Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/730,765

MACROCHIP WITH INTERCONNECT STACK FOR POWER DELIVERY AND SIGNAL ROUTING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 27, 2022
Examiner
TRAN, TONY
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
597 granted / 850 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
911
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
59.0%
+19.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(2) as being anticipated by Or-Bach (Pub. No.: US 2021/0358794). PNG media_image1.png 736 1380 media_image1.png Greyscale Re claim 1, Or-Bach, Fig. 22 [as shown above] teaches a device comprising: a host substrate [S] including two or more circuit regions, wherein the two or more circuit regions comprise a first circuit region [FCR] and a second circuit region [SCR] separated by a gap [G] on the host substrate [S]; the first circuit region being associated with a first reticle size (the outline boundary occupied by [FCR], note that [FCR] is including the STI oxide region), the second circuit region being associated with a second reticle size (the outline boundary occupied by [SCR], note that [SCR] is including a little connection region on the far left), the first reticle size and the second reticle size being different; a component stack [CS] comprising one or more first stacks [FS], each of the one or more first stacks including one or more electrical components (611-620) on one or more layers, each of the one or more first stacks electrically connected to at least one of the two or more circuit regions (two transistors on the left) on the host substrate [S]; and an interconnect die [ID] comprising one or more second stacks [SS] providing electrical connections between the two or more circuit regions, the one or more second stacks further providing electrical power (by 6001-6009) to the two or more circuit regions (two transistors on the right), wherein at least some of the second stacks (among [6011-6019/6001-6009]) are positioned to span across the gap [G] between the first [FCR] and second circuit regions [SSR] to provide electrical connections between the first [FCR] and second [SCR] circuit regions, wherein at least some of the second stacks include an insulator wafer [IW] bonded to the interconnect die [ID], the interconnect die further connected to at least one of the two or more circuit regions, the first circuit region [FCR] and the second circuit region [SCR] being positioned between the host substrate and the interconnect die; wherein at least one of the one or more second stacks includes a first electrical pathway to provide the electrical power (6011-6020/6001-6010) to at least one of the two or more circuit regions, the first electrical pathway including an electrically-conductive via (6011-6020/6001-6010) through the insulator wafer [IW] and at least one of an electrically-conductive via through the interconnect die [ID]; and wherein the interconnect die of at least one of the one or more second stacks includes one or more second electrical pathways (6011-6020/6001-6010) to provide electrical connections between at least two of the two or more circuit regions (two transistors on the left & right). Re claim 2, Or-Bach teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the insulator wafer of at least one of the one or more second stacks comprises glass (7014/808, Fig. 27C, [0336]/[0162]). Re claim 3, Or-Bach, Fig. 22 teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the die of at least one of the one or more second stacks comprises one or more patterned semiconductor layers (N+/P+). Re claim 4, Or-Bach, Fig. 22 teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the one or more second stacks and the one or more first stacks are electrically connected to the host substrate using direct copper bonds [0155]. Re claim 5, Or-Bach teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the die of at least one of the one or more second stacks comprises passive electrical elements (“resistors and capacitors and inductors”, FIG. 1I, [0162]). Re claim 6, Or-Bach teaches the device of claim 5, wherein the die of at least one of the one or more second stacks further incudes at least one active electrical element (transistors, FIG. 1I, [0162]). Re claim 7, Or-Bach teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the host substrate is formed from a monolithic wafer (808, FIG. 1I, [0162]). Re claim 8, Or-Bach teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the host substrate is formed from a reconstituted wafer including a carrier wafer (808, FIG. 1I, [0162]) and two or more host dies (transistors), wherein the two or more circuit regions are distributed between the two or more host dies. Re claim 9, Or-Bach teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the capacitor in the die comprises a deep trench capacitor (FIGS. 79A-C). Re claim 10, Or-Bach teaches the device of claim 1, further comprising: at least one of a printed circuit board or an interposer (19D06, FIG. 7E, [0182]) located in a secondary plane and connected to faces of at least some of the one or more first stacks (including 19D22) or the one or more second stacks (including 19D22) opposite the host substrate (19D16). Re claim 11, Or-Bach, Fig. 22 teaches the device of claim 10, further comprising: circuitry in the secondary plane (circuitry of 6022) to provide power to the two or more circuit regions (circuitry of 6024) through at least one of the one or more second stacks. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 01/07/2026 have been fully considered but they are moot due to a new ground [NEW MATCHING ELEMENTS] of rejection as listed above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONY TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1749. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8AM-5PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached on 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONY TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 27, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Interview Requested
Sep 25, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 01, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
May 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 14, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Sep 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 07, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604527
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598731
MEMORY DEVICE USING SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593677
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE WITH ENERGY REMOVABLE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588395
Display Substrate and Preparation Method thereof, and Display Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588288
ACTIVE DEVICE SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month