Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/554,456

ISO-LEVEL VIAS FOR ADVANCED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURE FABRICATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 17, 2021
Examiner
MILLER, ALEXANDER MICHAEL
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allow Rate
1 granted / 1 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Strong +100% interview lift
Without
With
+100.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
49
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 30 January 2026 has been entered. Claim and Specification Status The Examiner acknowledges the amendments to claims 1 and 6 in the Applicant’s response dated 7 January 2026. The claim amendments and the Applicant’s accompanying comments have been addressed below. The Examiner acknowledges the amendments to withdrawn claims 11 and 16 in the Applicant’s response dated 7 January 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Guillaume Bouche (US 2019/0206795 A1; hereinafter “Bouche”) in view of Charles H. Wallace et al. (US 2019/0206728 A1; hereinafter “Wallace”) and in further view of Hsueh-Chung Chen et al. (US 2019/0139823 A1; hereinafter “Chen”). Regarding Claim 1, Bouche teaches an integrated circuit structure, comprising: an interlayer dielectric layer (110, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes a dielectric layer in an integrated circuit structure); and a plurality of parallel conductive lines in the interlayer dielectric layer (160, 161 and 165, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes metal lines formed of conductive material), the plurality of parallel conductive lines comprising a first conductive line and a second conductive line (161 and 160, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes metal lines 160 and 161 wherein the first conductive line can be seen as line 161 at the top of Fig. 10A and the second conductive line 161 can be seen at the bottom of Fig. 10A (see annotated Fig. 10A (I))), the first conductive line comprising breaks therein with first and second dielectric plugs separating portions of the first conductive line (Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes wherein the metal lines 161 are formed in trenches of the dielectric layer 110 wherein the gaps between the first conductive line therefore comprise first and second dielectric plugs IP as shown in annotated Fig. 10A (II)), wherein one of the portions of the first conductive line is between the first dielectric plug and the second dielectric plug and has a first dimension (annotated Fig. 10A (II) depicts wherein a middle portion of the first conductive line is between the first and second dielectric plugs IP), and the second conductive line comprising first and second conductive line portions separated by an intervening conductive via structure (160 and 165, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes a metal island 165 in between two conductive line portions 160, wherein the metal island is a portion of the metal via 184 and 182 as depicted in Fig. 13), the conductive via structure separated from the first and second conductive line portions (160 and 165, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes a metal island in between two conductive lines that is electrically isolated from the metal lines by the dielectric layer), and the conductive via structure having a second dimension parallel with the first dimension (Lm, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes a length of the metal island in a direction parallel with the first dimension (see annotated Fig. 10A (II) below)). PNG media_image1.png 479 702 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 479 702 media_image2.png Greyscale Bouche fails to explicitly disclose wherein the second dimension is less than the first dimension. However, Bouche teaches in the disclosure of their invention, wherein the metal island, which acts as part of a “super via” (para [0030]) and comprises a second dimension (Lm), is the result of a unique process for decreasing the size of metal lines to overcome existing fabrication limitations, wherein the resulting metal island is 15 nm or less (Bouche, para [0028]). The first metal line 161 is not a result of the unique fabrication process, resulting in a metal line that is larger than 15 nm. The disclosure further displays different metal lines 161 of varying length in comparison to one another in Fig. 10A. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to try different size first metal lines 161, and further reduce the size of the metal island via 165 below 15 nm, resulting in a second dimension that is less than the first dimension, in order to provide the advantage of overcoming limitations of existing fabrication equipment in meeting design requirements for newer and even smaller metal line features (Bouche, para [0002]) see MPEP 2144.04 (IV)(A), and MPEP 2144.05 (II)(A)(B). Bouche fails to explicitly disclose wherein the first and second dielectric plugs comprise a material different than the interlayer dielectric layer. However, Wallace teaches a similar integrated circuit structure, wherein the first and second dielectric plugs comprise a material different than the interlayer dielectric layer (130, Fig. 1, para [0022] describes dielectric plugs 130 comprised between conductive lines 103 wherein dielectric plugs 130 are of a different material composition that is distinct from that of dielectric lines 110, wherein para [0019] describes dielectric lines 110 are comprised of a same composition as an interlayer dielectric layer 105). