Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/708,470

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 30, 2022
Priority
Jul 09, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0090138
Examiner
PATEL, REEMA
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
996 granted / 1122 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1156
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1122 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/28/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 20-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 20 recites the limitation “the pad pattern has a second thickness between an upper surface and the lower surface of the pad pattern in the direction” in lines 21-22. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation of “the direction” in the claim. For the purposes of examination, the examiner interprets “the direction” in line 22 as - - a direction perpendicular to a lower surface to the first semiconductor chip - -. However, appropriate correction and/or clarification is requested. Claims 21 and 23 inherit the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, rejections based on their dependencies on claim 20. Claim 20 recites the limitation “the metal layer has a third thickness, which is smaller than the second thickness between an upper surface and a lower surface of the metal layer in the direction” in lines 23-24. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation of “the direction” in the claim. For the purposes of examination, the examiner interprets “the direction” in line 24 as - - a direction perpendicular to a lower surface to the first semiconductor chip - -. However, appropriate correction and/or clarification is requested. Claims 21 and 23 inherit the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, rejections based on their dependencies on claim 20. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-8 and 11-14 are allowed. Claim 1 contains allowable subject matter because of the limitation the pad pattern has a second thickness between an upper surface and a lower surface of the pad pattern in the direction, the metal layer has a third thickness between an upper surface and a lower surface of the metal layer in the direction, and the pad thickness is a sum of the second thickness and the third thickness, and wherein a width of the opening is smaller than a width of the pad pattern, a width of the metal layer is smaller than the width of the pad pattern, and the metal layer is in contact with a sidewall of the passivation layer defining the opening in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claims 3-8 depend on claim 1. Claim 11 contains allowable subject matter because of the limitation one of the interconnection patterns comprises a side surface facing a side surface of the pad structure, wherein the one of the interconnection patterns has a first thickness between an upper surface and a lower surface thereof in the direction, wherein the pad thickness is greater than the first thickness, wherein the pad pattern has a second thickness between an upper surface and the lower surface of the pad pattern in the direction, wherein the metal layer has a third thickness, which is smaller than the second thickness between an upper surface and a lower surface of the metal layer in the direction, and wherein the pad thickness is a sum of the second thickness and the third thickness in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claims 12-14 depend on claim 11. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 20-21 and 23 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Examiner notes that withdrawn claim 18 depends on cancelled claim 15. Even assuming claim 18 depended on claim 11 as argued by Applicant (pp 11) in the Remarks, Examiner notes that the subject matter of claim 18 (“the third thickness of the metal layer is greater than the second thickness of the pad pattern”) directly conflicts with the subject matter of claim 11 (“the metal layer has a third thickness, which is smaller than the second thickness…”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REEMA PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-1436. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Kim can be reached at (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REEMA PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 4/15/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jul 10, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 09, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 27, 2025
Interview Requested
Feb 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677516
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING SELF-ALIGNED LEDS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677443
SELF-ALIGNED SUBSTRATE ISOLATION (SASI) OF GATE-ALL-AROUND NANOSHEET FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672522
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF TESTING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672452
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666716
CMOS STRUCTURE, AND FABRICATION METHODS OF FINFET CMOS, FD CMOS AND GAA CMOS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1122 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month