Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/602,574

METHOD FOR PRODUCING HIGH VALUE-ADDED COMPOUNDS FROM POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 08, 2021
Examiner
LEE, JOHN
Art Unit
1794
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ewha University - Industry Collaboration Foundation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
22%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
0%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 22% of cases
22%
Career Allow Rate
6 granted / 27 resolved
-42.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -22% lift
Without
With
+-22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
71
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 27 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 12/24/2025 has been entered into the prosecution of the application. Claim 1 is amended and claims 3-8 are canceled. Currently, claim(s) 1-2 is/are pending examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Milan Hajek of US 2010/0133088 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Hajek) from the Information Disclosure Statement received on 10/08/2021 in view of Noriyuki Nukui of US 2014/0120593 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Nukui) and Jiménez, et al. "Uncovering the Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 gallate decarboxylase involved in tannin degradation." Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79.14 (2013): 4253-4263) (hereinafter referred to as Jiménez) from the Information Disclosure Statement received on 10/08/2021, relying on Wang, Jia, et al. "Microbial synthesis of pyrogallol using genetically engineered Escherichia coli." Metabolic Engineering 45 (2018): 134-141, as an evidentiary support for claim 1. As to claim 1, Hajek teaches to a method of producing pyrogallol from polyethylene terephthalate, comprising: producing terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol through hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate (Hajek, paragraph [0006], teaches to producing terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol through hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate, as Hajek teaches to performing hydrolysis under continuing microwave radiation for yielding terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol). Hajek does not explicitly teach producing pyrogallol through bioconversion of the terephthalic acid in the presence of a biocatalyst, wherein protocatechuic acid is an intermediate produced by the bioconversion, and the bioconversion of terephthalic acid to protocatechuic acid is performed using a microbe expressing terephthalic acid 1,2-dioxygenase and 1,2-dihydroxy-3,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dicarboxylate dehydrogenase as biocatalysts. In an analogous art, Nukui teaches to producing pyrogallol through bioconversion of the terephthalic acid in the presence of a biocatalyst (Nukui, paragraph [0108], teaches to producing pyrogallol through bioconversion of the terephthalic acid in the presence of a biocatalyst, as Nukui discloses producing gallic acid through bioconversion of the terephthalic acid in the presence of a biocatalyst; Nukui, paragraph [0147], teaches to the biocatalyst is a microbe expressing terephthalate 1,2-dioxygenase), wherein protocatechuic acid is an intermediate produced by the bioconversion (Nukui, paragraph [0048], teaches to wherein protocatechuic acid is an intermediate produced by the bioconversion, as Nukui teaches to a method of using a microorganism for converting terephthalic acid into protocatechuic acid), and the bioconversion of terephthalic acid to protocatechuic acid is performed using a microbe expressing terephthalic acid 1,2-dioxygenase (Nukui, paragraph [0108], Fig. 1, teaches to using a microbe expressing terephthalic acid 1,2-dioxygenase, also expressed as TPADO) and 1,2-dihydroxy-3,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dicarboxylate dehydrogenase as biocatalysts (Nukui, paragraph [0108], Fig. 1, teaches to using 1,2-dihydroxy-3,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dicarbonxylate dehydrogenase, also expressed as TPA-DHD dehydrogenase, as biocatalysts). Both Hajek and Nukui relate to recycling the polyethylene terephthalate products (Nukui, paragraph [0004] – [0005]). Hajek does not explicitly teach producing pyrogallol through bioconversion of terephthalic acid in the presence of a biocatalyst. Hajek does teach to hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate using microwave radiation. Nukui teaches to producing pyrogallol through bioconversion of terephthalic acid in the presence of a biocatalyst for recycling of polyethylene terephthalate for obtaining other useful chemicals using microorganisms (Nukui, paragraph [0006]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the method of Hajek with the biocatalyst of Nukui for recycling of polyethylene terephthalate for obtaining other useful chemicals using