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bouche and Wallace to further disclose an integrated circuit structure wherein first and second dielectric plugs are comprised of a material different than the interlayer dielectric layer to provide the well-known advantage of enabling the plug material and trench material to be comprised of materials having different etch selectivity so that subsequent processing steps can be selective to either the plug material or the interlayer dielectric layer material. The combination of Bouche and Wallace fail to explicitly disclose wherein the conductive via structure is overlapping with the one of the portions of the first conductive line along a horizontal axis, the horizontal axis orthogonal to the plurality of parallel conductive lines. However, Chen teaches a similar integrated circuit structure, wherein the conductive via structure is overlapping with the one of the portions of the first conductive line along a horizontal axis, the horizontal axis orthogonal to the plurality of parallel conductive lines (130A, Fig. 12, para [0037] describes conductive vias 130A -130C wherein at least conductive via 130A overlaps a first conductive line 105C along a horizontal axis orthogonal to the plurality of parallel conductive lines 105). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bouche and Wallace with Chen to further disclose an integrated circuit structure wherein a conductive via structure overlaps a portion of a first parallel conductive line so as to provide the well-known advantage of increasing interconnect line density and via density by requiring less dielectric spacing between adjacent interconnect lines and vias enabling a higher underlying transistor density improving device performance. Regarding Claim 2, the combination of Bouche, Wallace and Chen discloses all the limitations of claim 1. Bouche, Wallace and Chen fail to explicitly disclose the integrated circuit structure of claim 1, wherein the first dimension is more than 50% greater than the second dimension. However, Bouche teaches in the disclosure of their invention, wherein the metal island, which acts as part of a “super via” (para [0030]), is the result of a unique process for decreasing the size of metal lines to overcome existing fabrication limitations, wherein the resulting metal island is 15 nm or less (Bouche, para [0028]). The first metal line 161 is not a result of the unique fabrication process, resulting in a metal line that is larger than 15 nm. The disclosure further displays different metal lines 161 of varying length in comparison to one another in Fig. 10A. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to try different size first metal lines 161, and further reduce the size of the metal island via 165 below 15 nm, resulting in a first dimension that is more than 50% greater than the second dimension, in order to provide the advantage of overcoming limitations of existing fabrication equipment in meeting design requirements for newer and even smaller metal line features (Bouche, para [0002]) see MPEP 2144.04 (IV)(A), and MPEP 2144.05 (II)(A)(B). Regarding Claim 3, the combination of Bouche, Wallace and Chen discloses all the limitations of claim 1. Bouche, Wallace and Chen fail to explicitly disclose the integrated circuit structure of claim 1, wherein the first dimension is at least twice the second dimension. However, Bouche teaches in the disclosure of their invention, wherein the metal island, which acts as part of a “super via” (para [0030]), is the result of a unique process for decreasing the size of metal lines to overcome existing fabrication limitations, wherein the resulting metal island is 15 nm or less (Bouche, para [0028]). The first metal line 161 is not a result of the unique fabrication process, resulting in a metal line that is larger than 15 nm. The disclosure further displays different metal lines 161 of varying length in comparison to one another in Fig. 10A. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to try different size first metal lines 161, and further reduce the size of the metal island via 165 below 15 nm, resulting in a first dimension that is at least twice the second dimension, in order to provide the advantage of overcoming limitations of existing fabrication equipment in meeting design requirements for newer and even smaller metal line features (Bouche, para [0002]) see MPEP 2144.04 (IV)(A), and MPEP 2144.05 (II)(A)(B). Regarding Claim 4, the combination of Bouche, Wallace and Chen teaches the integrated circuit structure of claim 1, wherein the conductive via structure is separated from the first and second conductive line portions by third and fourth dielectric plugs, respectively (Bouche, IP2, annotated Fig. 10A (III) below, wherein there exists breaks between the metal line 160 and the metal island via 165 that is filled with dielectric material creating third and fourth dielectric plugs IP2). PNG media_image3.png 479 702 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 5, the combination of Bouche, Wallace and Chen teaches the integrated circuit structure of claim 1, wherein the conductive via structure is a pass through structure and is coupled to an underlying diffusion region in a substrate (Chen, 130A-130C, Fig. 12, para [0034] describes wherein conductive via 130A is conductively coupled to a source/drain region 120 in a substrate region 102 wherein the via structures 130A-130B pass through at least an insulating layer 122 and etch stop layer 123). Regarding Claim 6, Bouche discloses an integrated circuit structure, comprising: an interlayer dielectric layer (110, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes a dielectric layer in an integrated circuit structure); and a plurality of parallel conductive lines in the interlayer dielectric layer (161, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes metal lines formed of conductive material), the plurality of parallel conductive lines comprising: a first conductive line (161, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes metal line 161 wherein the first conductive line can be seen as line 161 at the top of Fig. 10A (see annotated Fig. 10A (I) above)) comprising breaks therein with first and second dielectric plugs separating portions of the first conductive line, and wherein one of the portions of the first conductive line is between the first dielectric plug