Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/799,280

CHARGING COMPARTMENT, CHARGING FRAME COMPRISING SAME, BATTERY SWAP STATION, AND ENERGY STORAGE STATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 02, 2023
Examiner
DIAO, M BAYE
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shanghai Dianba New Energy Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1247 granted / 1424 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1464
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1424 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgement is made of application #17/799,280 filed on 02/02/2023 in which claims 1-20 have been presented for prosecution in a first action on the merits. Response to Amendment Acknowledgement is made of preliminary amendment filed on 02/02/2023 in which claims 5-7,10,15,17 and 19 are currently amended. By this amendment, claims 1-20 are still pending in the application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/14/2022, 08/30/2024 and 04/23/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner and placed of record. Initialed copies are attached herewith. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the underlined limitations of, “A charging compartment, configured such that a battery pack is placed by a battery pack transfer device, wherein the charging compartment comprises: a carrying mechanism, the carrying mechanism carries the battery pack by means of a frame structure, and the carrying mechanism is provided with a frameless space allowing an extension mechanism of the battery pack transfer device to enter when the battery pack transfer device places the battery pack in the carrying mechanism…” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. It is unclear whether or not the battery pack transfer device(not shown anywhere in the drawings) and the carrying mechanism(1) are referring to the same thing. Although the specification page 9, last paragraph states that “Specifically, the extension mechanism of the battery pack transfer device is usually a plug plate arranged on the lower surface of the battery pack 30 …”, however nowhere in the specification or in the drawings that “a battery pack transfer device” and “an extension mechanism” are labeled or shown. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 4 is further objected as being in an improper format. In claim 4, delete the period(.) after the word “guide fork”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 and its dependent claims thereof recite the limitations of, “a charging compartment, configured such that a battery pack is placed by a battery pack transfer device, wherein the charging compartment comprises: a carrying mechanism, the carrying mechanism carries the battery pack by means of a frame structure, and the carrying mechanism is provided with a frameless space allowing an extension mechanism of the battery pack transfer device to enter when the battery pack transfer device places the battery pack in the carrying mechanism…”. It is unclear as to whether or not the battery pack transfer device and the carrying mechanism are referring to the same thing and it is also unclear what element(s) is(are) applicants referring to for the limitations of, “extension mechanism”. Although the specification page 9, last paragraph states that “Specifically, the extension mechanism of the battery pack transfer device is usually a plug plate arranged on the lower surface of the battery pack 30…”, however nowhere in the specification or in the drawings that “battery pack transfer device” is labeled. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 2-20 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 1 and therefore they inherit the same deficiencies and are also rejected for the same reasons. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and subjected to showing a support for the underlined limitations mentioned supra. The prior art of record does not teach neither reasonably suggest, among other patentable features, “…wherein the charging compartment comprises: a carrying mechanism, the carrying mechanism carries the battery pack by means of a frame structure, and the carrying mechanism is provided with a frameless space allowing an extension mechanism of the battery pack transfer device(subjected to showing support for the underlined limitations mentioned previously) to enter when the battery pack transfer device places the battery pack in the carrying mechanism; and an electric connection mechanism, the electric connection mechanism is arranged at the carrying mechanism, and the electric connection mechanism is configured to be electrically connected to the battery pack after the battery pack is placed in the carrying mechanism”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to M'BAYE DIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-6127. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 9:00AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DREW A DUNN can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. M'BAYE DIAO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2859 /M BAYE DIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 November 13, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600265
POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, ELECTRIC VEHICLE PROVIDED WITH POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601790
Battery Parameter Estimation Apparatus and Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600258
MANAGEMENT OF CHARGING REQUESTS TO AVOID SECURITY ISSUES AND SERVICING DELAYS ACROSS CHARGING STATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594854
BATTERY CONTROL SYSTEM, BATTERY CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589665
PEER-TO-PEER DC FAST CHARGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1424 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month