Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/682,804

POWER GATE WITH METAL ON BOTH SIDES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 28, 2022
Priority
Sep 25, 2015 — nonprovisional of PCTUS2015052375 +1 more
Examiner
SALERNO, SARAH KATE
Art Unit
2814
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
637 granted / 869 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
901
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
84.5%
+44.5% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 869 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/21/25 has been entered. Applicant's amendment/arguments filed on 11/21/25 as being acknowledged and entered. By this amendment claims 3 and 6 are canceled and claims 1-2, 4-5, and 7-19 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1-2, 4, and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Or-Bach et al. (US Patent 8,803,206). Claim 1: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) a method comprising: providing a supply (Col. 125-126) from a package substrate to power gate transistors (5376, 5351) in a device layer (5322) of a circuit structure, the power gate transistors coupled to circuitry (5335, 5383, 5381 etc.) operable to receive a gated supply from the power gate transistors, the circuity on a first side of the device layer (Col. 126), the first side opposite the package substrate, and the circuitry coupled directly to the carrier substrate (5395), the carrier substrate on a side of the circuitry opposite the device layer; wherein each of the power gate transistors comprises a three-dimensional channel body, and a gate electrode over a top and along sidewalls of the three-dimensional channel body, the gate electrode electrically coupled to an interconnect of the circuitry (Col. 36) by a conductive contact, the conductive contact directly between the gate electrode and the interconnect (Fig 26F, 29B, 29D (42B-C, 43A-B); and distributing the gated supply from the power gate transistors to the circuitry using a grid (5330) on a second side of the device layer, the second side opposite the first side, wherein the grid, the device layer, the circuitry and the carrier substrate are included in the same die. Or-Bach teaches the transistors in figure 53 can be finfets which reads on the gate electrode structure claimed. Or-Bach teaches in several instances, an interconnect directly connected to the gate electrode via a conductive contact. Additionally this is common in the art to connect the gate electrode to a variety of other circuitry within a chip or to an outside component. Claim 2: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) providing a supply to power gate transistors comprises coupling to the transistors from the second of the device layer. Claim 4: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) distributing the gated supply from the power gate transistors comprises coupling the transistors to the grid from the underside of the transistors. Claim 5: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) controlling the gated supply from a control line coupled to the transistors on the first side. Claim(s) 7-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bose et al (US PGPub 2014/0148961) in view of Or-Bach et al. (US Patent 8,803,206). Claim 7: Bose teaches [0010, 0026-0027] (Fig. 4) a method of fabricating an apparatus, the method comprising: forming a circuit structure comprising a device stratum comprising a plurality of transistor devices, the device stratum (402) having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, the circuit structure comprising circuitry on the first side of the device stratum; and forming a gated supply grid (428/430) on the second side of the device stratum, wherein a drain of the at least one of the plurality of transistor devices is coupled to the gated supply grid, wherein the drain of the at least one of the plurality of transistor devices is coupled to the gated supply grid through a contact, the contact (412) on the second side of the device stratum and extending between the gated supply grid and the second side of the device stratum but not into the device stratum; and coupling the circuit structure to a package substrate, the circuity of the circuit structure on a side of the plurality of transistors opposite the package substrate. Bose does not teach wherein each of the plurality transistors comprises a three-dimensional channel body, and a gate electrode over a top and along sidewalls of the three-dimensional channel body the gate electrode electrically coupled to an interconnect of the circuitry (Col. 36) by a conductive contact, the conductive contact directly between the gate electrode and the interconnect, or describe the circuitry directly coupled to a carrier substrate, the carrier substrate on a sides of the circuitry opposite the device stratum; the gated supply grid, the device stratum, the circuitry, and the carrier substrate are included on the same die. Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53, Cols. 36, 125-126) each of the plurality transistors comprises a three-dimensional channel body, and a gate electrode over a top and along sidewalls of the three-dimensional channel body, the gate electrode electrically coupled to an interconnect of the circuitry (Col. 36) by a conductive contact, the conductive contact directly between the gate electrode and the interconnect (Fig 26F, 29B, 29D (42B-C, 43A-B); and describes the circuitry directly coupled to a carrier substrate, the carrier substrate on a sides of the circuitry opposite the device stratum; the gated supply grid, the device stratum, the circuitry, and the carrier substrate are included on the same die as described in claim 1 to increase package efficiency (Col. 1-2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the device taught by Bose to have specified the circuitry directly coupled to a carrier substrate, the carrier substrate on a sides of the circuitry opposite the device stratum; the gated supply grid, the device stratum, the circuitry, and the carrier substrate are included on the same die to increase package efficiency (Col. 1-2) as taught by Or-Bach. Or-Bach teaches the transistors in figure 53 can be finfets which reads on the gate electrode structure claimed. Or-Bach teaches in several instances, an interconnect directly connected to the gate electrode via a conductive contact. Additionally this is common in the art to connect the gate electrode to a variety of other circuitry within a chip or to an outside component. Claim 8: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) forming a supply grid on the second side of the device stratum, wherein a source of at least one of the plurality of transistor devices is coupled to the supply grid. The claim doesn’t require direct coupling so if the transistor is coupled to the grid, so is the source. Claim 9: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126) a