Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/504,893

METHODS AND APPARATUS TO DELIVER RELIABLE MULTICAST SERVICES VIA MULTICAST RADIO BEARER (MRB)

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 19, 2021
Examiner
ALAWDI, SHEHAB A
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
67%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
21 granted / 25 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -17% lift
Without
With
+-17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
63
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 25 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim [1,3,5-6,9-11,13,15-16 and 19-20] is rejected under 35 U.S.C 103 as being unpatentable over Prasad (US 20220038866 A1) in view of Tao (US 20230023919 A1) further in view of Kadiri (US 20210068003 A1). In regards to claim 1 and 11, Prasad teaches A method comprising: configuring, by a user equipment (UE), a multicast radio bearer (MRB) for one or more multicast and broadcast services (MBSs) in a wireless network, wherein an MRB configuration enables feedback for the one or more MBSs; [0048] The core network 130 or the base stations 110 may include a multicast radio bearer-unicast data radio bearer (MRB-DRB) module 138 for transmitting, to one or more UEs 120, multicast data via a multicast channel and receiving, from the one or more UEs 120, feedback in response to transmitting the multicast data. The MRB-DRB module 138 may also identify a first access stratum layer associated with the feedback. The MRB-DRB module 138 may further select a unicast channel or the multicast channel for a re-transmission at a second access stratum layer in response to identifying the first access stratum layer. Additionally, the MRB-DRB module 138 may re-transmit, to the one or more UEs 120, the multicast data via the multicast channel or the unicast channel based on the selection. establishing the MRB and a UE protocol stack for an active MBS based on the MRB configuration upon detecting one or more activation conditions, wherein the MRB is associated with one or two channels comprising a multicast channel and a unicast channel; [0036] the one or more UEs may provide hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback, packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) feedback, or radio link control (RLC) status feedback to a base station based on receiving an initial multicast data transmission on a multicast channel associated with an MRB. In such examples, the base station may identify an access stratum layer, such as an RLC layer, a PDCP layer, or a medium access control (MAC) layer, associated with the feedback received from the one or more UEs, receiving data packets of the active MBS through the established MRB in a multi-cast service area [0070] a number of UEs served by a base station, UE capability (for example, whether the UE supports the MRB), a total number of UEs of a group of UEs providing multicast feedback, radio channel conditions, or coverage conditions, comprising one or more serving cells. [0039] A BS may provide communications coverage for a macro cell, a pico cell, a femto cell, and another type of cell. a transceiver that transmits and receives radio frequency (RF) signal in a wireless network; [0087] The receiver 1010 may include a set of radio frequency (RF) chains that are coupled with or otherwise utilize a set of antennas (for example, the set of antennas may be an example of aspects of the antennas 234a through 234t described with reference to FIG. 2). [0088] The transmitter 1020 may transmit signals generated by the communications manager 1015 or other components of the wireless communication device 1000. In some examples, the transmitter 1020 may be collocated with the receiver 1010 in a transceiver. Prasad does not teach reconfiguring the MRB to change a type of the MRB upon detecting one or more reconfiguration conditions; and releasing the MRB upon detecting one or more releasing conditions. However, Tao does teach reconfiguring the MRB to change a type of the MRB upon detecting one or more reconfiguration conditions; and releasing the MRB upon detecting one or more releasing conditions [0073] In one scenario, such as the reception of a certain multicast/broadcast service for a certain UE, the network configure the UE from PTM reception to PTP reception, either in the granularity of the multicast/broadcast service or specific MRB serving the multicast/broadcast service. The configuration of step 1 may include the release of PTM type RLC bearers and the addition of PTP type RLC bearers for all MRBs or specific MRB serving the multicast/broadcast service, and wherein the configured MRB enables feedback for the active MBS with a packet data convergence protocol (PDCP)-based retransmission, [0107] The UE generates a corresponding PDCP status report (PDCP SR) according to the receiving status of the corresponding PDCP entity. The UE sends the PDCP SR to the peer PDCP entity in the network side through the type 1 or PTP type RLC bearer, and wherein the UE protocol stack includes one MRB PDCP entity, [0056] The QoS Flow data are mapped to one or more MRBs by the SDAP entity associated with the multicast/broadcast service (note that each QoS Flow can only be mapped to one specific MRB), and each MRB is associated with one PDCP entity, releasing the MRB by: releasing the MRB PDCP entity for the MRB; releasing corresponding one or two RLC entities for the MRB; [0053] The UE performs configuration of the local protocol stack according to the above configuration, for example, establishing a MRB, or modifying an existing MRB, releasing or suspending an existing MRB; establishing an RLC