Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/607,465

TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING AN INDICATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 29, 2021
Priority
Apr 30, 2019 — CN PCT/CN2019/085244 +1 more
Examiner
ACOLATSE, KODZOVI
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
774 granted / 926 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
977
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
85.4%
+45.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 926 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/30/2025 has been entered Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 20, 22, 40, 42, 44 and 46 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the amendment filed 07/25/2025 have been considered but are not persuasive. See rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 5, 8 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sun et al (US 2018/0014298 A1) in view of Mukherjee et al (US 2020/0267752 A1). Regarding claim 1, Sun teaches a method in a wireless communication device (WCD), the method comprising: the WCD receiving from a base station serving the WCD information indicating a plurality of transmission resources for a first channel between the WCD and the serving base station that have been allocated to the WCD, wherein the plurality of transmission resources allocated to the WCD comprises a first transmission occasions allocated to the WCD and one or more second transmission occasions allocated to the WCD (Sun: Fig. 4B; [0109]-[0110], UE receives multi-TTI grant from the bae station; the multi-TTI grant comprising TTI3 to TTI10 (8 TTIs/slots)/first slot and TTI0 to TTI2/second slot). Sun does not explicitly disclose prior to the occurrence of the one or more second transmission occasions, the WCD transmitting to the network node an indication indicating that the WCD will not use at least one of the one or more second transmission occasions allocated to the WCD to transmit any information on the first channel, wherein the indication indicates at least one index corresponding to at least one of the one or more second transmission occasions. Mukherjee teaches prior to the occurrence of the one or more second transmission occasions, the WCD transmitting to the network node an indication indicating that the WCD will not use at least one of the one or more second transmission occasions allocated to the WCD to transmit any information on the first channel, wherein the indication indicates at least one index corresponding to at least one of the one or more second transmission occasions (Mukherjee: Fig. 13; [0085]-[0087], UE transmits NULL BSR indication 1339; [0046]-[0047], [0066], the null BSR indicates the at least one or more slots that the UE will not use). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Sun wherein prior to the occurrence of the one or more second transmission occasions, the WCD transmitting to the network node an indication indicating that the WCD will not use at least one of the one or more second transmission occasions allocated to the WCD to transmit any information on the first channel, wherein the indication indicates at least one index corresponding to at least one of the one or more second transmission occasions as disclosed by Mukherjee to provide a system for efficient scheduling of uplink resources (Mukherjee: Abstract). Regarding claim 5, Sun in view of Mukherjee teaches wherein transmitting the indication comprises transmitting the indication on a second channel different to than the first channel (Mukherjee: Fig. 13; [0040], [0085], the NULL BSR indication on a licensed carrier that is different from the unlicensed carrier). Regarding claim 8, Sun in view of Mukherjee teaches wherein the method further comprises the WCD determining, based on a buffer status, an amount of information to be transmitted in a transmission occasion, a number of earlier Listen Before Talk (LBT) failures, and/or a channel occupancy of the first channel, that the second transmission resource allocated to the WCD can be allocated to another WCD (Mukherjee: Fig. 13; [0040], [0085]). Regarding claim 14, Sun teaches wherein the transmission resources comprise transmission resources of a PUSCH transmission (Sun: [0112]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KODZOVI ACOLATSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1999. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 10 am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Avellino Joseph can be reached at (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KODZOVI ACOLATSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 10 earlier events
Apr 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 25, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 06, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641587
SIGNALING FOR POWER CLASS FALLBACK WITH TRANSMISSION DIVERSITY
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641664
TECHNIQUES FOR RADIO RESOURCE CONTROL RECONFIGURATION ALIGNMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634788
ELECTRONIC DEVICE CAPABLE OF CONTROLLING FREQUENCY BANDS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634673
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR MANAGING CONTROLLED DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628226
Methods for Adaptive User Equipment Behavior for Cell Reconfiguration in NR-U
4y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.5%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 926 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month