Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/795,198

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 25, 2022
Priority
Feb 14, 2020 — JP 2020-023747 +1 more
Examiner
SRINIVASAN, SESHA SAIRAMAN
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rohm Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
24 granted / 36 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
104
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
94.7%
+54.7% vs TC avg
§102
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 36 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment with respect to claims 1, 9,11, and 17 filed on 01/23/2026 have been fully considered for examination based on their merits. The previously presented claims 4-8, 10, 12-16, and 18-20 have been considered. Claims 2-3 are canceled. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, pages 8-17, filed 01/23/2026, with respect to claim(s) 1, and 4-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, and 4-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Taichi Karino et al, (hereinafter KARINO), US 20150200309 A1, in view of Jae Hoon Park et al, (hereinafter PARK), US 20150187868 A1. Regarding Claim 1, KARINO teaches a semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET) comprising: a semiconductor chip (Fig. 2A, 102/103, first/second JFET part) which has a main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate); a high potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) which is formed in a surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate); a low potential region (Fig. 2A, 3/7, n-source region/n+ source region) which is formed in the surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate) at an interval (annotated Figure 2A) from the high potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region); PNG media_image1.png 641 866 media_image1.png Greyscale a drift region of a first conductivity type (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) which is formed as a current path ([0084]) in a region (Fig. 2A, p-floating region, [0084]) between the high potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) and the low potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) in the surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate); and resurf regions of the first conductivity type which have a first conductivity type impurity concentration higher than a first conductivity type impurity concentration of the drift region, and which are formed partially in a surface layer portion of the drift region as current paths having a resistance lower than a resistance of the drift region (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure lowers the resistance and the ON resistance further meaning, a higher doping concentration than the drift region and with n-type impurities similar to drift region; [0089]); wherein the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure; [0089]) are formed in the surface layer portion of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) at an interval from each other (annotated Figure 2A), PNG media_image2.png 641 866 media_image2.png Greyscale the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure; [0089]) are each formed as a line extending in an opposing direction in which the high potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) and the low potential region (Fig. 2A, 3/7, n-source region/n+ source region) oppose each other, and expose a part (annotated Figure 2A) of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) as a line from the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate), and the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) are formed in the surface layer portion of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) at an interval (annotated Figure 2A) from a bottom portion of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) toward the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate) and exposed from the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate). PNG media_image3.png 641 866 media_image3.png Greyscale Though KARINO teaches the resurf regions similar to p-floating region (18), which is of second type conductivity, but based on the lower resistance and the ON resistance of the resurf region, [0089], the resurf region is believed to possess higher impurity concentration than the drift region with similar first type conductivity, such as n-type. However, KARINO does not explicitly disclose or suggest that a semiconductor device comprising: resurf regions of the first conductivity type which have a first conductivity type impurity concentration higher than a first conductivity type impurity concentration of the drift region, and which are formed partially in a surface layer portion of the drift region as current paths the drift region. PARK teaches a semiconductor device (Fig. 1, power semiconductor device, [0035]) comprising: resurf regions (Fig. 1, 180, [0082-0083]) of the first conductivity which have a first conductivity type (Fig. 1, 180a, n-type first semiconductor region, [0027], [0083]) impurity concentration higher than a first conductivity type impurity concentration of the drift region, and which are formed partially in a surface layer portion of the drift region (Fig. 1, 110, drift region may be formed by injecting an n-type impurity at a low concentration, [0051]) as current paths the drift region ([0008], [0110]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to have modified KARINO to incorporate the teachings of PARK such that a