Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/652,016

LIGHT EMITTING DIODE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 22, 2022
Examiner
GARRETT, DAWN L
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
689 granted / 952 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
74 currently pending
Career history
1026
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 952 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on February 4, 2026 has been entered. The claim amendment dated January 2, 2026 has now been entered. Claim 1 was amended. Claims 1-20 are present. Claims 15-20 are withdrawn as non-elected. Claims 1-14 are under consideration. Previously, applicant elected species A comprising a Formula 1 compound and a Formula E-1 compound without traverse and species of Formula 1 identified as Ar having formula 2-1 and X1 and X2 as NR3. The objection to claim 14 set forth in the last office action is withdrawn with respect to the current claim listing showing clearly printed structures. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fleetham et al. (US 2021/0066616 A1). Fleetham et al. teaches Formula I compounds for an OLED device (see abstract): PNG media_image1.png 172 202 media_image1.png Greyscale . More specifically, the formula may be the following (see bottom of page 5, par. 69): PNG media_image2.png 148 168 media_image2.png Greyscale . Y1 and Y2 may be selected as NR (see par. 60) and X3 to X5 (see par. 52) and X9 to X14 may be C (see par. 69). The defined formula meets the requirements of instant Formula 1 of claim 1, instant Formula 2-1 of claim 8, Formula 3-1 or 3-2 of claim 10, and Formula 4-1 or 4-2 of claim 12. With respect to instant Ar of claim 6, a nitrogen-containing group of the above page 5 formula is an aromatic heterocycle and the ring is pentagonal with respect to instant claim 7. Regarding claim 2, compounds of the above formula(s) are used in the emissive region (see abstract and par. 90-93). Regarding claim 3, the compound may be a dopant of the region (see abstract and par. 90-91). Regarding claim 4, a device may be formed with layers emitting blue light (see par. 5). Regarding claim 5, an organic layer may include a delayed fluorescence emitter (see par. 88). Regarding claims 9 and 11, each of RA, RB, and RC in the above formula may be hydrogen (see par. 53). Regarding claim 13, Y1 and Y2 may be selected as NR (see par. 60). Regarding claim 14, when Y1 and Y2 are selected as NR with R as aryl phenyl, a compound of the above formula is the same as at least compound #5 of claim 14 (see par. 52, 38): PNG media_image3.png 96 120 media_image3.png Greyscale . With further respect to instant claim 1 and anthracene-based instant formula E-1, Fleetham et al. teaches host material may be an anthracene and phenyl containing compound (see par. 133-135) and also further teaches at least the following specific diphenyl anthracene compound for an ETL (electron-transporting) layer (see par. 144, page 89): PNG media_image4.png 148 272 media_image4.png Greyscale . Additionally note that a specific dinaphthyl-anthracene is taught by Fleetham at the top of page 37, par. 86, and in instant E-1, R39 and R40 may combine to form a ring. Note that instant subscripts p and q of instant formula E-1 may be an integer 0. Accordingly, the recited “at least one selected from R39 and R40 is deuterium” is met by the above discussed compounds as deuterium is not present when instant p and q are zero. While Fleetham et al. does not appear to exemplify a device where an anthracene compound and a boron compound of the above formula were both selected in an example device embodiment, given the teachings of the reference, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have selected defined materials of the reference as described above wherein the resultant compounds and layered device would also meet the limitations of the instant claims. One would expect to achieve an operational device within the disclosure of Fleetham et al. with a predictable result and a reasonable expectation of success. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fleetham et al. (US 2021/0066616 A1) in view of Joo et al. (US 2020/0172558 A1). Fleetham et al. teaches Formula I compounds for an OLED device (see abstract): PNG media_image1.png 172 202 media_image1.png Greyscale . More specifically, the formula may be the following (see bottom of page 5, par. 69): PNG media_image2.png 148 168 media_image2.png Greyscale . Y1 and Y2 may be selected as NR (see par. 60) and X3 to X5 (see par. 52) and X9 to X14 may be C (see par. 69). The defined formula meets the requirements of instant Formula 1 of claim 1, instant Formula 2-1 of claim 8, Formula 3-1 or 3-2 of claim 10, and Formula 4-1 or 4-2 of claim 12. With respect to instant Ar of claim 6, a nitrogen-containing group of the above page 5 formula is an aromatic heterocycle and the ring is pentagonal with respect to instant claim 7. Regarding claim 2, compounds of the above formula(s) are used in the emissive region (see abstract and par. 90-93). Regarding claim 3, the compound may be a dopant of the region (see abstract and par. 90-91). Regarding claim 4, a device may be formed with layers emitting blue light (see par. 5). Regarding claim 5, an organic layer may include a delayed fluorescence emitter (see par. 88). Regarding claims 9 and 11, each of RA, RB, and RC in the above formula may be hydrogen (see par. 53). Regarding claim 13, Y1 and Y2 may be selected as NR (see par. 60). Regarding claim 14, when Y1 and Y2 are selected as NR with R as aryl phenyl, a compound of the above formula is the same as at least compound #5 of claim 14 (see par. 52, 38): PNG media_image3.png 96 120 media_image3.png Greyscale . With further respect to instant claim 1 and anthracene-based instant formula E-1, Fleetham et al. teaches host material may be an anthracene and phenyl containing compound (see par. 133-134); however, Fleetham et al. is silent with respect to example anthracene derivatives as host including at least one deuterium per instant claim 1 when instant formula E-1 subscripts p or q are 1 to 5. In analogous art, Joo et al. teaches anthracene derivatives as host material according to formula C to use with polycyclic aromatic compounds containing boron and nitrogen as dopant (see Joo par. 45): PNG media_image5.png 186 248 media_image5.png Greyscale . The Ar9 group may be phenylene C-1 where the R31 to R35 include deuterium (see Joo par. 47, 12): PNG media_image6.png 110 216 media_image6.png Greyscale . In Joo et al. Formula C, L13 may be single bond or arylene and Ar10 may be hydrogen, deuterium, or aryl among other groups (see Joo par. 46). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have selected an anthracene host material taught by Joo et al. as described above as anthracene derivative host material for a device according to Fleetham. One would expect the Joo et al. host material to be similarly useful for the function of host material for a light emitting layer in a Fleetham device. One would expect to achieve an operational device having materials within the disclosures of Fleetham et al. and Joo et al. with a predictable result and a reasonable expectation of success. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed January 2, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As noted in the above rejection over Fleetham et al. alone that has been maintained, the instant claims continue to provide for p and q as zero in E-1. Accordingly, deuterium on the anthracene derivative is not required to be present. When p or q are more than zero, this provision has been addressed by the above obviousness rejection over Fleetham in view of Joo. An anthracene derivative including a deuterium is known in the art and is at least present in the Joo et al. reference cited in the rejection. The example devices in the instant specification use anthracene compound E-17 specifically as host material of a light emitting layer. The broader claims are not commensurate in scope with E-17 of the examples. Further, the instant claims do not even require that the anthracene derivative is specifically a host material in a light emitting layer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Dawn Garrett whose telephone number is (571)272-1523. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday (Eastern Time). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAWN L GARRETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 26, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 02, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595256
COMPOSITION FOR ORGANIC ELECTRONIC DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598910
COMPOUND AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583864
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581847
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12563960
Organic Compound, Light-Emitting Device, Light-Emitting Apparatus, Electronic Device, and Lighting Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+10.0%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 952 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month