Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/587,971

STACKED SEMICONDUCTOR DIE ASSEMBLIES WITH HIGH EFFICIENCY THERMAL PATHS AND MOLDED UNDERFILL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 28, 2022
Priority
Oct 19, 2016 — divisional of 10/008,395 +2 more
Examiner
TURNER, BRIAN
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Micron Technology Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
641 granted / 769 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
820
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
61.8%
+21.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 769 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/2/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-8 and 22-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (PG Pub. No. US 2015/0279431 A1) in view of Chen et al. (PG Pub. No. US 2015/0155221 A1) and Hong et al. (PG Pub. No. US 2015/0130078 A1). Regarding claim 1, Li teaches a semiconductor die assembly (fig. 1: 100), comprising: a package support substrate (¶ 0015: 120); a first semiconductor die (¶ 0015: 102a) carried by an upper surface of the package support substrate and having a central region and a lateral region (fig. 1: 102 carried by upper surface of 120 and a includes unlabeled central region and peripheral portion 107); a die stack (¶ 0015: 105) having one or more second semiconductor dies (¶ 0015: 103) carried by the central region of the first semiconductor die (fig. 1: 105 carried by central portion of 102a); an adhesive (¶ 0017: 114a and/or 114b) over at least a portion of the lateral region of the first semiconductor die (fig. 1: at least portion 114b over 107) extending continuously from an internal surface facing the die stack to an external surface opposite the internal surface (fig. 1: 114b continuously extends between internal and external surfaces), wherein the adhesive includes a first portion over the lateral region of the first semiconductor die and having a first thickness (fig. 1: 114b includes a portion over lateral region of 102a with a first thickness); a heat transfer structure (¶ 0030: 113) at least partially carried by the lateral region of the first semiconductor die (fig. 1: 113 carried by 107), wherein an inner-most surface of the heat transfer structure is vertically aligned with the internal surface of the adhesive, and wherein a peripheral-most surface of the heat transfer structure is vertically aligned with the external surface of the adhesive (fig. 1: inner-most surface of 113 vertically aligned with inner surface of 114b, peripheral-most surface of 113 is vertically aligned with external surface of 114b); and an underfill material (¶ 0019: 116) between the heat transfer structure and one or more outermost surfaces of the die stack (fig. 1: 116 between 113 and outermost surface of 105). Li does not teach wherein the adhesive includes a vent channel extending from the internal surface to the external surface, or the adhesive comprises a second portion over the upper surface of the package support substrate and having a second thickness greater than the first thickness. Chen teaches a semiconductor die assembly (¶ 0028: 300) comprising an adhesive (¶ 0028: 302/304), the adhesive including a vent channel (¶ 0028: space 306) extending from an internal surface to an external surface (fig. 3: 306 extends from internal surface of 302/304 to an external surface of 302/304). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to configure the adhesive of Li with vent channels, as a means to vent outgas from an adhesive material (Chen, ¶ 0030). Li in view of Chen does not teach the adhesive comprises a second portion over the upper surface of the package support substrate and having a second thickness greater than the first thickness. Hong teaches a semiconductor die assembly (¶ 0043 & fig. 1: 1000) including a dies stack (200) on a semiconductor die (¶ 0043 & fig. 1: 200 disposed on semiconductor chip 110) and carried by a package support substrate (¶ 0044: 10), an adhesive (¶ 0070: 170 and 320) comprising a first portion over a lateral region of the semiconductor die and having a first thickness, and a second portion over the upper surface of the package support substrate and having a second thickness greater than the first thickness (fig. 1: 170/320 includes a first portion over lateral region of 110, and a second portion over an upper surface of 12, the second portion thicker than the first portion). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to configure the semiconductor die assembly of Li in view of Chen with the adhesive thickness of Hong, as a means to seal the side surfaces of the first semiconductor chip and a portion of the upper surface of the package support substrate (Hong, ¶ 0052), minimizing exposure the environmental effects and improving reliability of the package. Regarding claim 2, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 1 wherein the heat transfer structure includes a planar lower surface attached to the adhesive (Li, fig. 1: 113 comprises planar lower surface attached to 114b), and wherein the planar lower surface extends from the peripheral-most surface and the inner-most surface (Li, fig. 1: planar lower surface of 113 extends from external surface of 114b to inner-most surface of 114b). Regarding claim 3, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 1 wherein the die stack has a first longitudinal side and a second longitudinal side (Li, figs. 1, 4: 105 includes at least two longitudinal sides), and wherein the vent channel extends from the external surface of the adhesive to the internal surface adjacent the first longitudinal side (Chen, fig. 3: space 306 extends from external surface of 302/304 to internal surface of 302/304 adjacent side of 102, similar to 105 of Li). Regarding claim 4, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 3 wherein the inner-most surface of the heat transfer structure has a sidewall is spaced apart from the first longitudinal side and the second longitudinal side of the die stack by a gap (Li, fig. 1: inner-most surface of 113 has sidewall spaced apart from 1st and 2nd longitudinal sides of 105 by a gap). Regarding claim 5, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 1 further comprising a lid (Li, ¶ 0017: 112) carried by the heat transfer structure above the die stack (Li, fig. 1: 112 carried by 113 above 105). Regarding claim 6, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 1, wherein: the heat transfer structure is at least partially carried by the package support substrate (Li, fig. 1: 113 at last indirectly carried by 120). Regarding claim 7, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 6 wherein the package support substrate includes a lower surface having a plurality of electrical connectors (Li, ¶ 0015: bottom surface of 120/122 includes connectors 125), wherein the first semiconductor die is electrically coupled to the plurality of electrical connectors (Li, ¶ 0015: 102a electrically coupled to 120/122, including 124/125). Regarding claim 8, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 1 wherein an upper die of the die stack has a top surface area (Li, fig. 1: upper 103 of stack 105 has top surface), and wherein the heat transfer structure has an opening larger than the top surface area of the upper die (Li, fig. 1: 113 has larger opening than surface area of top 103). Regarding claim 22, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 1, wherein first semiconductor die has a sidewall, and wherein the external surface of the adhesive is spaced laterally apart from the sidewall peripheral to the first semiconductor die (Hong, fig. 1: external surface of 170/320 spaced laterally apart from the sidewall peripheral to 110). Regarding claim 23, Li in view of Chen and Hong teaches the semiconductor die assembly of claim 1, wherein the second portion of the adhesive is in contact with at least a portion of a sidewall of the first semiconductor die (Hong, fig. 1: second portion of 170/320 in contact with sidewall of 110). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 7, section A, filed 6/2/2026, with respect to the formal objection to claim 21 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Accordingly, the formal objection to claim 21 has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-8 and 22-23 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Vadhavkar et al. (PG Pub. No. US 20160013115 A1) teaches a die stack (122) arranged on a semiconductor die (110), and an adhesive (133/148) including portions over a lateral region of the semiconductor die and an upper surface of a package substrate (102), the first and second portions having different thicknesses (fig. 2C). Chandolu (PG Pub. No. US 2016/0268235 A1) teaches a die stack (102a) arranged on a semiconductor die (102b), and an adhesive (114b) over a lateral region of the semiconductor die (fig. 1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN TURNER whose telephone number is (571)270-5411. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at 571-270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN TURNER/Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Jul 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 28, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751271
GATE ALL AROUND BACKSIDE POWER RAIL WITH DIFFUSION BREAK
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745453
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DRIVER DEVICE, LAYOUT, AND METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12727226
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721105
INTEGRATED DICING DIE BONDING SHEET AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713784
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+4.4%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 769 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month