Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/549,497

INTERPOSER WITH A GLASS CORE THAT INCLUDES OPENINGS AND THROUGH GLASS VIAS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 13, 2021
Examiner
YAP, DOUGLAS ANTHONY
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
52 granted / 62 resolved
+15.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
104
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
85.1%
+45.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 62 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed on April 29, 2026, with respect to claim 1 and 22 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Olson. Please see 35 USC § 103 rejections of claims 1 and 22 below. Furthermore, the applicant has not responded to the objections to drawings raised in the previous office action. In summary, this application is not placed in a condition for an allowance. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: Fig. 4 of the instant application shows contacts on the bottom surface of the die 420. However, these contacts do not have the reference sign 122 as discussed in Paragraph [0030] of the Specifications. These contacts correspond to the first electrical contacts of the first side, as required in claim 1. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 3, 5-12, and 22-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US 2020/0058567 A1) in view of Olson (US 2019/0326255 A1). Regarding claim 1, Kim teaches an apparatus (12; see Fig. 1, [0028]; 12 is a substrate for mounting devices), comprising: a glass core (14, see Fig. 1, [0030]) with a first side (Figs. 1, 3A-3I: bottom side of 14) and a second side opposite (Figs. 1, 3A-3I: top side 14) the first side; an opening (22, see Fig. 3C, [0063]; also see [0062]: openings used to form vias 47) in the glass core extending from the first side to the second side (Fig. 3C shows cavity 22 and vias 47 extends from the bottom side of 14 to the top side of 14); one or more through glass vias (TGV) (47; see Figs. 3B-3I, [0062]) laterally spaced apart from the opening (as shown in Figs. 3C, each 47 is horizontally spaced apart from 22), the one or more TGV extending from the first side to the second side of the glass core (as shown in Figs. 3B-3I, 47 extends from the bottom side of 14 to the top side of 14), wherein the one or more TGV include an electrically conductive material (see [0062]) that electrically couples the first side of the glass core with the second side of the glass core (see [0062], [0068]-[0069]); a die (20; see Figs. 1, 3D-3I, [0064]) in the opening of the glass core (as shown in Fig. 3D, 20 is disposed within 22), the die having a first side (bottom side of 20) and a second side opposite the first side (top side of 20), and sidewalls (two vertical sidewalls of 20) between the first side and the second side, and the die having one or more first electrical contacts (23, see ¶ 0040) on the first side (Fig. 1 shows 23 on the bottom side of 20); and the die having one or more second electrical contacts (21, see ¶ [0040]) on the second side; and a dielectric layer (16, see Figs.1 & 3E and [0065] and [0041]: “a portion of the first dielectric layer 16 can form the encapsulant 24”) continuous along the sidewalls of the die (Fig. 3E shows 16 is a layer spanning uninterruptedly along surfaces of the two vertical sidewalls of 20), on the second side of the die and on the second side of the glass core (Fig. 3E shows 16 placed directly above the top surface of 20 and top surface of 14). However, Kim does not teach: wherein the one or more second electrical contacts of the die are through the dielectric layer. Olson, in the same field of invention, teaches one or more second electrical contacts (40 & 43 & 45, see Fig. 1D and ¶ [0036] ) of a die (24; see ¶ [0030] ), wherein the one or more second electrical contacts of the die are through the dielectric layer (62; Fig. 3A shows 40, 43, and 45 are vertically protruding through the dielectric layer 62; ¶ [0048]: 62 is non-conductive, hence a dielectric ). A person of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective date of the claimed invention, will find it obvious to combine the teachings of Olson into the device of Kim to protrude one or more second electrical contacts of the die through the dielectric layer. