Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/586,250

METHOD FOR DESIGNING SPECTACLE LENS, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SPECTACLE LENS, AND SYSTEM FOR DESIGNING SPECTACLE LENS

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Jan 27, 2022
Examiner
SUMLAR, JOURNEY F
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hoya Lens Thailand Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
401 granted / 585 resolved
+0.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
628
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 585 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because The identified claim limitations that recite an abstract idea does not fall within the enumerated groupings of abstract ideas in Section I of the 2018 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance published in the Federal Register (84 FR 50) on January 7, 2019. Nonetheless, the claim limitations are being treated as reciting an abstract idea because the method of obtaining design solutions and the design unit for obtaining design solutions are merely data collection and processing and mathematics. There are no details of how the design solution is obtained. The claims recite the limitations of designing a spectacle lens. There is nothing in the claim precludes the design step from practically being performed in the human mind or with the aid of pen and paper. Thus, this limitation is a mental process. Even though the limitation “the method comprising, performing by a computer” has been added to the claim, The mere nominal recitation of a generic computer devices does not take the claim out of the methods of a mental process since it is merely using a computer as a tool to perform the concept. Thus, the claim recites an abstract idea. Thus, this limitation is a mental process. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOURNEY F SUMLAR whose telephone number is (571)270-0656. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached on 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JOURNEY F. SUMLAR Examiner Art Unit 2872 17 January 2026 /SHARRIEF I BROOME/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Feb 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §101
Jul 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Sep 25, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 29, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 06, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 17, 2026
Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601863
OPTICAL SYSTEM AND OPTICAL APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591165
CAMERA MODULE AND MOBILE TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578616
METAOPTICS AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSES INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578614
SEMICONDUCTOR OPTICAL PHASE MODULATOR AND METHOD OF TESTING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571944
LIGHT-ABSORBING HEAT-SHIELDING FILM, LIGHT-ABSORBING HEAT-SHIELDING MEMBER, ARTICLE, AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+9.7%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 585 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month