Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/559,493

WRAP-AROUND LABEL FOR SSD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 22, 2021
Examiner
SEHAR, FAKEHA
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK Hynix Nand Product Solutions Corp. (Dba Solidigm)
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
74 granted / 87 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
133
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 87 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on December 12, 2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment This Office Action is in response to Applicant’s Amendment filed on December 12, 2025. Claims 1 and 8 have been amended. No new claims have been added. Claims 15-20 have been withdrawn. No claims have been canceled. Currently, claims 1-14 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 and 8 have been considered but are moot as applied to the newly added claim limitations because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lunsman et al. (US 10,667,431 B1; hereafter Lunsman) in view of Pax (US 2019/0348341 A1). Regarding claim 1, Lunsman teaches a solid state drive (see e.g., memory module 20 enclosed by a thermal interface device 10, Figures 1-4) comprising: a printed circuit board including a top surface positioned opposite from a back surface (see e.g., memory module 20 includes a board 21 including a top surface positioned opposite from a back surface, Column 8, Lines 5-10, Figures 1-4), the printed circuit board further including one or more memory chips disposed on the top surface (see e.g., memory chips 22 are disposed on the surface of the board 21, Column 8, Lines 5-10, Figures 1-4); and a thermal label, the thermal label being continuously wrapped around the printed circuit board (thermal interface device 10 includes an outer part 100 and an inner part 200. they both have a pair of side segments (outer side segments 110 or inner side segments 210) that face one another and are connected together by a top segment (outer top segment 120 or inner top segment 220), so as to have a roughly U-shaped cross-section (see FIGS. 2, 4, 6, and 9). When installed, the inner part 200 is nested within the outer part 100, with a memory module 20 located between the inner side segments 210L/R, Column 4, Lines 13-34, Figures 1-4). Lunsman does not explicitly teach “a thermal label comprising an adhesive backing layer, …. such that the adhesive backing layer on a first portion of the thermal label is adhered to the one or more memory chips disposed on the top surface of the printed circuit board and the adhesive backing layer on a second portion of the thermal label is adhered to the back surface of the printed circuit board”. In a similar field of endeavor Pax teaches a thermal label comprising an adhesive backing layer, …. such that the adhesive backing layer on a first portion of the thermal label is adhered to the one or more memory chips disposed on the top surface of the printed circuit board and the adhesive backing layer on a second portion of the thermal label is adhered to the back surface of the printed circuit board (see e.g., the heat spreader 410 is coupled to the memories 104a and 104b and wraps around the upper edge 105b of the substrate 102. More particularly, (i) the first portion 420 of the heat spreader 410 is generally planar and coupled to the first memories 104a on the front side 103a of the substrate 102 via an adhesive 516, (ii) the second portion 422 of the heat spreader 410 is generally planar and coupled to the second memories 104b on the second side 103b of the substrate 102 via the adhesive 516, and (iii) the third portion 424 of the heat spreader 410 is generally curved and extends around the upper edge 105b of the substrate 102, Para [0033], Figure 5C). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Pax’s teachings of a thermal label comprising an adhesive backing layer, …. such that the adhesive backing layer on a first portion of the thermal label is adhered to the one or more memory chips disposed on the top surface of the printed circuit board and the adhesive backing layer on a second portion of the thermal label is adhered to the back surface of the printed circuit board in the device of Lunsman in order to avoid peeling or weakening of the thermal coupling between the heat spreader and the memory devices on the circuit board. Regarding claim 7, Lunsman, as modified by Pax, teaches the limitations of claim 1 as mentioned above. Lunsman further teaches wherein the printed circuit board is sized to accommodate application of the thermal label to the top surface and the back surface of the printed circuit board while maintaining an overall side thickness of the solid state drive consistent with a first form factor (see e.g., the outer part 100 may be formed from a single piece of sheet metal that is worked (e.g., bent, cut, stamped, etc.) to form the two side segments 110 connected by the top segment 120. The planar portions of the outer segments 110 maybe between 0.1mm and 0.5mm thick. The inner part 200 may be formed from a single piece of sheet metal that is worked (e.g., bent, cut, stamped, etc.) to form the two side segments 210 connected by the top segment 220. In some examples, the inner side segments 210 may be between 0.05 mm and 0.50 mm thick, Column 6, Lines 14-25, Lines 60-67, column 7, Lines 1-2, Figures 1-4). Claims 2-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lunsman et al. (US 10,667,431 B1; hereafter Lunsman) in view of in view of Pax (US 2019/0348341 A1) and further in view of Chen et al. (CN 203554777U; hereafter Chen). Regarding claim 2, Lunsman, as modified by Pax, teaches the limitations of claim 1 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a side surface extending