and the second dielectric plug and has a first dimension (IP from annotated Fig. 10A (I), Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes wherein the meal lines 161 are formed in trenches of the dielectric layer 110 wherein the gaps between the first conductive line therefore comprise dielectric plugs and there being a first dimension of the first conductive line between the first dielectric plug and the second dielectric plug (see annotated Fig. 10A (I) above)); a second conductive line (161, Fig. 10A, para [0028] a second conductive line below the first conductive line (see annotated Fig. 10A (IV) below)) a third conductive line comprising first and second conductive line portions separated by an intervening conductive via structure (160 and 165, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes a metal island 165 in between two conductive line portions 160, wherein the metal island is a portion of the metal via 184 and 182 as depicted in Fig. 13 further forming a “super via” in combination as described in para [0030]), the conductive via structure separated from the first and second conductive line portions (160 and 165, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes a metal island in between two conductive lines that is electrically isolated from the metal lines by the dielectric layer), and the conductive via structure having a second dimension parallel with the first dimension (Lm, Fig. 10A, para [0028] describes a length of the metal island in a direction parallel with the first dimension (see annotated Fig. 10A (II) above)). PNG media_image4.png 479 702 media_image4.png Greyscale Bouche fails to explicitly disclose wherein the second dimension is less than the first dimension. However, Bouche teaches in the disclosure of their invention, wherein the metal island, which acts as part of a “super via” (para [0030]) and comprises a second dimension (Lm), is the result of a unique process for decreasing the size of metal lines to overcome existing fabrication limitations, wherein the resulting metal island is 15 nm or less (Bouche, para [0028]). The first metal line 161 is not a result of the unique fabrication process, resulting in a metal line that is larger than 15 nm. The disclosure further displays different metal lines 161 of varying length in comparison to one another in Fig. 10A. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to try different size first metal lines 161, and further reduce the size of the metal island via 165 below 15 nm, resulting in a second dimension that is less than the first dimension, in order to provide the advantage of overcoming limitations of existing fabrication equipment in meeting design requirements for newer and even smaller metal line features (Bouche, para [0002]) see MPEP 2144.04 (IV)(A), and MPEP 2144.05 (II)(A)(B). Bouche fails to disclose wherein the first and second dielectric plugs comprise a material different than the interlayer dielectric layer, a fourth conductive line continuous along the third conductive line; and a fifth conductive line comprising breaks therein with third and fourth dielectric plugs separating portions of the fifth conductive line, wherein the third and fourth dielectric plugs comprise a material different than the interlayer dielectric layer, one of the portions between the third dielectric plug and the fourth dielectric plug and having the first dimension. However, Wallace teaches a similar integrated circuit structure, wherein the first and second dielectric plugs comprise a material different than the interlayer dielectric layer (130, Fig. 1, para [0022] describes dielectric plugs 130 comprised between conductive lines 103 wherein dielectric plugs 130 are of a different material composition that is distinct from that of dielectric lines 110, wherein para [0019] describes dielectric lines 110 are comprised of a same composition as an interlayer dielectric layer 105), a fourth conductive line (FCL, annotated Fig. 1 below) continuous along the third conductive line; and a fifth conductive line (HCL, annotated Fig. 1 below) comprising breaks therein with third (130A, Fig. 1, para [0020] describes a dielectric plug 130A) and fourth dielectric plugs (130, Fig. 1, para [0020] describes a dielectric plug 130) separating portions of the fifth conductive line, wherein the third and fourth dielectric plugs comprise a material different than the interlayer dielectric layer (para [0022] describes dielectric plugs 130 comprised between conductive lines 103 wherein dielectric plugs 130 are of a different material composition that is distinct from that of dielectric lines 110, wherein para [0019] describes dielectric lines 110 are comprised of a same composition as an interlayer dielectric layer 105), one of the portions between the third dielectric plug and the fourth dielectric plug and having the first dimension (FD, annotated Fig. 1 below). PNG media_image5.png 520 648 media_image5.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bouche and Wallace to further disclose an integrated circuit structure wherein first and second dielectric plugs are comprised of a material different than the interlayer dielectric layer to provide the well-known advantage of enabling the plug material and trench material to be comprised of materials having different etch selectivity so that subsequent processing steps can be selective to either the plug material or the trench material and to further disclose a fourth and fifth conductive line to provide the advantage of enabling the device to couple additional active devices to the integrated circuit (Wallace, para [0019]). The combination of Bouche and Wallace fail to explicitly disclose wherein the second conductive line is continuous along the first conductive line; and wherein the conductive via structure is overlapping with the one of the portions of the first conductive line along a horizontal axis, the horizontal axis orthogonal to the plurality of parallel conductive lines. However, Chen teaches a similar integrated circuit structure, wherein the second conductive line is continuous along the first conductive line (105E, Fig. 12, para [0022] describes a conductive line 105E which may comprise a second conductive line that is continuous along a first conductive line 105C); and wherein the conductive via structure is overlapping with the one of the portions of the first conductive line along a horizontal axis, the horizontal axis orthogonal to the plurality of parallel conductive lines (130A, Fig. 12, para [0037] describes conductive vias 130A -130C wherein at least conductive via 130A overlaps first conductive line 105C along a horizontal axis orthogonal to the plurality of parallel conductive lines 105). