Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/770,237

MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM, PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF TRANSPORTING A CARRIER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 19, 2022
Examiner
JONES, JAMES WILLIAM
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
81 granted / 111 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
139
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 111 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1, 3, 5, 7-9, 11-14, and 16-21 are currently pending. Claims 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15 are cancelled. Claims 1, 8, 11, 13, 14, and 17 are currently amended. Claims 1, 3, 7-9, 11-14, 16-19, and 21 are rejected under new grounds as necessitated by applicant’s amendments filed 20 November 2025. A response to applicant’s remarks can be found at the end of this Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3, 7-9, 11-12, 14, 16-18 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukasawa (US 20150188399 A1). In regards to claim 1, Fukasawa teaches a magnetic levitation system for transporting a carrier in a transport direction, comprising: a plurality (as seen in Fig. 12, 404 and 405) of magnetic bearings (A) (Fig. 5) having a first actuator (401) with a U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) for contactlessly holding (para. [0060]) the carrier (101) in a carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5), the first actuator (401) arranged above (as seen in Fig. 6A) the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5); and a plurality (as seen in Fig. 12, 404 and 405) of drive units (650) (Fig. 5) having a second actuator (601) for moving the carrier (101) (Fig. 5) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A), wherein the second actuator (601) (Fig. 6A) or a projection of the second actuator (601) along the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A) is partially surrounded (as seen in Fig. 6A) by the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) comprising a U-shaped core (as seen in Fig. 6A) with two legs (410, 420), the two legs (410, 420) being directed toward the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5) and an end of each of the two legs providing two poles (423) of the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) for exerting magnetic levitation forces on the carrier (101); and a contactless guiding arrangement (B) (Fig. 5) for guiding the carrier (101) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A) arranged in a lower portion (as seen in Fig. 5) of the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5), the contactless guiding arrangement (B) including one or more passive magnetic bearings adapted for generating a static magnetic field (para. [0055], lines 5-7; para. [0066]; para. [0081]; each element of the contactless guiding arrangement B “may be made of permanent magnets”), and wherein both the first actuator (401) (Fig. 5) and the second actuator (601) are centered above (as seen in Fig. 5) the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5), and wherein the second actuator (601) While Fukasawa does not explicitly teach that the second actuator is arranged offset relative to the first actuator, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the second actuator being arranged offset relative to the first actuator with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of increasing the resilience and ease of maintenance of the magnetic bearings and drive units, since it has been held that constructing a formerly integral structure in various elements involves only routine skill in the art. In re Dulberg, 289 F.2d 522, 523, 129 USPQ 348, 349 (CCPA 1961). See MPEP § 2144.04(V)(C). In regards to claim 3, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 1, wherein the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) (Fig. 5) surrounds the second actuator (601) or the projection of the second actuator on two opposite lateral sides (as seen in Fig. 5) While Fukasawa does not explicitly teach the U-shaped electromagnet surrounding the second actuator on one of a top side and a bottom side. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to surround the second actuator on the top or bottom side with the U-shaped electromagnet with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of further securing the second actuator in the vertical direction, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). See MPEP § 2144.04(VI)(C). In regards to claim 7, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 1, wherein the second actuator (601) (Fig. 5) is a stator (para. [0073]) of a linear motor (650). In regards to claim 8, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 1, wherein the plurality (as seen in Fig. 12, 404 and 405) of magnetic bearings (A) (Fig. 5) are actively controllable (para. [0069], lines 3-6) magnetic bearings comprising the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) configured to be actively controlled (para. [0069], lines 3-6) for maintaining a specified distance between (para. [0069], lines 13-14) the first actuator (401) (Fig. 5) and the carrier (101). In regards to claim 9, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 1, wherein the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5) is a vertical carrier transportation space having a height H extending in a vertical direction (as seen in Fig. 5) and a width W extending in a lateral direction (as seen in Fig. 5), wherein an aspect ratio of H/W is H/W > 5 (the ratio of the height of 101 over the width of 101 is clearly greater than 5). In regards to claim 11, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 1, further comprising the carrier (101) (Fig. 5), wherein the carrier includes a magnetic counterpart (211) with two surfaces (211a, 211b) (Fig. 6A) extending parallel (as seen in Fig. 6A) to each other along a top surface (as seen in Fig. 6A, the top surfaces of 211a and 211b extend parallel to each other along a top surface of 101) of the carrier (101) for