Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/727,300

POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 22, 2022
Examiner
ZEMUI, NATHANAEL T
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
257 granted / 458 resolved
-8.9% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
520
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
63.2%
+23.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 458 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 19, 21, 23-25, 27, 29-42 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 19, 21, 23-25, 27 & 29-42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mikami (US 2021/0083281 A1) in view of Li (US 2018/0006302 A1). Regarding claims 19, 21, 23-25, 27 & 29-42, Mikami teaches a lithium ion secondary battery comprising a positive electrode, a negative electrode and an electrolyte solution ([0120]-[0125]), wherein the positive electrode includes a positive electrode active material particle comprising lithium cobalt oxide comprising Mg, F, at least one of Ti and Al, and at least one of Ni and Mn; wherein concentrations of both magnesium and nickel in a surface portion (i.e in a region in contact with the electrolyte solution), defined as a region from a surface of the positive electrode active material particle to a depth of 10 nm, of the positive electrode active material particle are higher than concentrations of magnesium and nickel in an inner portion of the positive electrode active material particle ([0091]-[0115] & [0146]-[0174]); wherein the number of nickel atoms is very small when sum of the number of nickel atoms and cobalt atoms in the active material is 100% ([0174]); wherein the positive electrode active material comprises a pseudo-spinel crystal structure in a charged state and an O3 crystal structure in a discharged state ([0093] & [0426]) and wherein a XRD pattern of the positive electrode active material in a state in which the positive electrode active material is charged at 4.7 V, has at least a first diffraction peak at 2Ɵ of 19.3 ± 0.2° and a second diffraction peak at 2Ɵ of 45.5 ± 0.1° when the positive electrode is analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction using CuKa1 ray (Fig. 30; [0426]). Mikami is silent as to wherein a concentration of nickel in the surface portion of the positive electrode active material particle is higher than a concentration of nickel in the inner portion of the positive electrode active material and wherein the number of nickel atoms is lower than 7.5% when sum of the number of nickel atoms and cobalt atoms in the active material is 100%. Li teaches a positive electrode active material comprising a lithium cobalt oxide comprising Ni, Mn, Al and Mg; wherein concentrations of both magnesium and nickel in a surface portion (i.e coating layer) of the positive electrode active material particle are higher than concentrations of magnesium and nickel in an inner portion (i.e core) of the positive electrode active material particle; wherein the number of nickel atoms is lower than 7.5% when sum of the number of nickel atoms and cobalt atoms in the active material is 100% ([0027]-[0037]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the present invention, to set a concentration of nickel in the surface portion of the positive electrode active material particle is higher than a concentration of nickel in the inner portion of the positive electrode active material such that the number of nickel atoms is lower than 7.5% when sum of the number of nickel atoms and cobalt atoms in the active material is 100% in order to increase lithium ion deintercalation/intercalation kinetic performance in the surface coating layer while providing a lithium ion deintercalation/intercalation framework as taught by Li ([0020]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 1-2 of Remarks, filed 08/27/2025, with respect to the rejections of claims 19, 21, 23-25, 27, 29-42 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of Mikami as modified by Li as presented above. Thus, in view of the foregoing, claims 19, 21, 23-25, 27, 29-42 stand rejected. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANAEL T ZEMUI whose telephone number is (571)272-4894. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BARBARA GILLIAM can be reached on (571)272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANAEL T ZEMUI/Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2022
Application Filed
May 10, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 12, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 12, 2022
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 17, 2023
Response Filed
Mar 15, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 16, 2023
Response Filed
Jul 11, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 14, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 18, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
May 02, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
May 05, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 30, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 03, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 19, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 10, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 10, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 21, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 27, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597636
SOLID-STATE COMPOSITE POLYMER ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE AND ALL-SOLID-STATE LITHIUM ION BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586875
METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES, IN PARTICULAR HIGH-POWER BATTERIES, AND BATTERY OBTAINED BY THIS METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573657
SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573665
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ALL SOLID-STATE LITHIUM BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573626
NICKEL COBALT LITHIUM MANGANESE CATHODE MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF AND LITHIUM ION BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+25.1%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 458 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month