Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/539,050

PASSIVATION COVERED LIGHT EMITTING UNIT STACK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 30, 2021
Examiner
MIYOSHI, JESSE Y
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seoul Viosys Co. Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
268 granted / 476 resolved
-11.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
530
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 476 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/14/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-3, 8, 11-12, and 15-20 have been considered but are not found persuasive. Applicant argues on page 6 that Chu does not teach an insulating layer that covers the entire upper region of the light source as claimed. Examiner respectfully disagrees. The rejection has been updated to show that insulating layers 330, 370 covers the entire upper region of the light source. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 8, 11, 12, 15-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ogihara (US PGPub 2007/0069220) in view of Shim et al. (US 6,100,103; hereinafter “Shim”), and Chu (US PGPub 2018/0212104). Re claim 1: Ogihara teaches (e.g. fig. 2 and 6) a light emitting diode (LED) pixel for a display, comprising: a light source (110a, 110b, 110c, 110d, 110e, 110f; hereinafter referred to as “LS”) configured to generate light and including a first type layer (n-type layer 110a) and at least one active layer (emission layer 110b; e.g. paragraph 64); a lower insulation layer (140) surrounding a side surface (side surface of LS) of the light source (LS), the lower insulation layer (140) including holes (holes for wiring connecting to 110a, 110d; hereinafter “VH”); a plurality of conductors (conductors to 108, 105, 107; hereinafter “VC”) electrically connected to the light source (LS); and wherein one of the conductors (108) does not overlap (108 does not overlap 130c) the at least one active layer (130c). Ogihara is silent as to explicitly teaching the first type layer has a mesa region and an extension region extended from the mesa region, the extension region being thinner than the mesa region; an upper insulation layer surrounding the side surface of the light source and covering an entire upper region of the light source such that the upper insulation layer extends continuously from a first side surface of the light source across the entire upper region and to a second side surface of the light source opposite to the first side surface; wherein an outer boundary of the upper insulation layer is greater than that of the light source, in plan view. Shim teaches (e.g. fi8g. 5A) the first type layer (11) has a mesa region (region B-B’) and an extension region (region A-A’) extended from the mesa region (B-B’), the extension region (A-A’) being thinner than the mesa region (B-B’). Chu teaches (e.g. fig. 3) an upper insulation layer (330, 370) surrounding the side surface of the light source (light emitted from active layer 316) and covering an entire upper region (upper part of 316, which is on the bottom side in fig. 3) of the light source (316) such that the upper insulation layer (330, 370) extends continuously (besides the opening for the conductors, 330, 370 is provided continuously, insomuch as PVT1 is provided continuously) from a first side surface (left side of 316) of the light source (316) across the entire upper region (upper part of 316, which is on the bottom side in fig. 3) and to a second side surface (right side of 316) of the light source (316) opposite to the first side surface; wherein an outer boundary of the upper insulation layer (330, 370) is greater than that of the light source (316), in plan view. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filling, absent unexpected results, to use the thinned extension region as taught by Shim and to use the upper insulation layer as taught by Chu in the device of Ogihara in order to have the predictable result of improving carrier distribution within the doped layers of the LED since carriers would be injected from the middle of the layers instead of the upper layer, and in order to have the predictable result of using a dielectric to protect the LED from contamination from exposure to the elements, respectively. Re claim 2: Ogihara teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 1, wherein a surface of the lower insulation layer (140) opposes a surface (bottom surface of 140) of the first type layer (110a). Re claim 3: Ogihara in view of Shim and Chu teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 1, wherein the side surface of the light source (LS) is closer to a center of the light source (LS) than outer surface (outer surfaces of 104) of the upper insulation layer (330 of Chu). Re claim 8: Ogihara in view of Shim and Chu teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 1, wherein an upper surface of the upper insulation layer (330, 370 of Chu) is disposed on a higher elevation than that of the light source (LS). Re claim 12: Ogihara teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 1, wherein the light source (LS) comprises a plurality of light emitting parts (110b, 110e, 130c) configured to emit light having different wavelengths from each other (see paragraph 83). Re claim 15: Ogihara teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 1, wherein the one of the conductors (VC) are disposed near a corner (108 is near 110b) of the LED pixel. Re claim 16: Ogihara teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 1, wherein: the light source (LS) further comprise a plurality of semiconductor layers (110a-110f); and the one of the conductors (VC) is disposed over at least one of the semiconductor layers (107 overlaps 110f), but does not overlay the at least one active layer (108 does not overlap 110f). Re claim 17: Ogihara in view of Shim and Chu teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 1, wherein the upper insulation layer (330, 370 of Chu) comprises at least one of polyimide and epoxy molding compound (polyimide; e.g. paragraph 93 of Ogihara). Re claim 18: Ogihara teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 1, further comprising a substrate (101) on which the light source (LS) is disposed, wherein side surfaces of the substrate (101) are flush with side surfaces of the upper insulation layer (104). Re claim 19: Ogihara teaches the LED pixel for a display of claim 18, wherein the substrate comprises at least one of a sapphire substrate, a SiC substrate (SiC; e.g. paragraph 93), a GaN substrate, a InGaN substrate, an AlGaN substrate, an AlN substrate, a Ga203 substrate, a glass substrate, and a silicon substrate. Re claim 20: Ogihara teaches a display apparatus, comprising: a plurality of the LED pixels (used in displays; e.g. paragraph 8) of claim 1. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ogihara in view of Shim and Chu as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Sunohara (US PGPub 2006/0040463). Re claim 11: Ogihara in view of Shim and Chu teaches substantially the entire structure as recited in claim 1 except explicitly teaching the LED pixel for a display further comprising: a second upper insulation layer disposed on the upper insulation layer; and a plurality of bumps disposed on the second upper insulation layer, wherein the bumps are electrically connected to the conductors. Sunohara teaches (e.g. fig. 11) a second upper insulation layer (19a) disposed on the upper insulation layer (18a); and a plurality of bumps (27) disposed on the second upper insulation layer (19a), wherein the bumps (27) are electrically connected to the conductors (18b). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing, absent unexpected results, to use the bump formation structure as taught by Sunohara in the device of Ogihara in order to have the predictable result of using a known structure for electrically connecting a packaged device for proper operation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSE Y MIYOSHI whose telephone number is (571)270-1629. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached on 571-272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSE Y MIYOSHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2021
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 05, 2023
Response Filed
Dec 11, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 15, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 30, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 04, 2025
Response Filed
May 08, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jul 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 14, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598761
DIODE INCLUDING A TRENCH ELECTRODE SUBDIVIDED INTO AT LEAST FIRST AND SECOND PARTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577099
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12563888
DISPLAY DEVICE WITH ENCAPSULATED QUANTUM DOT LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563713
Memory Device With Jogged Backside Metal Lines
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557573
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+19.2%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 476 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month