applying a coating layer of a ceramic or aluminum oxide with plasma spray coating to act as an adhesive to form an ultra-thin heat sink or further laminate metal foil (sheet metal blank) ([0052]-[0056]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to further include, in the energy accumulator and/or electronic assembly of Taylor in view of Guidat, the first heat sink and/or the second heat sink comprising an insulating and/or thermally conductive coating comprising a ceramic coating or an aluminum oxide coating to form an ultra-thin heat sink or further laminate the sheet metal blank, as taught by Sayir. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLIVIA MASON MELFI whose telephone number is (703)756-4652. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Ruddock can be reached on (571)272-1481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /O.M.M./Examiner, Art Unit 1729 /ULA C RUDDOCK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
May 01, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 29, 2024
Response Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 28, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 21, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683150
HIGH-NICKEL POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK AND POWER CONSUMING DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671087
LITHIUM METAL COMPOSITE OXIDE, POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, POSITIVE ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12649370
MOTOR VEHICLE
4y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12637363
CATHODE MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF AND SECONDARY LITHIUM BATTERY
4y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12609303
ANODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+23.6%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 40 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month