Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/727,259

STERILIZED WATER GENERATOR, WATER PURIFIER AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 22, 2022
Priority
Apr 09, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0046670 +1 more
Examiner
RUFO, LOUIS J
Art Unit
1795
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
386 granted / 710 resolved
-10.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
80.7%
+40.7% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11 May 2026 has been entered. Status of Amendment The amendment filed on 11 March 2026 fails to place the application in condition for allowance. Claims 1-3, 7, 8, and 12-15 are currently pending and under examination. Status of Rejections Previous rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) are herein withdrawn due to Applicant’s amendment field 6 August 2025. All previous rejections are herein maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kwon et al (US 2013/0277222 A1). As to claims 1 and 8, Kwon discloses a sterilized water generator (“water treatment apparatus” Title. Figs. 2-4) comprising: a water inlet pipe through which water flows to the sterilized water generator (#150 water supply pipe); a water outlet pipe through which sterilized water flows from the sterilized water generator (#170 purified water pipe ); a plurality of electrolysis modules arranged in parallel to each other, along a flow path, between the water inlet pipe and the water outlet pipe, the plurality of electrolysis modules configured to electrolyze the water flowing through the water inlet pipe to produce the sterilized water (#s 121/122 “first electrochemical filter” “Second electrochemical filter” [0099]); and a controller (#130) configured to while the water flowing through the water inlet pipe flows through the plurality of electrolysis modules to the water outlet pipe ([0101], [0087] “he control unit 130 may control the first electrochemical filter 121 to perform the water purifying operation when the second electrochemical filter 121 needs to be recycled.” control a forward voltage not to be applied to a first electrolysis module of the plurality of electrolysis modules ([0085] “the control unit 130 may control the second electrochemical filter 122 to perform a water purifying operation when the first electrochemical filter 121 needs to be recycled” where the purifying applied a reverse voltage – [0009], [0126]), control the forward voltage to be applied to a second electrolysis module of the plurality of electrolysis modules while the forward voltage is not applied to the first electrolysis modules of the plurality of electrolysis modules ([0093] “the control unit 130 may control the second electrochemical filter 122 to perform the water purifying operation when the first electrochemical filter 121 performs the recycling operation.),, and rotate between chanting between the control of the forward voltage not to be applied to the first electrolysis module while the control of the forward voltage is applied to the second electrolysis module ([0093] “In this case, when the recycling of the first electrochemical filter 121 has been completed, the control unit 130 may perform a filter switching operation such that the first electrochemical filter 121 performs the water purifying operation.”, [0073]-[0077],[0099], [0074] “The allowable water purification time and the recycling time of the electrochemical filter are preset, depending on the configuration of the electrochemical filter.”). Kwon further discloses a sensor module configured to measure a condition of the water flowing through the water inlet pipe (#221 conductivity sensor which is a measure of the TDS thus satisfying the determination of instant claim 6 – [0120]), wherein the controller is configured to compare the amount of TDSs in the water flowing through the water inlet pipe with a reference concentration (measurement at #221 and compared with reference value from #222 – [0110], [0115]-[0116) determine a number of first electrolysis modules based on the condition of the water flowing through the water inlet pipe, and control the forward voltage not to be applied to the determined number of first electrolysis modules ([0115]-[0118] where the number of modules being determined is inherently 1 due to the explicit use of the first electrochemical filter and wherein the sensor module is configured to measure the magnitude of a current flowing in the water passing the plurality of electrolysis modules, and wherein the controller is configured to determine a number of the first electrolysis modules based on the magnitude of the current. (as required by instant claim 8 – “conductivity sensor” [0123], [0215]-[0217]). As to claim 2, Kwon further discloses wherein the controller is configured to control a reverse voltage so that the reverse voltage is applied to an electrode of the first electrolysis module. ([0085], [0009],[0126]). As to claim 3, Kwon further discloses wherein the controller is configured to control a voltage so that the voltage is not applied to an electrode of the first electrolysis module. (“idle state” [0197] where since it is not operating as a purifier or being regenerated, not voltage is being applied). As to claim 12, Kwon further discloses a flow volume sensor configured to detect flow volume of the water brought in ([0041]), wherein the controller is configured to, when flow volume of the sterilized water flowing out after the water is electrolyzed is equal to or larger than a reference flow volume, control the forward voltage not to be applied to the first electrolysis module of the plurality of electrolysis modules and control the forward voltage to be applied to the second electrolysis module of the plurality of electrolysis modules ([0041], [0110]-[0111]). As to claim 15, Kwon discloses a water purifier comprising: A first connection flow path through which water flows to the water purifier (Path from #110) A second connection flow path through which water flows from the water purifier (path to #140) A filter arranged along the first connection flow path to filter the water (#125) a sterilized water generator (“water treatment apparatus” Title. Figs. 2-4) comprising a water inlet pipe through which water flows to the sterilized water generator (#150 water supply pipe); a water outlet pipe through which sterilized water flows from the sterilized water generator (#170 purified water pipe ); a plurality of electrolysis modules arranged in parallel to each other, along a flow path, between the water inlet pipe and the water outlet pipe, the plurality of electrolysis modules configured to electrolyze the water flowing through the water inlet pipe to produce the sterilized water (#s 121/122 “first electrochemical filter” “Second electrochemical filter” [0099]); and a controller (#130) configured to while the water flowing through the water inlet pipe flows through the plurality of electrolysis modules to the water outlet pipe ([0101], [0087] “he control unit 130 may control the first electrochemical filter 121 to perform the water purifying operation when the second electrochemical filter 121 needs to be recycled.” control a forward voltage not to be applied to a first electrolysis module of the plurality of electrolysis modules ([0085] “the control unit 130 may control the second electrochemical filter 122 to perform a water purifying operation when the first electrochemical filter 121 needs to be recycled” where the purifying applied a reverse voltage – [0009], [0126]), control the forward voltage to be applied to a