control line on a first side of the device stratum, wherein the gate electrode of the at least one of the plurality of transistor devices is coupled to the control line. The claim doesn’t require direct coupling therefore the reference teaching control circuitry connecting to the device stratum reads on coupling. Claim 10: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126) the gate electrode of the at least one of the plurality of transistor devices is coupled to the control line through a gate contact projecting between the device and the control line and the drain of the device is coupled to the gated supply grid through a junction contact projecting between the device and the gated supply grid. The claim does not require the contact to be in physical or electrical contact so it could be any contact in the system since it could be coupled by being in the same overall IC package. Claim 11: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126) forming a contact point operable to couple the circuit structure to an external power source, the contact point coupled to the supply grid on the second side of the device stratum. Claim 12: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126) the gated supply grid comprises a power grid, the method further comprising forming a ground grid on the second side of the device stratum. Claim 13: Or-Bach teaches the transistor devices comprises a non-planar transistor device comprising a fin and the gate electrode is disposed on the channel region of the fin to lower the contact resistance (Col. 28). The use of FinFets is well known in the art. Claim 14: Bose teaches [0010, 0026-0027] (Fig. 4) a method of fabricating a system, the method comprising: providing a supply connection (412); and coupling a die (400) to the supply connection, the die comprising: (i) core logic circuitry (408) to receive one or more gated supplies, and (ii) a plurality of transistors (418) defining a device layer and coupled between the supply connection and the core logic circuitry to controllably provide the one or more gated supplies to the core logic circuitry, the core logic circuitry on a first side of the device layer, the first layer opposite the package substrate, each of the plurality of transistors comprising a gate electrode, wherein the gated supplies to the circuitry is routed (442) on a second side of the device layer, the second side opposite the first side, wherein a drain of at least one of the plurality of transistors is coupled to the gated supplies through a contact, the contact on the second side of the device stratum and extending between the gated supplies and the second side of the device layer but not into the device layer. Bose does not teach the plurality of transistors having a three-dimensional channel body, and a gate electrode over a top and along sidewalls of the three-dimensional channel body, the gate electrode electrically coupled to an interconnect of the core logic circuity by a conductive contact, the conductive contact directly between the gate electrode and the interconnect or describe the core logic circuitry coupled directly to a carrier substrate, the carrier substrate on a side of the core logic circuitry opposite the device layer. Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126) plurality of transistors having a three-dimensional channel body, and a gate electrode over a top and along sidewalls of the three-dimensional channel body, the gate electrode electrically coupled to an interconnect the core logic circuity (Col. 36) by a conductive contact, the conductive contact directly between the gate electrode and the interconnect (Fig 26F, 29B, 29D (42B-C, 43A-B), the core logic circuitry coupled directly to a carrier substrate, the carrier substrate on a side of the core logic circuitry opposite the device layer to increase package efficiency (Col. 1-2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the device taught by Bose to have specified the core logic circuitry coupled directly to a carrier substrate, the carrier substrate on a side of the core logic circuitry opposite the device layer to increase package efficiency (Col. 1-2) as taught by Or-Bach. Or-Bach teaches the transistors in figure 53 can be finfets which reads on the gate electrode structure claimed. Or-Bach teaches in several instances, an interconnect directly connected to the gate electrode via a conductive contact. Additionally this is common in the art to connect the gate electrode to a variety of other circuitry within a chip or to an outside component. Claim 15: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126the one or more gated supplies are coupled to the plurality of transistors from the underside of the device layer. Claim 16: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126a supply connection to the power gate transistors comprises a grid on the underside of the device layer. Claim 17: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126distributing the gated supply from the power gate transistors comprises coupling the transistors to the grid from the underside of the device layer. Claim 18: Or-Bach teaches (Fig. 53) (Col. 125-126controlling the gated supply from a control line coupled to the plurality of transistors on the first side of the device layer. Claim19: Or-Bach teaches the transistor devices comprises a non-planar transistor device comprising a fin and the gate electrode is disposed on the channel region of the fin to lower the contact resistance (col. 28). The use of FinFets is well known in the art. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-2, 3-5, and 7-19 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARAH KATE SALERNO whose telephone number is (571)270-1266. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30am-2:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wael Fahmy can be reached on 5712721705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARAH K SALERNO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2814
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 13 earlier events
Jan 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 01, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Oct 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 21, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635190
FinFET Device and Method of Forming Same
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628367
VERTICAL TRANSISTORS HAVING IMPROVED CONTROL OF PARASITIC CAPACITANCE AND GATE-TO-CONTACT SHORT CIRCUITS
4y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628476
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS USING SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622092
PHOTODETECTOR
4y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12622310
WAFER LEVEL FAN OUT SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 869 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month