bearer, or modifying an existing RLC bearer, suspending or releasing an existing RLC bearer, and releasing associated one or two logic channels for the MRB. [0082] The above-mentioned disabling operation may correspond to the RLC bearer release operation in the existing standard, that is, the operation further corresponds to the release of the associated RLC entity or entities and the release of the corresponding LCH It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having the teachings of Prasad and Tao before him or her, to modify the method of Prasad to include reconfiguration of MRB as taught by Tao. The motivation for doing so would be to improve network transmission. (Paragraph 0074 by Tao)]. Prasad and Tao do not teach wherein the MRB is configured with a type comprising a split MRB, a multicast traffic channel (MTCH), or dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) type. However, Kadiri teaches wherein the MRB is configured with a type comprising a split MRB, a multicast traffic channel (MTCH), or dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) type. [0005] Dependent on the selected mode and/or quality of service, the base station may select a dedicated radio bearer (DRB) for transmission of the traffic in a unicast mode (e.g., to a particular UE) or a multicast radio bearer (MRB) for transmission of the traffic in a broadcast/multicast mode. wherein the reconfiguration conditions comprising performing UE state transition to a UE CONNECTED state and receiving a command to modify the MRB; [0074] The base station may determine whether to use multicast/broadcast techniques or unicast techniques based on a QoS associated with the multicast/broadcast traffic as well as connected states of UEs. Dependent on the selected mode (e.g., multicast/broadcast and/or unicast), the base station may utilize a data radio bearer (DRB) or multicast radio bearer (MRB) for communication of the traffic. Further, the services and bearer (MRB or DRB) configurations may be configured for various UEs using either RRC signaling or multicast control channel (MCCH) procedures. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having the teachings of Prasad, Kadiri and Tao before him or her, to modify the method of Prasad and Tao to include configuration of MRB as taught by Kadiri. The motivation for doing so would be to improve communication quality. (Paragraph 0041 by Kadiri)]. In regards to claim 4 and 14, Prasad, Kadiri and Tao teach the limitations of the parent claim. Prasad also teaches wherein the configured MRB enables feedback for the active MBS with a packet data convergence protocol (PDCP)-based retransmission, and wherein the UE protocol stack includes one MRB PDCP entity. [0036] Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to re-transmitting multicast data in response to feedback received from one or more UEs. In some examples, the one or more UEs may provide hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback, packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) feedback, or radio link control (RLC) status feedback to a base station based on receiving an initial multicast data transmission on a multicast channel associated with an MRB. In such examples, the base station may identify an access stratum layer, such as an RLC layer, a PDCP layer, or a medium access control (MAC) layer, associated with the feedback received from the one or more UEs. In regards to claim 5 and 15, Prasad, Kadiri and Tao teach the limitations of the parent claim. Prasad also teaches wherein the MRB is established with a multicast channel and a unicast channel, and wherein the UE protocol stack further includes two radio link control (RLC) entities that one for multicast data packets of the multicast channel and one for unicast data packets of the unicast channel. [0064 and FIG 4] The PDCP layer may optionally perform robust header compression (RoHC) functions and security functions, as well as other functions. The PDCP layer communicates with the RLC layer via an RLC channel. The RLC layer may contain segments and reassemble packet segmentation as well as perform ARQ error control procedures (shown as Segm. ARQ in FIG. 4). The RLC sublayer may be configured to support different transmission modes, such as an unacknowledged mode (UM) and an acknowledged mode (AM). Fig 4 shows the multicast and unicast PDU sessions with Segm. ARQ within the RLC layer of each. In regards to claim 6 and 16, Prasad, Kadiri and Tao teach the limitations of the parent claim. Prasad also teaches wherein the MRB is established with a single channel selecting from a multicast channel and a unicast channel, and wherein the UE protocol stack further includes one RLC entity. [0036] The re-transmission channel may be the multicast channel or a unicast channel associated with a DRB. The base station may select the re-transmission channel at the RLC layer or the MAC layer based on an access stratum layer associated with the feedback. In some examples, the base station may select the multicast channel or the unicast channel for re-transmitting the multicast data based on one or more of a number of UEs served by the base station, a number of UEs providing multicast feedback, or a radio channel condition. In regards to claim 9 and 19, Prasad, Kadiri and Tao teach the limitations of the parent claim. Prasad also teaches wherein the configured MRB enables feedback for the active MBS with a PDCP-based retransmission, and wherein the UE protocol stack includes one MRB PDCP entity, and wherein the reconfiguring the MRB comprising reconfiguring the MRB PDCP entity to update one or two corresponding RLC entities accordingly for the