perpendicular to the top surface and the back surface; and a transitional edge extending from the side surface to the back surface”. In a similar field of endeavor Chen teaches wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a side surface extending perpendicular to the top surface and the back surface (see e.g., the circuit board 1 has a side surface extending perpendicular to the top and back surface as shown in modified Figure 14); and a transitional edge extending from the side surface to the back surface (see e.g., the circuit board 1 has a transitional edge extending from the side surface to the back surface as shown in modified Figure 4). PNG media_image1.png 302 604 media_image1.png Greyscale Modified Figure 4, Chen Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Chen’s teachings of wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a side surface extending perpendicular to the top surface and the back surface; and a transitional edge extending from the side surface to the back surface in the device of Lunsman in order to reduce the charge density at the edge of the circuit board and avoid generating metal plating layer which is thickened at the edge of the circuit board. Regarding claim 3, Lunsman, as modified by Pax and Chen, teaches the limitations of claim 2 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “wherein the transitional edge is a chamfered edge”. In a similar field of endeavor Chen teaches wherein the transitional edge is a chamfered edge (see e.g., the transitional edge is chamfered as shown in modified Figure 4, Para [0009]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Chen’s teachings of wherein the transitional edge is a chamfered edge in the device of Lunsman in order to reduce the charge density at the edge of the circuit board and avoid generating metal plating layer which is thickened at the edge of the circuit board. Regarding claim 4, Lunsman, as modified by Pax and Chen, teaches the limitations of claim 3 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a second transitional edge extending from the side surface to the top surface”. In a similar field of endeavor Chen teaches wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a second transitional edge extending from the side surface to the top surface (see e.g., the circuit board 1 has a second transitional edge extending from the side surface to the top surface as shown in modified Figure 4) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Chen’s teachings of a second transitional edge extending from the side surface to the top surface in the device of Lunsman in order to reduce the charge density at the edge of the circuit board and avoid generating metal plating layer which is thickened at the edge of the circuit board. Claims 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lunsman et al. (US 10,667,431 B1; hereafter Lunsman) in view of in view of Pax (US 2019/0348341 A1) and further in view of Gao et al. (US 2020/0260602 A1; hereafter Gao). Regarding claim 5, Lunsman, as modified by Pax, teaches the limitations of claim 1 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “wherein the solid state drive comprises a form factor that does not exceed thirty millimeters”. In a similar field of endeavor Gao teaches (see e.g., SSD device 102 has a form factor heights varying from 5mm to 15mm, Para [0019]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Gao’s teachings wherein the solid state drive comprises a form factor that does not exceed thirty millimeters in the device of Lunsman as a small form factor allows manufacturers to build smaller, thinner and lighter electronic devices. Regarding claim 6, Lunsman, as modified by Pax, teaches the limitations of claim 1 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “further comprising: a housing including a plurality of sides surrounding an interior region, and wherein the printed circuit board is located within the interior region of the housing”. In a similar field of endeavor Gao teaches a housing including a plurality of sides surrounding an interior region (see e.g., the SSD device 102 includes a cage 104. The cage 104 has a generally rectangular configuration and includes a first (e.g., top) cage wall or plate 106 and a second (e.g., bottom) cage wall or plate 108, where the cage plates are separated from each other by a suitable distance to define a gap between the plates. The gap between the plates 106, 108 provides a partial enclosure or housing for integrated circuit components of the SSD device 102 that are provided on one or more PCBs 120, Para [0019], Figures 3-5), and wherein the printed circuit board is located within the interior region of the housing (see e.g., the PCB 120 is located within the interior region of the cage 104, Figures 3-5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Gao’s teachings of a housing including a plurality of sides surrounding an interior region, and wherein the printed circuit board is located within the interior region of the housing in the device of Lunsman in order to protect the sensitive internal components, managing heat and providing standardized form factor for physical installation. Claims 8 and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lunsman et al. (US 10,667,431 B1; hereafter Lunsman) in view of in view of Gao et al. (US 2020/0260602 A1; hereafter Gao) and Pax (US 2019/0348341 A1). Regarding claim 8, Lunsman teaches a system comprising: the solid state drive (see e.g., memory module 20 enclosed by a thermal interface device 10, Figures 1-4) comprising: a printed circuit board including a top surface positioned opposite from a back surface (see e.g., memory module 20 includes a board 21 including a top surface positioned opposite from a back surface, Column 8, Lines 