semiconductor device comprising: a semiconductor device comprising: resurf regions of the first conductivity type which have a first conductivity type impurity concentration higher than a first conductivity type impurity concentration of the drift region, and which are formed partially in a surface layer portion of the drift region as current paths the drift region. This enables the active area in which the current may flow may be maximized in the power semiconductor device, thereby improving performance of the semiconductor device (PARK, [0110]). Regarding Claim 4, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 1. PARK further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, power semiconductor device, [0035]), wherein the resurf regions (Fig. 1, 180, [0082-0083]) are formed in a striped shape (Fig. 1, 180 or 180a/180b, [0094]) extending in the opposing direction (Fig. 1, X or -X direction) and expose a part of the drift region (Fig. 1, 110, drift region may be formed by injecting an n-type impurity at a low concentration, [0051]) in a striped shape (Fig. 1, 180 or 180a/180b, [0094]) from the main surface (Fig. 1, 111, buffer region). Regarding Claim 5, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 1. PARK further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, power semiconductor device, [0035]), further comprising: a field insulating film (Fig. 1, 161, insulating film) which covers the drift region (Fig. 1, 110, drift region may be formed by injecting an n-type impurity at a low concentration, [0051]) and the resurf regions (Fig. 1, 180, [0082-0083]) on the main surface (Fig. 1, 111, buffer region, and KARINO further teaches a semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET), further comprising: a field electrode (Figs. 10A/10B, 80, polysilicon electrode) which is led around as a line on the field insulating film (Fig. 10B, 81, interlayer insulating layer) and traverses the resurf region (Figs. 2A/10B, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type); [0008]) in a plan view (Fig 10A, 81 (not explicitly shown), [0008]). Regarding Claim 6 KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 5. KARINO further teaches a semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET), wherein the field electrode (Figs. 10A/10B, 80, polysilicon electrode) traverses the resurf regions multiple times in a plan view (Figs. 2A/10B, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type); 79, LOCOS oxide film, [0008]). Regarding Claim 7, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 5. KARINO further teaches a semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET), wherein the field electrode (Figs. 10A/10B, 80, polysilicon electrode) surrounds the high potential region multiple times (Figs. 10A/10B, 75/78, n-drain region/n+ drain region, [0008]). Regarding Claim 8, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 5. KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET), wherein the field electrode (Figs. 10A/10B, 80, polysilicon electrode) is constituted of a field resistance film (Fig. 10B, 79, LOCOS oxide film, [0008]) which is electrically connected to the high potential region and the low potential region (Figs. 10A/10B, [0008], [0079]). Regarding Claim 9, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 5. KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET) wherein the high potential region includes a drain region of the first conductivity type (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) which is formed in a surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate); the low potential region includes a body region of a second conductivity type (Fig. 2A, 2/6, p-gate region/p+ gate region) which is formed in the surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate) and a source region of the first conductivity type (Fig. 2A, 3/7, n-source region/n+ source region) which is formed in a surface layer (Fig. 2A, 19, pn junction) of the body region (Fig. 2A, 2/6, p-gate region/p+ gate region), the drift region (Fig. 1, 110) is formed in a region between the drain region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) and the body region (Fig. 2A, 2/6, p-gate region/p+ gate region) in the surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate), and the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure; [0089]) are formed in a region between the drain region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) and the source region (Fig. 2A, 3/7, n-source region/n+ source region) in the surface layer portion of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region). Regarding Claim 10, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 9. PARK further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, power semiconductor device, [0035]), wherein the resurf regions (Fig. 1, 180) are connected to the body region (Fig. 1, 181, deep body region). Regarding Claim 11, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 9. KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET) wherein the high potential region (Fig. 2A, VH, high voltage terminal) includes a well region of the first conductivity type (Fig. 2A, 5, n-drain region) which is formed in the surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate) and the drain region (Fig. 2A, 8, n+ drain region) which is formed in a surface layer portion of the well region (Fig. 2A, 5, n-drain region), and the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure; [0089]) are formed in a region between the well region (Fig. 2A, 5, n-drain region) and