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bouche and Wallace with Chen to disclose an integrated circuit structure wherein a second conductive line is continuous along a first conductive line in order to provide the well-known advantage of providing a conductive contact for interconnects and via structures which overlap with dielectric plugs of a first conductive line structure enabling for a higher density of transistors in an integrated circuit device improving device performance and to further disclose an integrated circuit structure wherein a conductive via structure overlaps a portion of a first parallel conductive line so as to provide the well-known advantage of increasing interconnect line density and via density by requiring less dielectric spacing between adjacent interconnect lines and vias enabling a higher underlying transistor density improving device performance. Regarding Claim 7, the combination of Bouche, Wallace and Chen discloses all the limitations of claim 6. Bouche, Wallace and Chen fail to explicitly disclose the integrated circuit structure of claim 6, wherein the first dimension is more than 50% greater than the second dimension. However, Bouche teaches in the disclosure of their invention, wherein the metal island, which acts as part of a “super via” (para [0030]), is the result of a unique process for decreasing the size of metal lines to overcome existing fabrication limitations, wherein the resulting metal island is 15 nm or less. The first metal line 161 is not a result of the unique fabrication process, resulting in a metal line that is larger than 15 nm. The disclosure further displays different metal lines 161 of varying length in comparison to one another in Fig. 10A. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to try different size first metal lines 161, and further reduce the size of the metal island via 165 below 15 nm, resulting in a first dimension that is more than 50% greater than the second dimension, in order to provide the advantage of overcoming limitations of existing fabrication equipment in meeting design requirements for newer and even smaller metal line features (Bouche, para [0002]) see MPEP 2144.04 (IV)(A), and MPEP 2144.05 (II)(A)(B). Regarding Claim 8, the combination of Bouche, Wallace and Chen discloses all the limitations of claim 6. Bouche, Wallace and Chen fail to explicitly disclose the integrated circuit structure of claim 6, wherein the first dimension is at least twice the second dimension. However, Bouche teaches in the disclosure of their invention, wherein the metal island, which acts as part of a “super via” (para [0030]), is the result of a unique process for decreasing the size of metal lines to overcome existing fabrication limitations, wherein the resulting metal island is 15 nm or less. The first metal line 161 is not a result of the unique fabrication process, resulting in a metal line that is larger than 15 nm. The disclosure further displays different metal lines 161 of varying length in comparison to one another in Fig. 10A. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to try different size first metal lines 161, and further reduce the size of the metal island via 165 below 15 nm, resulting in a first dimension that is at least twice the second dimension, in order to provide the advantage of overcoming limitations of existing fabrication equipment in meeting design requirements for newer and even smaller metal line features (Bouche, para [0002]) see MPEP 2144.04 (IV)(A), and MPEP 2144.05 (II)(A)(B). Regarding Claim 9, the combination of Bouche, Wallace and Chen teaches the integrated circuit structure of claim 6, wherein the conductive via structure is separated from the first and second conductive line portions by fifth and sixth dielectric plugs, respectively (Bouche, IP2, annotated Fig. 10A (III) above, wherein there exists breaks between the metal line 160 and the metal island via 165 that is filled with dielectric material creating fifth and sixth dielectric plugs IP2). Regarding Claim 10, the combination of Bouche, Wallace and Chen teaches the integrated circuit structure of claim 6, wherein the conductive via structure is a pass through structure and is coupled to an underlying diffusion region in a substrate (Chen, 130A-130C, Fig. 12, para [0034] describes wherein conductive via 130A is conductively coupled to a source/drain region 120 in a substrate region 102 wherein the via structures 130A-130B pass through at least an insulating layer 122 and etch stop layer 123). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 and 6 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER M MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-6051. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at 571(272)-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER MICHAEL MILLER/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 /JULIO J MALDONADO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2021
Application Filed
Nov 02, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 30, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593660
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 1 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+100.0%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month