5-10, Figures 1-4), the printed circuit board further including one or more memory chips disposed on the top surface (see e.g., memory chips 22 are disposed on the surface of the board 21, Column 8, Lines 5-10, Figures 1-4); and a thermal, the thermal label continuously wrapped around the printed circuit board (thermal interface device 10 includes an outer part 100 and an inner part 200. they both have a pair of side segments (outer side segments 110 or inner side segments 210) that face one another and are connected together by a top segment (outer top segment 120 or inner top segment 220), so as to have a roughly U-shaped cross-section (see FIGS. 2, 4, 6, and 9). When installed, the inner part 200 is nested within the outer part 100, with a memory module 20 located between the inner side segments 210L/R, Column 4, Lines 13-34, Figures 1-4). Lunsman does not explicitly teach a processor; and a solid state drive coupled to the processor, In a similar field of endeavor Gao teaches a processor; and (see e.g., server 40 which includes a controller/processor to control server operations, Para [0016], Figure 2) a solid state drive coupled to the processor (see e.g., the server 40 has one or more host interface connectors or ports to facilitate connection with external components such as the SSD device 2, Para [0016], Figures 2-5), Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Gao’s teachings of a processor; and a solid state drive coupled to the processor in the device of Lunsman in order to control read/write operations to the memory chips. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “a thermal label comprising an adhesive backing layer, …. such that the adhesive backing layer on a first portion of the thermal label is adhered to the one or more memory chips disposed on the top surface of the printed circuit board and the adhesive backing layer on a second portion of the thermal label is adhered to the back surface of the printed circuit board”. In a similar field of endeavor Pax teaches a thermal label comprising an adhesive backing layer, …. such that the adhesive backing layer on a first portion of the thermal label is adhered to the one or more memory chips disposed on the top surface of the printed circuit board and the adhesive backing layer on a second portion of the thermal label is adhered to the back surface of the printed circuit board (see e.g., the heat spreader 410 is coupled to the memories 104a and 104b and wraps around the upper edge 105b of the substrate 102. More particularly, (i) the first portion 420 of the heat spreader 410 is generally planar and coupled to the first memories 104a on the front side 103a of the substrate 102 via an adhesive 516, (ii) the second portion 422 of the heat spreader 410 is generally planar and coupled to the second memories 104b on the second side 103b of the substrate 102 via the adhesive 516, and (iii) the third portion 424 of the heat spreader 410 is generally curved and extends around the upper edge 105b of the substrate 102, Para [0033], Figure 5C). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Pax’s teachings of a thermal label comprising an adhesive backing layer, …. such that the adhesive backing layer on a first portion of the thermal label is adhered to the one or more memory chips disposed on the top surface of the printed circuit board and the adhesive backing layer on a second portion of the thermal label is adhered to the back surface of the printed circuit board in the device of Lunsman in order to avoid peeling or weakening of the thermal coupling between the heat spreader and the memory devices on the circuit board. Regarding claim 12, Lunsman, as modified by Gao and Pax, teaches the limitations of claim 8 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “wherein the solid state drive comprises a form factor that does not exceed thirty millimeters”. In a similar field of endeavor Gao teaches (see e.g., SSD device 102 has a form factor heights varying from 5mm to 15mm, Para [0019]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Gao’s teachings wherein the solid state drive comprises a form factor that does not exceed thirty millimeters in the device of Lunsman as a small form factor allows manufacturers to build smaller, thinner and lighter electronic devices. Regarding claim 13, Lunsman, as modified by Gao and Pax, teaches the limitations of claim 8 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “further comprising: a housing including a plurality of sides surrounding an interior region, and wherein the printed circuit board is located within the interior region of the housing”. In a similar field of endeavor Gao teaches a housing including a plurality of sides surrounding an interior region (see e.g., the SSD device 102 includes a cage 104. The cage 104 has a generally rectangular configuration and includes a first (e.g., top) cage wall or plate 106 and a second (e.g., bottom) cage wall or plate 108, where the cage plates are separated from each other by a suitable distance to define a gap between the plates. The gap between the plates 106, 108 provides a partial enclosure or housing for integrated circuit components of the SSD device 102 that are provided on one or more PCBs 120, Para [0019], Figures 3-5), and wherein the printed circuit board is located within the interior region of the housing (see e.g., the PCB 120 is located within the interior region of the cage 104, Figures 3-5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Gao’s teachings of a housing including a plurality of sides surrounding an interior region, and wherein the printed circuit board is located within the interior region of the housing in the device of Lunsman in order to protect the sensitive internal components, managing heat and providing standardized form