Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/801,632

CHARGING STATION FOR CHARGING ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 23, 2022
Examiner
PARIHAR, SUCHIN
Art Unit
2851
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Eloaded GmbH
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1001 granted / 1141 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1176
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§103
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§102
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1141 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. This Non-Final office action is in response to application 17/801,632, Applicant’s amendment filed on 11/07/2025. 3. Claims 16 and 20 are currently amended by Applicant. Claims 31-32 are presented as new by Applicant. Claims 1-15, 19, 21, and 24-25 are cancelled by Applicant. Claims 16-18, 20, 22-23 and 26-32 are currently pending in this application. Response to Arguments 4. Applicant’s arguments and claim amendments have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Mallon. As a result, Applicant’s arguments and claim amendments filed 11/07/2025 have are now moot because the new ground of rejection relies on reference Mallon in a new 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection, and Mallon was not cited in the prior rejection of record. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claim(s) 16-18, 20, 22-23 and 28-32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Mallon, IV et al. (US PG Pub No. 2013/0257373). 7. With respect to claim 16, Mallon teaches: charging station for charging electric vehicles (charging station for electric vehicles, para 4, 8, 15), comprising an electric charging cable (charging cable secured to charging cable arm, Abstract, para 4-6, 33-35) and a spring element (see spring element, para 43); which is fixed at one end (charging cable with fixed portion 122 attached to elongated arm, para 39; see spring element on/at elongated arm with fixed position on one side, para 42-45) and which is resiliently movable at another end (see expanded/movable side of spring, para 43), wherein the spring element at least partially supports the electric charging cable (see attachment of spring element and elongated arm to support attached charging cable, para 43), and wherein the spring element is arranged at its one end on a technical unit (see portion of spring element 134 attached to technical unit 154, Fig 2c, para 43-45), the technical unit is fixed under a bottom surface or behind a wall surface (see technical unit or charging apparatus 100/102 shown in Fig 1A, which attaches to the ground, para 6, 8, 30-35), the charging station comprises a status display (status display in Fig 5A at 104/106, station status on display, Figs 5A-5D, para 49), and the display is arranged at the other end of the spring element (see display 104/106 at one end of spring shown in Fig 4C, para 48-52). 8. With respect to claim 17, Mallon teaches: charging station according to claim 16, wherein the spring element partially surrounds the electrical charging cable (see cable handling conduit shown in Fig 3B which clearly has cable coming out of conduit which contains spring, Fig 3B, para 48-52). 9. With respect to claim 18, Mallon teaches: Charging station according to claim 16, wherein the spring member supports the electrical charging cable in a relaxed state such that the electrical charging cable does not contact a bottom surface (see Fig 3B, where spring and cable conduit system support cable so cable does not touch ground, distance 156b, para 146). 10. With respect to claim 20, Mallon teaches: Charging station according to claim 19, wherein the technical unit comprises at least one of the following components: cooling device, controller, DC-DC converter, contactor and relay (see electrical equipment suitable for transforming voltage and current to achieve suitable voltage and current to charge EV 20, para 48). 11. With respect to claim 22, Mallon teaches: Charging station according to claim 16, wherein the charging station comprises a direct current charging station, which is in particular connected to a direct current line (see power supply and electrical equipment suitable for transforming voltage and current to achieve suitable voltage and current to charge EV 20, para 48). 12. With respect to claim 23, Mallon teaches: Charging station according to claim 16, wherein the electrical charging cable comprises a connector, and the charging station comprises a connector mounting for removably holding the connector (see charging station and connector, Abstract). 13. With respect to claim 28, Mallon teaches: Charging station according to claim 16, wherein the spring element comprises a coil spring (see coil spring, para 40-45). 14. With respect to claim 29, Mallon teaches: Charging station according to claim 16, wherein the spring element has at least two different pitches (see pitch at spring based on movement and expansion of spring, Fig 2C-2D, para 40-45). 15. With respect to claim 30, Mallon teaches: Charging station according to claim 16, wherein the spring element is surrounded by a flexible protective sleeve (see flexible/bendable conduit, para 4-5, 32). 16. With respect to claim 31, Mallon teaches: the technical unit is fixed under a bottom surface (see power supply coming from ground below charging unit, Fig 2-3C; see power supply and electrical equipment suitable for transforming voltage and current to achieve suitable voltage and current to charge EV 20, para 48). 17. With respect to claim 32, Mallon teaches: the technical unit is fixed behind a wall surface (see wall-unit, Fig 8A-8B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 18. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 19. Claim(s) 26-27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mallon, IV et al. (US PG Pub No. 2013/0257373) in view of Bianco et al. (US PG Pub No. 2017/0129351). 20. With respect to claim 26, Mallon appears to be silent regarding: Charging station according to claim 16, wherein the charging station comprises a wireless communication means. However, Bianco teaches: Charging station according to claim 16, wherein the charging station comprises a wireless communication means (Fig 35D, wireless communication, payment station, RFID card reader, wireless network data transmission, para 67). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time of the invention to have incorporated Bianco’s wireless communications feature into the invention of Mallon for at least the following reason(s): as evidenced by Bianco, it is well known in the art that charging stations like those disclosed in both Mallon and Bianco have wireless communications features that enable vehicles and users to receive information and status remotely via their vehicle management system or on a user’s mobile device, and for mobile payment processing and authorization. 21. With respect to claim 27, while Mallon is silent regarding the limitations recited in claim 27, Bianco teaches: Charging station according to claim 26, wherein the wireless communication means is arranged at the other end of the spring element (see wireless communication element in control box which is located opposite the cable and spring mechanisms, see Fig 35D, and Fig 14-15 for spring functions within cable management box and cable reel 301 of Fig 14-15). (For motivation to combine Mallon and Bianco, please see rejection of claim 26). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUCHIN PARIHAR whose telephone number is (703)756-1970. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang can be reached on 571-272-7483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUCHIN PARIHAR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2022
Application Filed
May 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 07, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603465
AUTOMOTIVE DC/AC POWER INVERTER AND POWER OUTLET WITH PLUG-DETECT MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596945
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPILING BARE QUANTUM-LOGIC CIRCUITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594849
OVERHEAD CHARGING APPARATUS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591727
LANE REPAIR AND LANE REVERSAL IMPLEMENTATION FOR DIE-TO-DIE (D2D) INTERCONNECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591729
ALIGNMENT OF MACROS BASED ON ANCHOR LOCATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1141 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month