magnetically interacting with the first actuator (401) and a drive counterpart (251) for magnetically interacting with the second actuator (601), the drive counterpart (251) extending between (as seen in Fig. 5) the two surfaces of the magnetic counterpart (211) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A). In regards to claim 12, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 11, wherein the magnetic counterpart includes a first guided zone (430) (Fig. 4A) and a second guided zone (see annotated Fig. 4A below), wherein a recessed zone (441) is arranged between (as seen in Fig. 4A) the first guided zone (430) and the second guided zone (see annotated Fig. 4A below) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A) of the carrier (101) (Fig. 5), the recessed zone (441) being recessed with respect (as seen in Fig. 4A) to the first guided zone (430) and the second guided zone (see annotated Fig. 4A below). PNG media_image1.png 324 447 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 14, Fukasawa teaches a method of transporting a carrier in a transport direction, comprising: contactlessly holding (para. [0060]) the carrier (101) in a carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5) using a plurality (as seen in Fig. 12, 404 and 405) of magnetic bearings (A) (Fig. 5) having a first actuator (401) with a U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420); and transporting the carrier (101) (Fig. 5) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A) using a plurality (as seen in Fig. 12, 404 and 405) of drive units (650) having a second actuator (601), wherein the second actuator (601) (Fig. 6A) or a projection of the second actuator (601) along the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A) is partially surrounded (as seen in Fig. 6A) by the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) comprising a U-shaped core (as seen in Fig. 6A) with two legs (410, 420), the two legs (410, 420) being directed toward the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5) and an end of each of the two legs providing two poles (423) of the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) for exerting magnetic levitation forces on the carrier (101), wherein the second actuator (601) contactlessly guiding the carrier (101) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A) by employing a contactless guiding arrangement (B) (Fig. 5) arranged in a lower portion (as seen in Fig. 5) of the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5), the contactless guiding arrangement (B) including one or more passive magnetic bearings adapted for generating a static magnetic field (para. [0055], lines 5-7; para. [0066]; para. [0081]; each element of the contactless guiding arrangement B “may be made of permanent magnets”). While Fukasawa does not explicitly teach that the second actuator is arranged offset relative to the first actuator, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the second actuator being arranged offset relative to the first actuator with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of increasing the resilience and ease of maintenance of the magnetic bearings and drive units, since it has been held that constructing a formerly integral structure in various elements involves only routine skill in the art. In re Dulberg, 289 F.2d 522, 523, 129 USPQ 348, 349 (CCPA 1961). See MPEP § 2144.04(V)(C). In regards to claim 16, Fukasawa teaches the method of claim 14, wherein, during carrier transport, the two legs of the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) (Fig. 6A) are directed toward (as seen in Fig. 6A) two surfaces of a magnetic counterpart (211) extending along a top part (as seen in Fig. 6A, the top surfaces of 211a and 211b extend parallel to each other along a top surface of 101) of the carrier (101) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A), and the second actuator (601) magnetically interacts with a drive counterpart (251) arranged between the two surfaces (as seen in Fig. 6A). In regards to claim 17, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 1, wherein, during carrier transport, the first actuator (401) (Fig. 5) and the second actuator (601) are centrally arranged above (as seen in Fig. 5, the location of A) a center of gravity of the carrier (101). In regards to claim 18, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 1, wherein the two legs (410, 420) (Fig. 6A) are configured for magnetically interacting with a magnetic counterpart (211) having two surfaces extending parallel to each other along a top (as seen in Fig. 6A, the top surfaces of 211a and 211b extend parallel to each other along a top surface of 101) or bottom surface of the carrier (101). Claim(s) 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukasawa (US 20150188399 A1) in view of Bender (WO 2018145751 A1). In regards to claim 13, Fukasawa teaches a processing system for vertically processing a substrate, comprising: one or more magnetic levitation systems (10) (Fig. 2) for transporting one or more carriers (101) in a transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A), the one or more magnetic levitation systems (10) comprising: a plurality (as seen in Fig. 12, 404 and 405) of magnetic bearings (A) (Fig. 5) having a first actuator (401) with a U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) for contactlessly holding (para. [0060]) the carrier (101) in a carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5), the first actuator (401) arranged above (as seen in Fig. 5) the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5); and a plurality (as seen in Fig. 12, 404 and 405) of drive units (650) having a second actuator (601) for moving the carrier (101) (Fig. 5) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A), wherein the second actuator (601) (Fig. 6A) or a projection of the second actuator (601) along the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A) is partially surrounded (as seen in Fig. 6A) by the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) comprising a U-shaped core (as seen