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Kim in the manner set forth above for at least the purpose of making a fully molded semiconductor package (Olson ¶ [0002]) that requires connecting one or more of the second electrical contacts of the die to an interconnect layer (106; see Fig. 2D), using a carrier (56, see Fig. 2A), with the method of making said package resulting in reduced manufacturing cost and improved device reliability (¶ [0029], ¶ [0069], ¶ [0070] ). Regarding claim 3, The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more TGV are filled with an electrically conductive material (Kim ¶ [0062]). Regarding claim 6, The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a first distance between the first side and the second side of the first die perpendicular to the first side of the first die (Kim Fig. 3D: the vertical height of 20, measured between the top of 20 to the bottom of 20 is the first distance), and a second distance between the first side of the second side of the glass core perpendicular to the first side of the glass core (Fig. 3D: the vertical height of 14, measured between the top of 14 and the bottom of 14 is the second distance) are the same ([0036]: “each die 20 can have a die height measured in a direction orthogonal to the outer surface 32 of the first dielectric layer 16 that is no greater than a height of the cavity 22 within which the die is disposed”). Regarding claim 8, The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first side of the glass core and the first side of the die are on a substrate (52&54; see Kim Figs. 1, 3H-3I, [0045], [0066], [0070]). Regarding claim 9, The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the die is a plurality of dies (as shown in Kim Fig. 1, there are two dies 20; also see [0028]). Regarding claim 10, The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the opening is a plurality of openings (Kim Fig. 3C, [0063], 22, and [0062]: openings used to form vias 47; alternatively, as shown in Fig. 1, there are two dies 20 in separate cavities 22). Regarding claim 11, The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the opening is surrounded by the glass core (as shown in Kim Fig. 3C, opening 22 and the openings where vias 47 are deposited are surrounded by glass core 14). Regarding claim 12, The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the opening 22 is at an edge (E1&E2; see Examiner Fig. 1) of the glass core (as shown in Examiner Fig. 1, opening 22 is at the edges E1 & E2 of 14). PNG media_image1.png 170 488 media_image1.png Greyscale Examiner Fig. 1. Taken from Kim Fig. 3C. Regarding claim 22, Kim teaches a package (10, see Fig. 1, [0028]) comprising: an interposer (12; see [0028]: 12 is a substrate for mounting devices 30 and with interconnects 28, vias 47, and bridge die 20 used for connecting devices 30; hence 12 is an interposer) comprising: a glass core (14, see Fig. 1, [0030]) with a first side (Figs. 1, 3A-3I: top side of 14) and a second side (Figs. 1, 3A-3I: bottom side 14) opposite the first side; an opening (22, see Fig. 3C, [0063]; also [0062]: openings used to form vias 47) in the glass core extending from the first side to the second side (Fig. 3C shows 22 extends from top side to bottom side of 14); one or more through glass vias (TGV) (47, see Figs. 3B-3I, [0062]) laterally spaced apart from the opening (as shown in Figs. 3C, each 47 is horizontally spaced apart from 22), the one or more TGV extending from the first side to the second side of the glass core (as shown in Figs. 3B-3I, 47 extends from top side to bottom side of 14), wherein the one or more TGV include an electrically conductive material (see [0062]) that electrically couples the first side of the glass core with the second side of the glass core ([0062], [0068]-[0069]); and a first die (20, see Figs. 1, 3D-3I, [0064]) with a first side (top side of 20) and a second side (bottom side of 20) opposite the first side, and sidewalls (two vertical sidewalls of 20) between the first side and the second side, the first die disposed within the opening of the glass core (as shown in Fig. 3D, 20 is disposed within 22), wherein the first side of the first die is at the first side of the glass core (as shown in Figs. 1, 3D-3I, the top of 20 is on the same side as the top of 14), and the second side of the first die is at the second side of the glass core (as shown in Figs. 1, 3D-3I, the bottom of 20 is on the same side as the bottom of 14), and wherein a first side of the first die includes one or more electrical connections (21; Fig. 1 shows 21 on the top side of 20), and wherein the first die has one or more electrical contacts (23) on the second side (Fig. 1 shows 23 on the bottom side of 20), the one or more electrical contacts opposite the one or more electrical connections (Fig. 1 shows 23 on the bottom side of 20, which is opposite the top side of 20, with the top side of 20 having 21); a second die (30a, see Fig. 1, [0047]) having a first side (bottom side of 30a) and a second side (top side of 30a) opposite the first side, and sidewalls (vertical sidewalls of 30a) between