Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/656,373

Method of Manufacturing Component Carriers With Removable Plate in Core

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Mar 24, 2022
Examiner
WINTERS, SEAN AYERS
Art Unit
2892
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
At&S (Chongqing) Company Limited
OA Round
4 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
97 granted / 112 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
80 currently pending
Career history
192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
58.8%
+18.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 112 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendments 2. The Amendments filed February 2nd, 2026 are noted in response to the Non-Final Office Action mailed 10/31/2025 are noted. Applicant’s amendments to the claims are noted. 3. Claims 15-20 are now canceled; Claim 21 is newly-added; Claims 1-14 and 21 remain pending in the application. 4. Claims 1-14 and 21 have been fully considered in examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 11-14, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choi (U.S. PG Pub No US2016/0105967A1) (of record). Regarding claim 1, Choi teaches a method of manufacturing a component carrier [see title, 0042], the method comprising: providing a core (310 with upper 121) fig. 6 [0060], the core (310 with upper 121) having at least one through hole (upper 125 through upper 121) fig. 7 [0059]; then arranging at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140) fig. 8 [0062] in the at least one through hole (125); thereafter forming a stack (comprising lower 150-151 stacked with lower 122 with lower 126) figs. 9-10 [0063-0065, 0069] (lower 150-151 formed in fig. 9, lower 122 and lower 126 formed in fig. 10 – after upper 140 formed in fig. 8) on (supported by bottom of) the at least one carrier plate (upper 140), wherein the stack (lower 150-151 with lower 122 with lower 126) comprises at least one electrically conductive layer structure (lower 126; formed of conductive metal [0069]) and at least one electrically insulating layer structure (lower 122; formed of insulating material [0068]); thereafter entirely removing [see fig. 11, 0070-0071] the at least one carrier plate (upper 140) from the stack (comprising lower 150-151 with lower 122 with lower 126) (upper 140 entirely separated [0070-0071] from lower stack comprising lower 150-151, lower 122, and lower 126). Regarding claim 2, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. Choi also teaches wherein a plurality of carrier plates (at least 4 110’s) fig. 10 [0025, 0055] are embedded in the core (310 with upper 121) fig. 6 [0060]. Regarding claim 3, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 2. Choi also teaches wherein two carrier plates (left, right 110) fig. 10 [0025, 0055] of the plurality of carrier plates (at least 4 110s) are separated (laterally) by a portion of the core (comprising upper 121) fig. 10 [0060]. Regarding claim 4, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. Choi also teaches wherein the at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140) fig. 8 [0062] is attached to the core (comprising 121) fig. 10 [0060] (at least in part) by an adhesive (lower 140 material) fig. 9 [0062]. Regarding claim 5, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. Choi also teaches wherein the core (310 with 121) fig. 6 [0060] and the at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140 and 110s) fig. 8 [0055, 0062] form part of a panel (solid panel shown in fig. 10), by means of which a plurality of component carriers (supporting devices 150s as shown in fig. 10 onwards) can be manufactured. Regarding claim 6, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. Choi also teaches wherein the at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140 and 110s) fig. 8 [0055, 0062] comprises a seed layer (formed from 310 base), which is configured to (structurally) facilitate the formation of the stack (comprising lower 150-151 stacked with lower 122 with lower 126) figs. 9-10 [0063-0065, 0069] on (supported by) the (bottom of) at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 110, 140) (by facilitating formation of lower 150/151, lower 122, lower 126 bulk material [0065-0069]). Regarding claim 11, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. Choi also teaches wherein the method comprises surface mounting a component (upper 150) fig. 10 [0061-0065] on the (supported by top of) stack (comprising lower 150-151 stacked with lower 122 with lower 126) figs. 9-10 [0063-0065, 0069] before removing [see fig. 11, 0069-0070] the at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140) fig. 11 [0055, 0062]. Regarding claim 12, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 11. Choi also teaches wherein the method comprises overmolding (with upper 122 material) fig. 10 [0066-0067] the component (upper 150) fig. 10 [0061-0063] (in excess encapsulant 122) before removing the at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140) fig. 11 [0055, 0062] [see fig. 11, 0070-0071]. Regarding claim 13, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. Choi also teaches wherein the method comprises exposing part [see fig. 12, 0068] of an electrically conductive layer (upper 126) fig. 10 [0069] on the at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140 and 110s) fig. 8 [0055, 0062] by patterning an electrically insulating layer (upper 122) fig. 12 [0068] on the (bottom of) electrically conductive layer (126 in fig. 11). Regarding claim 14, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 13. Choi also teaches wherein the method comprises applying electrically conductive material (137 via fill [0080]) fig. 14 [0080] selectively on the exposed part of the electrically conductive layer (etched sidewalls of upper 126). Regarding claim 21, Choi teaches a method of manufacturing a component carrier [see title, 0042], the method comprising: providing a core (upper 121) fig. 6 [0060], the core (upper 121) having at least one through hole (upper 125 through upper 121) fig. 7 [0059] entirely (vertically) through the core (upper 121); then arranging at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140) fig. 8 [0062] in the at least one through hole (upper 125); thereafter forming a stack (comprising lower 150-151 stacked with lower 122 with lower 126) figs. 9-10 [0063-0065, 0069] (lower 150-151 formed in fig. 9, lower 122 and lower 126 formed in fig. 10 – after upper 140 formed in fig. 8) on (supported by bottom of) the at least one carrier plate (upper 140), wherein the stack (lower 150-151 with lower 122 with lower 126) comprises at least one electrically conductive layer structure (lower 126; formed of conductive metal [0069]) and at least one electrically insulating layer structure (lower 122; formed of insulating material [0068]); thereafter removing [see fig. 11, 0070-0071] the at least one carrier plate (upper 140) from the stack (comprising lower 150-151 with lower 122 with lower 126) (upper 140 entirely separated [0070-0071] from lower stack comprising lower 150-151, lower 122, and lower 126). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Choi (U.S. PG Pub No US2016/0105967A1) (of record), as applied in claim 1 above, in view of Fang (U.S. PG Pub No US2018/0061805A1) (of record). Regarding claim 7, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. However, Choi does not explicitly disclose wherein the stack (comprising lower 150-151 stacked with lower 122 with lower 126) figs. 9-10 [0063-0065, 0069] is configured as a redistribution layer for a component mounted to the stack (comprising lower 150-151 stacked with lower 122 with lower 126) fig. 10 [0063-0065, 0069]. Fang teaches a method [see title, abstract, 0002] wherein the stack (14 with 22) fig. 15 [0061, 0072] is configured as a redistribution layer [0072] for a component (12) fig. 15 [0061] mounted to the stack (14 with 22). Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the method of Choi with the teachings of Fang such that the stack is configured to support a redistribution layer in order to facilitate well-controlled electrical connections with adjacent conductive structures [0003, 0046], as taught by Fang. Regarding claim 8, Choi in view of Fang teaches the method [see title, abstract, 0002] of claim 7. Choi in view of Fang (with reference to Fang) also teaches wherein the redistribution layer (comprising conductive material of 14 with 22 stack) fig. 15 [0061, 0072] enlarges the footprint (expands footprint over interconnect structure) of the component (12). Regarding claim 9, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. However, Choi does not explicitly disclose wherein the at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140) fig. 8 [0062] comprises a plastic plate. Fang teaches a method [see title, abstract, 0002] wherein the at least one carrier plate (62) fig. 9 [0058] comprises a plastic plate [0059]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the method of Choi with the teachings of Fang such that the carrier plate includes a plastic plate [0059] in order to facilitate strong surface bonding with components supported thereon [0059], as taught by Fang. Regarding claim 10, Choi teaches the method [see title, 0042] of claim 1. However, Choi does not explicitly disclose wherein the at least one carrier plate (comprising upper 140) fig. 8 [0062] has a surface roughness Ra of not more than 450 nm (roughness not specified). Fang teaches a method [see title, abstract, 0002] wherein the at least one carrier plate (62) fig. 9 [0058] has a surface roughness Ra of not more than 450 nm (roughness of 64 [0075], which conforms to surface of 62 [0058-0060], may be about 0.01 micron = 10 nm [0075] < 450 nm). Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the method of Choi with the teachings of Fang such that the carrier plate is provided with a surface roughness [0055, 0075] on the order of tens of nanometers in order to improve surface adhesion between adjacent layers of the stacked configuration [0055], as taught by Fang. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/02/2026 have been fully considered but they are rendered largely moot by a reinterpretation of the claimed “stack” to correspond to “lower 150-151 stacked with lower 122 with lower 126” fig. 10 [0063-0065, 0069], which are formed in figs. 9-10, after upper 140 is formed in fig. 8, and are “on” carrier plate the at least one carrier plate (upper 140) in the sense that they are “supported by” the bottom surface of 140 in the composite structure of fig. 10. It is noted that this reinterpreted stack explicitly comprises an insulating layer (lower 122) fig. 10 [0066] and a conductive metal layer (lower 126) fig. 10 [0069] – and the carrier plate (upper 140) and stack (lower 150-151 with lower 122 with 126) are entirely removed/ separated from each other in the “removal” step shown in fig. 11 [0070-0071] of Choi. Further, with respect to Applicant’s argument of newly-added claim 21 that “cavity 125 only penetrates through the first insulating layer 121” – the “core” of claim 21 has been considered as only (upper 121) fig. 6 [0060 Choi] for the purposes of the rejection of claim 21. Therefore, the claimed invention of claim 1 and claim 21 are held unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 102 in view of Choi (U.S. PG Pub No US2016/0105967A1) (of record). In order to definitively overcome these interpretations, Applicant would need to place additional limitations on the claimed “carrier plate”, “stack”, and/or “core layer” of claims 1 and 21. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Remaining references made available on the PTO-892 form (of record) are considered relevant to the present disclosure because they all feature plates embedded in and removed from core material. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN AYERS WINTERS whose telephone number is (571)270-3308. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10:30 am - 7:00 pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, N. Drew Richards can be reached at (571) 272-1736. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN AYERS WINTERS/Examiner, Art Unit 2892 03/09/2026 /NORMAN D RICHARDS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2892
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 12, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 18, 2025
Interview Requested
Sep 24, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 24, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 01, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 02, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604591
SPACER LED ARCHITECTURE FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY MICRO LED DISPLAYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598972
Methods Used In Forming A Memory Array Comprising Strings Of Memory Cells Including Insulator Walls in a Through-Array-Via Region
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593680
INTEGRATED ASSEMBLIES HAVING LINERS OR RINGS SURROUNDING REGIONS OF CONDUCTIVE POSTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588247
Spacer Structures for Nano-Sheet-Based Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588434
METHODS FOR FORMING DIELECTRIC MATERIALS WITH SELECTED POLARIZATION FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.7%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 112 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month