in Fig. 6A) with two legs (410, 420), the two legs (410, 420) being directed toward the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5) and an end of each of the two legs providing two poles (423) of the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) for exerting magnetic levitation forces on the carrier (101); and a contactless guiding arrangement (B) (Fig. 5) for guiding the carrier (101) in the transport direction (D) (Fig. 7A) arranged in a lower portion (as seen in Fig. 5) of the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5), the contactless guiding arrangement (B) including one or more passive magnetic bearings adapted for generating a static magnetic field (para. [0055], lines 5-7; para. [0066]; para. [0081]; each element of the contactless guiding arrangement B “may be made of permanent magnets”), and wherein both the first actuator (401) (Fig. 5) and the second actuator (601) are centered above (as seen in Fig. 5) the carrier transportation space (the area where 101 is located in Fig. 5), and wherein the second actuator (601) Fukasawa does not explicitly teach at least one vacuum chamber. Bender teaches at least one vacuum chamber (para. [0062], lines 13-15). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the substrate processing system of Fukasawa to include a vacuum chamber as taught by Bender with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of providing a clean space devoid of matter for processing (see Bender, para. [0062], lines 8-10). While Fukasawa does not explicitly teach that the second actuator is arranged offset relative to the first actuator, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the second actuator being arranged offset relative to the first actuator with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of increasing the resilience and ease of maintenance of the magnetic bearings and drive units, since it has been held that constructing a formerly integral structure in various elements involves only routine skill in the art. In re Dulberg, 289 F.2d 522, 523, 129 USPQ 348, 349 (CCPA 1961). See MPEP § 2144.04(V)(C). Claim(s) 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukasawa (US 20150188399 A1) in view of Chang (KR 100675559 B1). In regards to claim 19, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 7, Fukasawa does not teach wherein the linear motor is a synchronous linear motor. Chang teaches wherein the linear motor is a synchronous linear motor (see machine translation, pg. 3, lines 102-104). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the linear motor of Fukasawa to include a synchronous linear motor as taught by Chang with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of directly generating linear power without a separate conversion device (see Chang, pg. 6, lines 307-309). Claim(s) 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukasawa (US 20150188399 A1) in view of Mori (US 5641054 A). In regards to claim 21, Fukasawa teaches the magnetic levitation system of claim 1, wherein the U-shaped electromagnet (410, 420) (Fig. 6A) is configured Fukasawa does not teach the U-shaped electromagnet to be actively controlled in a closed loop or feedback control. Mori teaches active control with a closed loop (col. 13, lines 58-59). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified magnetic levitation system of Fukasawa to include active control with a closed loop as taught by Mori with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of more precisely controlling the position of the carriage (col. 14, lines 6-10). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: As discussed in the prior Office Action dated 07 July 2025, claim 5 is allowed. Claim 20 is allowed due to dependence upon claim 5. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 20 November 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Fukasawa is completely silent regarding the second actuator being arranged offset relative to the first actuator. Examiner refers to the rejections above indicating that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the second actuator being arranged offset relative to the first actuator with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of increasing the resilience and ease of maintenance of the magnetic bearings and drive units, since it has been held that constructing a formerly integral structure in various elements involves only routine skill in the art. In re Dulberg, 289 F.2d 522, 523, 129 USPQ 348, 349 (CCPA 1961). See MPEP § 2144.04(V)(C). Applicant argues that Fukasawa does not teach a contactless guiding arrangement for guiding the carrier in the transport direction arranged in a lower portion of the carrier space, wherein the contactless guiding arrangement includes one or more passive magnetic bearings adapted for generating a static magnetic field. Examiner disagrees and refers to the rejections of claims 1, and 13-14 above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES WILLIAM JONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7063. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 11am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Samuel Morano can be reached at (571) 272-6684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES WILLIAM JONES/ Examiner, Art Unit 3615 /S. Joseph Morano/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 09, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594971
FLUID CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594200
RAIL VEHICLE WITH FULLY INTEGRATED WHEELCHAIR ZONE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583374
HANDRAIL FOR RAILROAD VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CHANGING NATURAL FREQUENCY OF SAID HANDRAIL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565245
RAILWAY VEHICLE WITH COLLISION-PROTECTING CRUSHABLE AREAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12552422
ELASTOMER CUSHION UNIT FOR RAILCAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.7%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 111 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month