Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Shanghai Dianba New Energy Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Shanghai Dianba New Energy Technology Co. Ltd. has 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 4 distinct examiners, meaning each case is being reviewed by a different individual. These examiners are spread across 2 distinct art units.

WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. The involvement of 4 distinct examiners for the total actions shows a complete lack of examiner concentration in the current workload.

With 2 distinct art units involved, the 4 pending office actions are somewhat clustered technically. However, practitioners must still manage separate examiner relationships. Since WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS and the other examiners each have a single pending action, the prosecution is evenly distributed across the personnel. This distribution requires a strategy that addresses the specific tendencies of each examiner while maintaining consistency within the art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
2
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS 1 77.6% +26.5%
TRAIL, ALLYSON NEEL 1 88.4% +7.1%
KANDAS, NICHOLAS R 1 84.6% +20.9%
GRANT, ROBERT J 1 76.2% +17.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18270218 BATTERY SWAPPING STATION TRAIL, ALLYSON NEEL —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18575825 ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY SWAPPING ASSEMBLY AND BATTERY SWAPPING STATION KANDAS, NICHOLAS R 23d
18853418 UNLOCKING ASSEMBLY WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17916293 BATTERY SWAPPING METHOD GRANT, ROBERT J 2d overdue
18575825 ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY SWAPPING ASSEMBLY AND BATTERY SWAPPING STATION KANDAS, NICHOLAS R 23d
18853418 UNLOCKING ASSEMBLY WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3613 1
2859 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18853418 UNLOCKING ASSEMBLY WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 23, 2024
18270218 BATTERY SWAPPING STATION TRAIL, ALLYSON NEEL — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2024
18575825 ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY SWAPPING ASSEMBLY AND BATTERY SWAPPING STATION KANDAS, NICHOLAS R 3613 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 23d Pending Dec 30, 2023
17916293 BATTERY SWAPPING METHOD GRANT, ROBERT J 2859 §103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Apr 06, 2023

Managing Shanghai Dianba New Energy Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month