Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 17/792,943

LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT SOLVENT, LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT INK COMPRISING SAME, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 14, 2022
Priority
Jan 15, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0005386 +2 more
Examiner
GODENSCHWAGER, PETER F
Art Unit
1767
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
698 granted / 1028 resolved
+2.9% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1049
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1028 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on May 4, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Masaki et al. (GB 2231580 A). Masaki et al. teaches the solvent tetrapropylene glycol monomethyl ether, a compound of Chemical Formula 2 where n is 2, and R2 is C1 alkyl (Pg. 6). The Office realizes that all of the claimed effects or physical properties are not positively stated by the reference(s). However, the reference(s) teaches all of the claimed ingredients in the claimed amounts made by a substantially similar process. The original specification does not identify a feature that results in the claimed effect or physical property outside of the presence of the claimed components in the claimed amount. Therefore, the claimed effects and physical properties, i.e. pKa and viscosity would naturally arise and be achieved by a composition with all the claimed ingredients. "Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties." In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658 (Fed. Cir. 1990). A chemical composition and its properties are inseparable. Therefore, if the prior art teaches the identical chemical structure, the properties applicant discloses and/or claims are necessarily present. See MPEP § 2112.01. If it is the applicant’s position that this would not be the case: (1) evidence would need to be provided to support the applicant’s position; and (2) it would be the Office’s position that the application contains inadequate disclosure that there is no teaching as to how to obtain the claimed properties with only the claimed ingredients. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed May 4, 2026 have been fully considered and sufficiently responded to in the new grounds of rejection as set forth above. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER F GODENSCHWAGER whose telephone number is (571)270-3302. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00, M-F EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Eashoo can be reached at 571-272-1197. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER F GODENSCHWAGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1767 June 11, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Nov 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 11, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703631
METHOD OF PRODUCING LITHIUM SULFIDE WITHOUT USING HYDROGEN SULFIDE GAS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12680009
HEAT TRANSFER FLUID COMPOSITION WITH IMPROVED THERMAL STABILITY
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12655337
USE OF COMPOSITION AS REFRIGERANT, AND REFRIGERATION CYCLE APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644032
SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES OF THERMAL FLUID RECLAMATION
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637863
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1028 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month