factor for physical installation. Regarding claim 14, Lunsman, as modified by Gao and Pax, teaches the limitations of claim 8 as mentioned above. Lunsman further teaches wherein the printed circuit board is sized to accommodate application of the thermal label to the top surface and the back surface of the printed circuit board while maintaining an overall side thickness of the solid state drive consistent with a first form factor (see e.g., the outer part 100 may be formed from a single piece of sheet metal that is worked (e.g., bent, cut, stamped, etc.) to form the two side segments 110 connected by the top segment 120. The planar portions of the outer segments 110 maybe between 0.1mm and 0.5mm thick. The inner part 200 may be formed from a single piece of sheet metal that is worked (e.g., bent, cut, stamped, etc.) to form the two side segments 210 connected by the top segment 220. In some examples, the inner side segments 210 may be between 0.05 mm and 0.50 mm thick, Column 6, Lines 14-25, Lines 60-67, column 7, Lines 1-2, Figures 1-4). Claims 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lunsman et al. (US 10,667,431 B1; hereafter Lunsman) in view of in view of in view of Gao et al. (US 2020/0260602 A1; hereafter Gao) and Pax (US 2019/0348341 A1) and further in view of Chen et al. (CN 203554777U; hereafter Chen). Regarding claim 9, Lunsman, as modified by Gao and Pax, teaches the limitations of claim 8 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a side surface extending perpendicular to the top surface and the back surface; and a transitional edge extending from the side surface to the back surface”. In a similar field of endeavor Chen teaches wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a side surface extending perpendicular to the top surface and the back surface (see e.g., the circuit board 1 has a side surface extending perpendicular to the top and back surface as shown in modified Figure 14); and a transitional edge extending from the side surface to the back surface (see e.g., the circuit board 1 has a transitional edge extending from the side surface to the back surface as shown in modified Figure 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Chen’s teachings of wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a side surface extending perpendicular to the top surface and the back surface; and a transitional edge extending from the side surface to the back surface in the device of Lunsman in order to reduce the charge density at the edge of the circuit board and avoid generating metal plating layer which is thickened at the edge of the circuit board. Regarding claim 10, Lunsman, as modified by Gao, Pax and Chen, teaches the limitations of claim 9 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “wherein the transitional edge is a chamfered edge”. In a similar field of endeavor Chen teaches wherein the transitional edge is a chamfered edge (see e.g., the transitional edge is chamfered as shown in modified Figure 4, Para [0009]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Chen’s teachings of wherein the transitional edge is a chamfered edge in the device of Lunsman in order to reduce the charge density at the edge of the circuit board and avoid generating metal plating layer which is thickened at the edge of the circuit board. Regarding claim 11, Lunsman, as modified by Gao, Pax and Chen, teaches the limitations of claim 10 as mentioned above. Lunsman does not explicitly teach “wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a second transitional edge extending from the side surface to the top surface”. In a similar field of endeavor Chen teaches wherein the printed circuit board further comprises: a second transitional edge extending from the side surface to the top surface (see e.g., the circuit board 1 has a second transitional edge extending from the side surface to the top surface as shown in modified Figure 4) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement Chen’s teachings of a second transitional edge extending from the side surface to the top surface in the device of Lunsman in order to reduce the charge density at the edge of the circuit board and avoid generating metal plating layer which is thickened at the edge of the circuit board. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAKEHA SEHAR whose telephone number is (571)272-4033. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yara J. Green can be reached on (571) 270-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAKEHA SEHAR/Examiner, Art Unit 2893 /YARA B GREEN/Supervisor Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2021
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
May 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 27, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 03, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 03, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 12, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599039
LED CHIP MODULE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LED CHIP MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588269
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES INCLUDING SEPARATION STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581706
METAL-OXIDE THIN-FILM TRANSISTOR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, X-RAY DETECTOR, AND DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581650
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICES AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568621
MEMORY APPARATUS AND METHODS INCLUDING MERGED PROCESS FOR MEMORY CELL PILLAR AND SOURCE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.8%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 87 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month