the source region (Fig. 2A, 3/7, n-source region/n+ source region) in the surface layer portion of the drift region (Fig. 1, 110). Regarding Claim 12, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 11. KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET) wherein the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure; [0089]) are connected to the well region (Fig. 2A, 5, n-drain region). Regarding Claim 13, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 9. KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET) wherein the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure; [0089]) are formed only in a region sandwiched between the source region (Fig. 2A, 3/7, n-source region/n+ source region) and the drain region (Fig. 2A, 8, n+ drain region) in the drift region (Fig. 1, 110). Regarding Claim 14, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim . KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET) wherein the body region (Figs. 1/2A, 2/6, p-gate region/p+ gate region) surrounds the drain region (Figs. 1/2A, 8, n+ drain region), and the source region is formed (Figs. 1/2A, 3/7, n-source region/n+ source region) in a shape (Fig. 1, circular shape, [0009]) having ends in the surface layer portion of the body region (Figs. 1/2A, 2/6, p-gate region/p+ gate region). Regarding Claim 15, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 9. PARK further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, power semiconductor device, [0035]), further comprising: a channel region (Fig. 1, 140/142, conductive material in the trench gate, channel C formed, [0068-0070]) which is formed between the drift region (Fig. 1, 110) and the source region (Fig. 1, 130, emitter region) in the surface layer portion of the body region (Fig. 1, 120), a gate insulating film (Fig. 1, 141, gate insulating layer) which covers the channel region (Fig. 1, 140/142, conductive material in the trench gate, channel C formed, [0068-0070]) on the main surface (Fig. 111, buffer region), and a gate electrode (Fig. 1, 142, [0067])which is formed on the gate insulating film (Fig. 1, 141, gate insulating layer). Regarding Claim 16, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 15. KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET) wherein the gate insulating film (Fig. 2A, 11, interlayer insulating film) covers the drift region (Fig. 1, 110) and the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure; [0089]). Regarding Claim 17, KARINO teaches a semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET) comprising: a semiconductor chip (Fig. 2A, 102/103, first/second JFET part) which has a main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate); a high potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) which is formed in a surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate); a drift region of a first conductivity type (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) which is formed as a current path ([0084]) in a region (Fig. 2A, p-floating region, [0084]) between the high potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) and the low potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) in the surface layer portion of the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate); resurf regions of the first conductivity type which have a first conductivity type impurity concentration higher than a first conductivity type impurity concentration of the drift region, and which are formed partially in a surface layer portion of the drift region as current paths having a resistance lower than a resistance of the drift region (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure lowers the resistance and the ON resistance further meaning, a higher doping concentration than the drift region and with n-type impurities similar to drift region; [0089]) and extends as a line in an opposing direction in which the high potential region (Fig. 2A, 5/8, n-drain region/n+ drain region) and the low potential region (Fig. 2A, 3/7, n-source region/n+ source region) oppose each other, and expose a part (annotated Figure 2A) of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) as a line from the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate), PNG media_image4.png 641 866 media_image4.png Greyscale a field insulating film (Fig. 10B, 81, interlayer insulating layer) which covers the drift region (Fig. 10B, 74) and the resurf regions (Figs. 2A/10B, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type); [0008]), and a field electrode (Figs. 10A/10B, 80, polysilicon electrode) which is led around as a line on the field insulating film (Fig. 10B, 81, interlayer insulating layer) and traverses the resurf region (Figs. 2A/10B, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type); [0008]) in a plan view (Fig 10A, 81 (not explicitly shown), [0008]). wherein the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) structure; [0089]) are formed in the surface layer portion of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) at an interval from each other (annotated Figure 2A), and the resurf regions (Fig. 2A, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type) are formed in the surface layer portion of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) at an interval (annotated Figure 2A) from a bottom portion of the drift region (Fig. 2A, 4, n-drift region) toward the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate) and exposed from the main surface (Fig. 2A, 1, p-semiconductor substrate). PNG media_image5.png 641 866 media_image5.png