the first side and the second side, the second die electrically coupled with at least one of the TGV ([0043]: “46 can be electrically connected to additional patterned conductive layers, devices, conductive pads, etc. using one or more conductive vias 47”) and electrically coupled with at least one of the one or more electrical connections of the first die ([0028]: “the devices 30 are electrically connected to one or more of the dies 20”; see also Fig. 1), the second die physically coupled with the interposer ([0046]; as shown in Fig. 1, 30a is on top of 12); and a dielectric layer (16, see Fig. 3E and [0065] and [0041]: “a portion of the first dielectric layer 16 can form the encapsulant 24”) continuous along the sidewalls of the first die (Fig. 3E shows 16 is a layer spanning uninterruptedly along the surfaces of the two vertical sidewalls of 20), on the first side of the first die (Fig. 3E shows 16 placed on the top side of 20), and on the first side of the glass core (Fig. 3E shows 16 placed on the top side of 14) . However, Kim does not teach: wherein the one or more electrical connections of the die are through the dielectric layer. Olson, in the same field of invention, teaches one or more electrical connections (40 & 43 & 45, see Fig. 1D and ¶ [0036] ) of a die (24; see ¶ [0030]) are through the dielectric layer (62; Fig. 3A shows 40, 43, and 45 are vertically protruding through the dielectric layer 62; ¶ [0048]: 62 is non-conductive, hence a dielectric). A person of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective date of the claimed invention, will find it obvious to combine the teachings of Olson into the device of Kim to protrude one or more electrical connections of the die through the dielectric layer. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Kim in the manner set forth above for at least the purpose of making a fully molded semiconductor package (Olson ¶ [0002]) that requires connecting one or more of the second electrical contacts of the die to an interconnect layer (106; see Fig. 2D), using a carrier (56, see Fig. 2A), with the method of making said package resulting in reduced manufacturing cost and improved device reliability (¶ [0029], ¶ [0069], ¶ [0070] ). Regarding claim 23, the package of claim 22, further comprising a third die 30b electrically coupled with at least one of the TGV ([0043]; also Kim Fig. 1 shows 30b connected to 47 through 46) and electrically coupled with at least one of the one or more electrical connections of the first die 20 ([0028], [0040]; as shown in Fig. 1, 30b is connected to 20 through 60), the third die physically coupled with the interposer ([0046]; as shown in Fig. 1, 30b is on top of 12). Regarding claim 24, the package of claim 22, wherein the opening in the glass core of the interposer is at an edge E1&E2 of the glass core (as shown in Examiner Fig. 1 in claim 12 rejection above, opening 22 is at the edges E1 & E2 of 14). Claim 2, 7, and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US 2020/0058567 A1) in view of Olson (US 2019/0326255 A1) as applied to claims 1 and 22 above, and further in view of Pietambaram (US 2020/0006232 A1). Regarding claim 2, Kim et al. teach the apparatus of claim 1 but do not teach the apparatus wherein the electrically conductive material includes copper. Pietambaram, in the same field of invention, teaches a semiconductor device 200 (Fig. 2, [0041]) wherein the electrically conductive material of a through glass via 232 ([0041], also shown as 332 in Figs. 3D-3M) includes copper ([0066]). A person of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective date of the claimed invention, will find it obvious to combine the teachings of Pietambaram into the device of Kim et al. to use copper as the electrically conductive material of a through glass via in an apparatus at least comprising of a glass core, an opening in the glass core, and the said through glass via proximally located in the opening. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Kim et al. in the manner set forth above for at least the purpose of substituting the unnamed conductive material of Kim with a material recognized in the art as an equivalence for the same purpose of providing conductivity. See MPEP 2144.06 (I). Regarding claim 7, Kim et al. teach the apparatus of claim 1 but do not teach the apparatus wherein a value of a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the die and a value of a CTE of the glass core are a same value. Pietambaram, in the same field of invention, teaches a device 200 (Fig. 2, [0041]) having a glass core 230 (¶ [0041]) and a die 240 (¶ [0042]) wherein a value of a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the die and a value of a CTE of the glass core are a same value. ([0036]: “Furthermore, the glass components may be tailored to match the CTE of the multi-chip components”; see also [0037], [0046] and [0047]) A person of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective date of the claimed invention, will find it obvious to combine the teachings of Pietambaram into the device of Kim et al. to provide a CTE value of the die to be the same as a CTE value of the glass core in an apparatus at least comprising of a glass core, an opening in the glass core, and a through glass via proximally located in the opening. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Kim et al. in the manner set forth above for at least the purpose of reducing die warpage by matching the CTEs of various materials in the package (Pietambaram [0003], [0036]-[0037]). Regarding claim 25, Kim et al. teach the package of claim 22, but do not teach wherein the electrically conductive material includes copper. Pietambaram, in the same field of invention, teaches a semiconductor package 200 (Fig. 2, [0041]) wherein the electrically conductive material of a through glass via 232 ([0041], also shown as 332 in Figs. 3D-3M) includes copper ([0066]). A person of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective date of the claimed invention, will find it obvious to combine the teachings of Pietambaram into the device of Kim et al. to use copper as the electrically conductive material of a through glass via in an apparatus at least comprising of a glass core, an opening in the glass core, and the said through glass via proximally located in the opening. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Kim et al. in the manner set forth above for at least the purpose of substituting the unnamed conductive material of Kim with a material recognized in the art as an equivalence for the same purpose of providing conductivity. See MPEP 2144.06 (I). Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US 2020/0058567 A1) in view of Olson (US 2019/0326255 A1) as applied to claims 1 above, and further in view of Huang (US 2019/0313524 A1). Regarding claim 4, Kim et al. teach the apparatus of claim 1, but do not teach wherein a diameter of one of the one or more TGV is less than 25 μm, and wherein a pitch of the one or more TGV is less than 50 μm. Huang, in the same field of invention, a glass substrate 100 (Fig. 1, [0125]) used as interposers in electronic devices (¶ [0003]) wherein a diameter of one of the one or more TGV 110 (¶ [0124]) is less than 25 μm (¶ [0206]), and wherein a pitch of the one or more TGV is less than 50 μm (¶ [0207]). A person of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective date of the claimed invention, will find it obvious to combine the teachings of Huang into the device of Kim et al. to provide at least one TGV having a diameter less than 25 μm and a pitch less than 50 μm in an apparatus at least comprising of a glass core, an opening in the glass core, and a through glass via proximally located in the opening. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Kim et al. in the manner set forth above for at least the purpose of optimizing approaching ranges of the diameter and pitch of the via to prevent radial cracking (Huang [0207]) and surface stress (Huang Fig. 7, [0177]) through routine experimentation (Huang [0169]-[0209], Figs. 5-9). See MPEP § 2144.05 (I) and (II) (A). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Koh (US 2019/0304914 A1) also teaches contacts (126) of die (120) that protrude through a dielectric layer (128). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS YAP whose telephone number is (703)756-1946. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Zandra Smith can be reached at (571) 272-2429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOUGLAS YAP/Assistant Examiner, Art Unit 2899 /ZANDRA V SMITH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Aug 28, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685119
REVERSED HIGH ASPECT RATIO CONTACT (HARC) STRUCTURE AND PROCESS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672541
SUBSTRATE COMPRISING A LID STRUCTURE, PACKAGE SUBSTRATE COMPRISING THE SAME AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665163
MICROCHIPS FOR USE IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPES AND RELATED METHODS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652909
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12628573
TRIMMING INTERMEDIATE CARBON LAYER TO ACHIEVE NANOMETER SCALE PATTERNING
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.9%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 62 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month