microorganisms. Hajek in view of Nukui teaches to wherein the bioconversion of terephthalic acid to pyrogallol is performed using a combination of a microbe expressing terephthalic acid 1,2-dioxygenase (Nukui, paragraph [0108], Fig. 1, teaches to using a microbe expressing terephthalic acid 1,2-dioxygenase, also expressed as TPADO), 1,2-dihydroxy-3,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dicarbonylate dehydrogenase (Nukui, paragraph [0108], Fig. 1, teaches to using 1,2-dihydroxy-3,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dicarbonxylate dehydrogenase, also expressed as TPA-DHD dehydrogenase, as biocatalysts), and a microbe expressing a phenol hydroxylase as a biocatalyst (Nukui, paragraph [0108], Fig. 1, teaches to a microbe expressing a phenol hydroxylase as a biocatalyst, as Nukui teaches to p-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase). Hajek in view of Nukui does not explicitly teach protocatechuic acid decarboxylase. In an analogous art, Jiménez teaches to protocatechuic acid decarboxylase (Jiménez, pg. 4257-4258, teaches to protocatechuic acid decarboxylase, as Jiménez teaches to LpdC as gallate decarboxylase; LpdC is a non-oxidative aromatic acid decarboxylase that functions as a gallate decarboxylase and is operable as a protocatechuic acid decarboxylase). Both Hajek in view of Nukui and Jiménez relate to using engineered proteins for biosynthetic pathway (Jiménez, pg. 4257). Hajek in view of Nukui does not explicitly teach to a method of producing pyrogallol. Hajek in view of Nukui does teach producing gallic acid. Wang, abstract, relied on as an evidentiary support herein, teaches that decarboxylation of gallic acid was known to produce pyrogallol prior to the effective filing date of the instant invention. Jiménez teaches to using a microbe expressing protocatechuic acid decarboxylase for eliminating carboxyl group, thereby converting gallic acid into pyrogallol. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the method of Hajek in view of Nukui with the biocatalyst of Jiménez for obtaining other useful chemicals using microorganisms. As to claim 2, Hajek teaches to the method of claim 1, wherein the hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate is performed by applying microwaves (Hajek, paragraph [0006], teaches to wherein the hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate is performed by applying microwaves, as Hajek teaches to performing hydrolysis under continuing microwave radiation for yielding terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/24/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On pg. 4-6 of 7, the applicant addresses Fig. 8a and 8b, along with “PG-1a/1b system” and “PG-2a/2b system,” but does not clearly establish how the claims avoid the references or distinguish from them. Applicant should submit an argument under the heading “Remarks” pointing out disagreements with the examiner’s contentions. Applicant must also discuss the references applied against the claims, explaining how the claims avoid the references or distinguish from them. Applicant's arguments fail to comply with 37 CFR 1.111(b) because they amount to a general allegation that the claims define a patentable invention without specifically pointing out how the language of the claims patentably distinguishes them from the references. Please refer to the rejection above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN LEE whose telephone number is (703)756-1254. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 7:00-16:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Lin can be reached at (571) 272-8902. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN LEE/Examiner, Art Unit 1794 /JAMES LIN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 08, 2021
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 08, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 24, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12485409
Improved Methods and Systems for Photo-Activated Hydrogen Generation
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12415218
Continuous Methods for Treating Liquids and Manufacturing Certain Constituents (e.g., Nanoparticles) in Liquids, Apparatuses and Nanoparticles and Nanoparticle/Liquid Solution(s) Resulting Therefrom
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 16, 2025
Patent 12409410
REFRIGERATOR TO REDUCE THE DETERIORATION RATE OF STORED ITEMS USING PLASMA AND PHOTOCATALYST
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 09, 2025
Patent 12281013
MICROWAVE REACTOR SYSTEM ENCLOSING A SELF-IGNITING PLASMA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 22, 2025
Patent 12128163
AIR TREATMENT APPARATUS FOR A DOMESTIC APPLIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 29, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
22%
Grant Probability
0%
With Interview (-22.2%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 27 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month