Greyscale Though KARINO teaches the resurf regions similar to p-floating region (18), which is of second type conductivity, but based on the lower resistance and the ON resistance of the resurf region, [0089], the resurf region is believed to possess higher impurity concentration than the drift region with similar first type conductivity, such as n-type. However, KARINO does not explicitly disclose or suggest that a semiconductor device comprising: resurf regions of the first conductivity type which have a first conductivity type impurity concentration higher than a first conductivity type impurity concentration of the drift region, and which are formed partially in a surface layer portion of the drift region as current paths the drift region. PARK teaches a semiconductor device (Fig. 1, power semiconductor device, [0035]) comprising: resurf regions (Fig. 1, 180, [0082-0083]) of the first conductivity which have a first conductivity type (Fig. 1, 180a, n-type first semiconductor region, [0027], [0083]) impurity concentration higher than a first conductivity type impurity concentration of the drift region, and which are formed partially in a surface layer portion of the drift region (Fig. 1, 110, drift region may be formed by injecting an n-type impurity at a low concentration, [0051]) as current paths the drift region ([0008], [0110]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to have modified KARINO to incorporate the teachings of PARK such that a semiconductor device comprising: a semiconductor device comprising: resurf regions of the first conductivity type which have a first conductivity type impurity concentration higher than a first conductivity type impurity concentration of the drift region, and which are formed partially in a surface layer portion of the drift region as current paths the drift region. This enables the active area in which the current may flow may be maximized in the power semiconductor device, thereby improving performance of the semiconductor device (PARK, [0110]). Regarding Claim 18, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 17. KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET), wherein the field electrode (Figs. 10A/10B, 80, polysilicon electrode) is constituted of a field resistance film (Fig. 10B, 79, LOCOS oxide film, [0008]) which is electrically connected to the high potential region and the low potential region (Figs. 10A/10B, [0008], [0079]). Regarding Claim 19, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 17. KARINO further teaches the semiconductor device (Fig. 1, 100, high voltage JFET), wherein the field electrode (Fig. 1, 10, polysilicon gate electrode) has a portion which extends in a direction orthogonal to the resurf regions in a plan view (Figs. 1, RESURF (structurally similar to p-floating region, 18, but not functionally similar to p-floating region and its conductivity type); [0008]). Regarding Claim 20, KARINO as modified by PARK teaches the semiconductor device according to Claim 1. PARK teaches a semiconductor device (Fig. 1, power semiconductor device, [0035]) wherein the resurf regions (Fig. 1, 180) each have a long side which extends in the opposing direction (Fig. 1, X direction or -X direction), and a short side (Fig. 1, Z direction or -Z direction) which is shorter than the long side (Fig. 1, Z direction of 180 << X direction of 180) and extends in an intersecting direction that intersects the opposing direction (Fig. 1, X/-X direction perpendicular to Z/-Z direction). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20120043608 A1 – Figure 1 STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE – n-Well (110) defines a drift region for the NLDMOS structure (100) and n-RESURF (104) may be buried layer, RESURF layer; both drift region and RESURF layer have first type conductivity, for example: n-type. US 20130037851 A1 – Figure 1 STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE – n (negative) type base layer and the n type RESURF layer both exhibit first type conductivity, wherein the RESURF layer has higher impurity (n) than the drift region (n-) and thus lower the resistance of the RESURF layer. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SESHA SAIRAMAN SRINIVASAN whose telephone number is (703)756-1389. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30 AM -5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MARLON T FLETCHER can be reached at (571)272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SESHA SAIRAMAN SRINIVASAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /MARLON T FLETCHER/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Dec 18, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 18, 2025
Response Filed
May 27, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 27, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 23, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677435
CO-INTEGRATED RESONANT TUNNELING DIODE AND HIGH-ELECTRON MOBILITY TRANSISTOR
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672433
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666741
IMAGE SENSOR
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12648441
THERMAL DISSIPATION IN POWER IC USING PYROELECTRIC MATERIALS
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12598923
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE COMPRISING AN INTERFACE REGION INCLUDING AGGLOMERATES
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.3%)
3y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 36 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month