Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/504,869

STRADDLE MOUNTED LOW PRESSURE COMPRESSOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 19, 2021
Examiner
MEADE, LORNE EDWARD
Art Unit
3741
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
283 granted / 563 resolved
-19.7% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+39.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
607
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 563 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is in response to Applicant’s arguments and amendments filed on 01/22/2026 amending Claim 1. Claim 1 is are examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suciu et al. (2016/0024958A1) hereinafter “Suciu’958” in view of Becker, Jr. et al. (2017/0051680A1) as evidenced by Merry et al. (9,938,898) hereinafter “Merry’898” in view of Suciu et al. (9,869,248) hereinafter “Suciu’248”. Regarding Claim 1, Suciu’958 teaches, in Figs. 1A - 3, the invention as claimed, including a gas turbine engine (10 – Fig. 1A) comprising: a fan section (20) including a fan with fan blades (34), wherein said fan section (20) drives air along a bypass flow path in a bypass duct [airflow area defined between fan case (F) and core case (C)]; a gear reduction (25) in driving engagement with the fan (Para. [0048]), wherein the gear reduction (25) is a planetary gear system (Para. [0050]); a low spool (14) including a low pressure turbine (18) having a plurality of stages (Para. [0052] teaches 3 to 6 low pressure turbine stages) driving a low pressure compressor (16) and driving the gear reduction (25) to drive the fan (20, 34) at a speed slower than (Para. [0050] teaches a gear reduction greater than about 2.3) the low pressure turbine (18), the fan blades (34) also delivering air into the low pressure compressor (16 – Para. [0051]); a high spool (24) including a high pressure turbine (28) driving a high pressure compressor (26); a first low spool support bearing (62 – Para. [0059]); and a second low spool support bearing (62 – Para. [0059]) located axially between the low pressure compressor stages [As shown in Fig. 1A, second low spool support bearing (62) was located axially between the last low pressure compressor stage (16D) and the first high pressure compressor stage (26A).] and the high pressure compressor (26); wherein the low pressure compressor (16) said plurality of stages includes at least 4 stages [Fig. 1A shows and Paras. [0007] and [0055] teaches that the low pressure compressor had 4 stages.] and no more than 7 stages and the high pressure compressor (26) includes more stages than the low pressure compressor [Fig. 1A shows and Paras. [0008] and [0055] teaches that the high pressure compressor (26) had 8 stages which was more stages than the low pressure compressor’s 4 stages.]. Suciu’958 is silent on said first low spool support bearing being located axially between the low pressure compressor stages and the gear reduction; there being an attachment between the low spool and the low pressure compressor with the first low spool support bearing being axially forward of the attachment, and axially forward of the low pressure compressor stages, and the second low spool support bearing being axially aft of the attachment and the low pressure compressor stages; and wherein the attachment includes two distinct attachments between the low spool and the low pressure compressor with the first low spool support bearing locating axially forward of a forward one of the two distinct attachments and the second low spool support bearing located axially aft of an aft one of the two distinct attachments, the forward one of the two distinct attachments extending forwardly to provide a drive input into the gear reduction. Becker teaches, in Figs. 1 - 7, a similar gas turbine engine having a ‘straddle mounted’ low pressure compressor (22) with a first low spool support bearing (labeled in Fig. 2 marked-up below, Para. [0037] teaches “A plurality of bearings 92 are provided to facilitate the rotation of these various components.”) being located axially between the low pressure compressor stages (in trapezoid shape 22) and a gear reduction [46 – Fig. 1, Para. [0029] teaches “The fan blades 40, disk 42, and actuation member 44 are together rotatable about the longitudinal axis 12 by LP shaft 36 across a power gear box 46. The power gear box 46 includes a plurality of gears for stepping down the rotational speed of the LP shaft 36 to a more efficient rotational fan speed.” Para. [0028] teaches “A low pressure (LP) shaft or spool 36 drivingly connects the LP turbine 30 to the LP compressor 22.” Para. [0035] teaches “In certain embodiments, aspects of the core 16 of the exemplary turbofan engine 10 depicted in FIG. 2 may be configured in a similar manner as the exemplary turbofan engine 10 described above with reference to FIG. 1. Accordingly, the same numbering refers to the same or similar component.” It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, that the core engine (16) embodiment shown in Fig. 2 configured similar to the turbofan engine (10) shown in Fig. 1 would have had the forward distinct attachment extending forwardly to provide a drive input to the gear reduction (46).] there being an attachment (labeled “forward distinct attachment” and “aft distinct attachment”) between the low spool (36) and the low pressure compressor (trapezoid shape 22 that was radially offset from the low spool shaft 36) with the first low spool support bearing (labeled “first low spool support bearing”) being axially forward of the attachment (labeled “forward distinct attachment”), and axially forward of the low pressure compressor stages (in trapezoid shape 22, shown in Fig. 2) and the second low spool support bearing (labeled “second low spool support bearing”) being axially aft of the attachment (labeled “aft distinct attachment”) and the low pressure compressor stages (in trapezoid shape 22, shown in Fig. 2), the second low spool support bearing (labeled “second low spool support bearing”) located axially between the low pressure compressor stages (in trapezoid shape 22) and the high pressure compressor (24 shown in Fig. 2, Para. [0028] teaches “The outer casing 18 encases, in serial flow relationship, a compressor section including a booster or low pressure (LP) compressor 22 and a high pressure (HP) compressor 24; a combustion section 26; a turbine section including a high pressure (HP) turbine 28 and a low pressure (LP) turbine 30; and a jet exhaust nozzle section 32.”); and wherein the attachment includes two distinct attachments (labeled “forward distinct attachment” and “aft distinct attachment”) between the low spool (36) and the low pressure compressor (22) with the first low spool support bearing (labeled “first low spool support bearing”) locating axially forward of a forward one (labeled “forward distinct attachment”) of the two distinct attachments and the second low spool support bearing (labeled “second low spool support bearing”) located axially aft of an aft one (labeled “aft distinct attachment”) of the two distinct attachments, the forward one of the two distinct attachments (labeled “forward distinct attachment”) extending forwardly to provide a drive input (Para. [0029] teaches “The fan blades 40, disk 42, and actuation member 44 are together rotatable about the longitudinal axis 12 by LP shaft 36 across a power gear box 46.”) into the gear reduction (46). PNG media_image1.png 646 1177 media_image1.png Greyscale Becker - Figs. 2 – 7 do not show the individual stages of the low pressure compressor (22) because the compressors are represented by a trapezoid on its side which was a conventional geometric shape used in the gas turbine art to represent an axial compressor. PNG media_image2.png 642 950 media_image2.png Greyscale As evidenced by Merry’898 in Figs. 1 – 3, a similar ‘straddle mounted’ low pressure compressor (22) had seven (7) axial stages where a ‘stage’ was a row of rotating compressor blades adjacent to a row of non-rotating stator vanes. As shown in Fig. 1 marked-up below, the seven (7) axial stage low pressure compressor (22) of Merry’898 had a first low spool support bearing (labeled “first low spool support bearing”) locating axially forward of a forward distinct attachment (labeled “forward distinct attachment”) and a second low spool support bearing (labeled “second low spool support bearing”) located axially aft of an aft distinct attachments (labeled “aft distinct attachment”) to the spool shaft (34) driven by turbine (30). Merry’898 also showed, in Figs. 1 – 3, a similar ‘straddle mounted’ high pressure compressor (24) that had six (6) axial stages with a first high spool support bearing (58) locating axially forward of a forward distinct attachment (best seen in Fig. 3) and a second high spool support bearing (60) located axially aft of an aft distinct attachments (36 - best seen in Fig. 3) to the spool shaft (36) driven by turbine (26). Therefore, ‘straddle mounted’ axial compressors having a plurality of stages were known in the gas turbine art. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Suciu’958 by locating the first low spool support bearing axially between the low pressure compressor stages and the gear reduction; there being an attachment between the low spool and the low pressure compressor with the first low spool support bearing being axially forward of the attachment, and axially forward of the low pressure compressor stages, and the second low spool support bearing being axially aft of the attachment and the low pressure compressor stages; and wherein the attachment includes two distinct attachments between the low spool and the low pressure compressor with the first low spool support bearing locating axially forward of a forward one of the two distinct attachments and the second low spool support bearing located axially aft of an aft one of the two distinct attachments, the forward one of the two distinct attachments extending forwardly to provide a drive input into the gear reduction arrangement, taught by Becker because Suciu’248 teaches, in Col. 5, ll. 15 – 21, that ‘straddle mounting’ the low pressure compressor improved control over blade shift clearances and further improves engine efficiency. As shown in Suciu’248 – Fig. 4 and taught in Col. 4, ll. 60 – 67 and Col. 5, ll. 15 – 21, ‘straddle mounting’ the low pressure compressor (30) meant locating a first low spool support bearing (221) axially forward of the low pressure compressor (30) stages and locating a second low spool support bearing (223) axially aft of the low pressure compressor (30) stages to maintain the very small radial air gap, i.e., clearance, between the compressor casing and the tips of the rotating compressor blades of each stage by prevent said rotating compressor blades from radially deflecting away from the rotational axis due to vibrational modes from high speed rotations. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, that in the combination of Suciu’958, i.v., Becker, a.e., Merry’898, i.v., Suciu’248, a forward attachment adjacent to and axially aft of the first low spool support bearing would have been required to connect the axially forward stage of the low pressure compressor to the low spool shaft to facilitate improving engine efficiency by improving control over blade shift clearances of the axially forward stages of the low pressure compressor. Similarly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, that that in the combination of Suciu’958, i.v., Becker, a.e., Merry’898, i.v., Suciu’248, an aft attachment adjacent to and axially forward of the second low spool support bearing would have been required to connect the axially aft stage of the low pressure compressor to the low spool shaft to facilitate improving engine efficiency by improving control over blade shift clearances of the axially aft stages of the low pressure compressor. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 01/22/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. To the extent possible they have been addressed in the rejections above at the appropriate locations, and furthermore they were found not persuasive for the following reasons. Applicant argues on Pg. 3, fourth paragraph, that Merry’898’s forward attachment does not extend on to drive the gear reduction (the new amended limitations). This argument is irrelevant because Merry’898 wasn’t used to teach that limitations. As discussed above, Merry’898 was used as evidence that Becker’s trapezoidal geometric shape conventional symbol for a gas turbine compressor actually had a plurality of axial stages located aft/downstream of a first low spool support bearing located axially forward of a forward distinct attachment to the first compressor stage and a second low spool support bearing located axially aft/downstream of an aft distinct attachments to the last compressor stage. Therefore, Merry was not used to teach the argued new limitations. The rejections are maintained. Applicant argues on Pg. 3, fifth paragraph, continuing on to Pg. 4 that the rationale for the proposed combination with Merry’898 and Becker is conclusory. Applicant’s arguments regarding Merry’898 are addressed immediately above. Applicant’s arguments against Becker are refuted by Becker. Becker teaches, in Para. [0037] teaches “A plurality of bearings 92 are provided to facilitate the rotation of these various components.” Becker teaches, in Para. [0029] teaches “The fan blades 40, disk 42, and actuation member 44 are together rotatable about the longitudinal axis 12 by LP shaft 36 across a power gear box 46. The power gear box 46 includes a plurality of gears for stepping down the rotational speed of the LP shaft 36 to a more efficient rotational fan speed.” Becker teaches, in Para. [0028] teaches “A low pressure (LP) shaft or spool 36 drivingly connects the LP turbine 30 to the LP compressor 22.” Becker teaches, in Para. [0035] teaches “In certain embodiments, aspects of the core 16 of the exemplary turbofan engine 10 depicted in FIG. 2 may be configured in a similar manner as the exemplary turbofan engine 10 described above with reference to FIG. 1. Accordingly, the same numbering refers to the same or similar component.” Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, that the core engine (16) embodiment shown in Fig. 2 configured similar to the turbofan engine (10) shown in Fig. 1 would have had the forward distinct attachment extending forwardly to provide a drive input to the gear reduction (46) so that the rotational speed of the LP shaft 36 would have been stepped down, i.e., reduced to a slower rotational speed, to a more efficient rotational fan speed. The rejections are maintained. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LORNE E MEADE whose telephone number is (571)270-7570. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phutthiwat Wongwian can be reached at 571-270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LORNE E MEADE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2021
Application Filed
Jun 14, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 14, 2023
Response Filed
Jul 26, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 11, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 21, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 21, 2023
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 28, 2023
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 28, 2023
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 02, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 26, 2023
Notice of Allowance
Nov 29, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 07, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 14, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 15, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600487
SEGMENTED NACELLE INLET LIP WITH ELECTRIC ANTI-ICING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595785
IONIC THRUSTER METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591258
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO MEASURE TEMPERATURE AND GENERATE HEAT USING A RESISTIVE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571360
THREE-STREAM GAS TURBINE ENGINE WITH EMBEDDED ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571345
TURBINE ENGINE INCLUDING A STEAM SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+39.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 563 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month