second electrolysis module of the plurality of electrolysis modules while the forward voltage is not applied to the first electrolysis modules of the plurality of electrolysis modules ([0093] “the control unit 130 may control the second electrochemical filter 122 to perform the water purifying operation when the first electrochemical filter 121 performs the recycling operation.),, and rotate between changing between the control of the forward voltage not to be applied to the first electrolysis module while the control of the forward voltage is applied to the second electrolysis module ([0093] “In this case, when the recycling of the first electrochemical filter 121 has been completed, the control unit 130 may perform a filter switching operation such that the first electrochemical filter 121 performs the water purifying operation.”, [0073]-[0077],[0099], [0074] “The allowable water purification time and the recycling time of the electrochemical filter are preset, depending on the configuration of the electrochemical filter.”). Kwon further discloses a sensor module configured to measure a condition of the water flowing through the water inlet pipe (#221 conductivity sensor which is a measure of the TDS thus satisfying the determination of instant claim 6 – [0120]), wherein the controller is configured to compare the amount of TDSs in the water flowing through the water inlet pipe with a reference concentration (measurement at #221 and compared with reference value from #222 – [0110], [0115]-[0116) determine a number of first electrolysis modules based on the condition of the water flowing through the water inlet pipe, and control the forward voltage not to be applied to the determined number of first electrolysis modules ([0115]-[0118] where the number of modules being determined is inherently 1 due to the explicit use of the first electrochemical filter and wherein the sensor module is configured to measure the magnitude of a current flowing in the water passing the plurality of electrolysis modules, and wherein the controller is configured to determine a number of the first electrolysis modules based on the magnitude of the current. (as required by instant claim 8 – “conductivity sensor” [0123], [0215]-[0217]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kwon in view of Hirota et al (US 2001/0004962 A1) As to claim 7, Kwon discloses sensor module as cited above but fails to explicitly disclose wherein the sensor module is configured to measure water temperature of the water flowing through the water inlet pipe, and wherein the controller is configured to determine a number of the first electrolysis modules based on the water temperature of the water flowing through the water inlet pipe Hirota discloses an electrolytic apparatus comprising wherein the sensor module is configured to measure water temperature of the water flowing through the water inlet pipe, and wherein the controller is configured to determine a number of the first electrolysis modules based on the water temperature of the water flowing through the water inlet pipe ([0029]) Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to have used temperature sensor module as taught by Hirota in the apparatus of Kwon because it is possible to safely and most suitably sterilize the water in the ranges of the heat-resistant temperatures of the electrolytic tank and the water treating path ([0030]). Claim 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kwon, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nakatani et al (JP 2002/028653 A). As to claims 13 and 13, Kwon fails to explicitly disclose a display or notifier as instantly claimed associated with the controller. Nakatani further discloses a display, wherein the controller is configured to control the display to display an indication of an electrolysis module required to be replaced among the plurality of electrolysis modules. (display unit 7 [0017] as required by instant claim 13) and a notifier, wherein the controller is configured to control the notifier to output an alarm indicating an electrolysis module causing a malfunction or fault among the plurality of electrolysis modules. ([0017] “alarm” as required by instant claim 14). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to have used an explicit display and notifier as disclosed in Nakatani with the controller of Kwon in order to display information with respect to the electrolysis modules and enable indication of a malfunction of the system. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11March 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant provides a summary of the amended subject matter on pgs. 6-7 of the response. In response to Applicant’s arguments on pg. 8 that Kwon does not disclose comparing the conductivity after the water sterilization, this argument is not persuasive because sensor #221 does perform the claimed TDS reading on the inlet water as confirmed by Applicant’s citation at pg. 8 lines 1-4 of the response. Applicant further alleges that Kwon does not disclose comparing the amount of TDS with a reference concentration. This argument is not persuasive as Kwon compares the values between sensors 221 and 222. Thus, in this instance, sensor 222 provides a reference value for which to compare the value from 221. This difference is necessarily a comparison between the two values absent further recitation as to the type of comparison or the like. In response to Applicant’s argument that Kwon does not inherently determine a number of modules for use, this argument is not persuasive because upon determining to perform sterilization, Kwon inherently determines the one module as being used. The claims merely require “a number” be determined when a forward voltage is applied. When Kwon determines to apply the voltage, it is to one of the cells in parallel, regardless as to which one. Thus, absent further recitation as to how the number is determined, either formulaically or choosing two or more modules to apply the forward voltage, the recitation is deemed met. In response to Applicant’s argument that Kwon does not disclose controlling the forward voltage no tot be applied to the determine number of first electrolysis modules, this argument is not persuasive because Kwon only applied the forward voltage to a singular module at one time, thereby rendering the other cell as not receiving the forward voltage. No further arguments are presented. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LOUIS J RUFO whose telephone number is (571)270-7716. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 9 am to 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Luan Van can be reached at 571-272-8521. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LOUIS J RUFO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Aug 06, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Nov 21, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680186
APPARATUS FOR PLATING AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING APPARATUS FOR PLATING
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674063
ELECTROCOATING COMPOSITION
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12637624
FLUIDIZED CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT SYSTEM WITH INTEGRATED REFORMER-ELECTROLYZER-PURIFIER
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12624464
ELECTROLYSIS DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612533
ELECTROCOATING COMPOSITION
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+23.2%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month