MRB. [0036] Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to re-transmitting multicast data in response to feedback received from one or more UEs. In some examples, the one or more UEs may provide hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback, packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) feedback, or radio link control (RLC) status feedback to a base station based on receiving an initial multicast data transmission on a multicast channel associated with an MRB. In such examples, the base station may identify an access stratum layer, such as an RLC layer, a PDCP layer, or a medium access control (MAC) layer, associated with the feedback received from the one or more UEs. In regards to claim 3 and 13, Prasad, Kadiri and Tao teach the limitations of the parent claim. Prasad also teaches wherein the release conditions comprising: stop of the active MBS, leaving the multi-cast service area, losing interest in multicast services, an indication of stop receiving the active MBS, receiving a command to release the MRB, and performing a state transition away from a UE CONNECTED state. [0070] In one such example, the MRB enabled base station may switch to the DRB when only one UE is using the multicast service of the MRB enabled base. In some such examples, one or more UEs may leave a coverage area of the MRB enabled base station, such that a number of UEs using the multicast service is less than a multicast threshold. In regards to claim 10 and 20, Prasad, Kadiri and Tao teach the limitations of the parent claim. Prasad also teaches performing the MRB reconfiguration based on the RRC reconfiguration message, [0073] In the example of FIG. 5, an RRC configuration may map the MRB to the DRB. That is, the base station may notify the UE of a switch from the DRB to the MRB, or vice versa, using RRC signaling or MAC-CE signaling. Transmitting an indication of the switch between the MRB and the DRB via control signaling may be an example of a hard switch. In this example, the hard switch maintains service continuity. Prasad does not teach transitioning to a UE CONNECTED state; sending an indication of interest in the one or more MBS; receiving an RRC reconfiguration message of an MRB reconfiguration for the MRB. However, Kadiri teaches transitioning to a UE CONNECTED state; sending an indication of interest in the one or more MBS; [0044] A method of wireless communication at a UE is described. The method may include receiving, from a base station, a traffic indication that multicast/broadcast traffic is available for the UE, receiving, from the base station, a state indication that identifies whether the UE is to be in a CONNECTED mode state in order to receive the multicast/broadcast traffic, and receiving the multicast/broadcast traffic while in one of an IDLE, INACTIVE, or CONNECTED mode state, consistent with the state indication, receiving an RRC reconfiguration message of an MRB reconfiguration for the MRB [0126] The RAN node may deliver service to UEs based on MRB or DRB with reliable retransmission based on feedback received from RRC_CONNECTED state UEs 115. For MRB to DRB and DRB to MRB switching, the UE 115 may be notified using RRC or MAC-CE messaging. Using a MRB bearer, transmissions and retransmissions may be either broadcast or unicast depending on a bearer type configuration. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having the teachings of Prasad, Kadiri and Tao before him or her, to modify the method of Prasad and Tao to include configuration of MRB as taught by Kadiri. The motivation for doing so would be to improve communication quality. (Paragraph 0041 by Kadiri)]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 and 12 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but could be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEHAB A ALAWDI whose telephone number is (571)270-3203. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, [ Hamza, Faruk] can be reached on [ (571) 272-7969]. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEHAB A ALAWDI/Examiner, Art Unit 2466 /JAY P PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2021
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 20, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 15, 2024
Interview Requested
Apr 30, 2024
Response Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 07, 2024
Interview Requested
Oct 15, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 15, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 17, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 17, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 03, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 12, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 05, 2025
Interview Requested
Mar 17, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593324
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COORDINATING DATA TRANSMISSION IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587307
METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR DETERMINING PARAMETERS OF BURSTS FOR DATA FLOW TRANSMISSION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK BASED ON CHANNEL QUALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581330
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580680
INTERLEAVER DESIGN FOR NONCOHERENT REED MULLER CODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581435
METHOD FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION IN NR V2X BY TERMINAL IN WHICH NR MODULE AND LTE MODULE COEXIST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
67%
With Interview (-17.4%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 25 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month