Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/804,810

CABLE INTEGRATED SOLAR INVERTER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 31, 2022
Priority
Dec 18, 2015 — provisional 62/269,754 +2 more
Examiner
LY, XUAN
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Southwire Company, LLC
OA Round
7 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
8-9
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
459 granted / 539 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
560
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
92.1%
+52.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§112
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 539 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s response filed on 01/22/2026 has been entered and considered. Upon entering claims 1-21 were pending; and claims 1-2, 9-11, 13-15, and 20-21 have been amended. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 01/22/2026 have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection as further noted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-8, 10, and 20-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Rooij et al. (US 2009/0296434) in view of LV Guozhong et al. (CN103675569). Regarding claim 1, De Rooij teaches A method of converting direct current (DC) power from a plurality of photovoltaic modules (fig. 5@ 104, 106) into alternating current (AC) power (see Abstarct, par. [0043-0047] and claim 1), the method comprising: receiving one or more DC power signals at a plurality of photovoltaic modules (104, 106); converting, via a plurality of power converters connected in series (see figure 5: converters connected to PV array 104, 106), the one or more DC power signals into a rectified sine wave signal (see figure 5: sine wave signal 120, 122), wherein each of the plurality converters comprises a buck converter (see par. [0044-0045]); and converting, via an unfolding bridge (fig. 5@ unfolding circuit 102) within a grid interface unit, the rectified sine wave signal to an AC signal for supply to a power grid (see Abstract; par. [0043], [0047] and claim 1: “The PV inverter system increases the level of the voltage sourcing each buck converter when a corresponding DC power source voltage is lower than the instantaneous voltage of a utility grid connected to the PV inverter system”), the grid interface unit (102) being electrically connected to the plurality of power converters and to the power grid (see figure 5 and claim 1); wherein each photovoltaic module of the plurality of photovoltaic modules (104, 106) is configured for being electrically connected to a respective power converter of the plurality of power converters (see figure 5), and wherein the plurality of photovoltaic modules (104, 106) are not connected to one another in series (see figure 5: PV arrays 104 and 106 are not connected in series). However, De Rooij does not explicitly teach a set of connector pairs comprising at least a connector pair corresponding to a fault detection line or a synchronization line. LV Guozhong teaches a set of connector pairs comprising at least a connector pair corresponding to a fault detection line or a synchronization line (see figure 3, Abstract and par. [0041-0042]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified De Rooij with the teachings of LV Guozhong by having a set of connector pairs comprising at least a connector pair corresponding to a fault detection line or a synchronization line in order to provides signal integrity, reliable bidirectional communication, mechanical stability, flexibility, easier maintenance, compatibility and maintaining efficient, high-speed, and scalable networks. Regarding claim 2, the combination teaches wherein each of the plurality of power converters is configured for being electrically connected to a respective photovoltaic module of the plurality of photovoltaic modules (104, 106), (see figure 5; De Rooij). Regarding claim 3, the combination teaches wherein the unfolding bridge (102) comprises circuitry configured to function as an H-bridge (fig. 5@ unfolding circuit 102 includes switching devices 112, 114, 116, 118; De Rooij). Regarding claim 4, the combination teaches wherein converting the rectified sine wave signal to the AC signal comprises reversing polarity of the rectified sine wave signal on alternate pulses to an AC compatible signal (see figure 5 and par. [0043] “an output unfolding circuit 102 that functions solely to unfold a rectified current waveform produced by summing the rectified currents generated via a plurality of power sources including a first PV array 104, a second PV array 106; De Rooij). Regarding claim 5, the combination teaches wherein the rectified sine wave signal comprises a half-sine wave (see figure 5: half-sine wave 120, 122; De Rooij). Regarding claim 6, the combination teaches wherein the half-sine wave comprises a half-wave of one of at least a sinusoidal wave including a sine wave (see figure 5: sine wave 120, 122; De Rooij). Regarding claim 7, the combination teaches further comprising producing, via each of the plurality of power converters, a half-sine wave signal (see figure 5; De Rooij). Regarding claim 8, the combination teaches further comprising: producing each respective half-sine wave signal in synchronization with each of the other of the plurality of power converters and the grid interface unit; and adding each of the respective half-sine wave signals in the grid interface unit to form the rectified sine wave signal of a combined output voltage from the plurality of power converters (see figure 5 and par. [0043]; “PV inverter topology 100 includes an output unfolding circuit 102 that functions solely to unfold a rectified current waveform produced by summing the rectified currents generated via a plurality of power sources including a first PV array 104, a second PV array 106”; De Rooij). Regarding claim 10, the combination teaches wherein the plurality of power converters are each configured to produce an individual part of the rectified sine wave signal (120, 122), such that when combined the individual parts form a full rectified sine wave signal (see par. [0043] and claim 1; “a current unfolding circuit comprising switching devices configured to switch synchronously with the utility grid so as to construct an AC current in response to the full wave rectified sine wave current”; De Rooij). Regarding claim 20, the combination teaches further comprising receiving, via the grid interface unit (102), the rectified sine wave signal from the plurality of power converters (see figure 5 and par. [0043]; De Rooij). Regarding claim 21, the combination teaches wherein the grid interface unit (102) is configured to be electrically connected to the plurality of power converters in series (see figure 5; De Rooij). Claims 9, 12, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Rooij et al. (US 2009/0296434) in view of LV Guozhong et al. (CN103675569) and further in view of Ilic et al. (US 2020/0144933). Regarding claim 9, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach further comprising: synchronizing, via the grid interface unit, the plurality of power converters; and communicating with the plurality of power converters through a combined synchronization and communication line in a trunk cable. Ilic teaches further comprising: synchronizing, via the grid interface unit (410), the plurality of power converters (420); and communicating with the plurality of power converters (410) through a combined synchronization and communication line in a trunk cable (see figures 1 and 4 and par. [0027] and [0037], interconnection cables). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified De Rooij and LV Guozhong with the teachings of Ilic by having synchronizing, via the grid interface unit, the plurality of power converters; and communicating with the plurality of power converters through a combined synchronization and communication line in a trunk cable in order to reduces hardware, and improves overall efficiency, reliability, and stability. Regarding claim 12, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach wherein the grid interface unit comprises a fault detection system, a monitoring system, a synchronization system, and a communication system. Ilic teaches the grid interface unit comprises a fault detection system, a monitoring system, a synchronization system, and a communication system (see par. [0006-0008]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified De Rooij and LV Guozhong with the teachings of Ilic by having the grid interface unit comprises a fault detection system, a monitoring system, a synchronization system, and a communication system in order to enhance the grid's overall reliability, efficiency, and stability. Regarding claim 14, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach wherein the plurality of power converters and the grid interface unit are connected by a trunk cable. Ilic teaches the plurality of power converters (420) and the grid interface unit (410) are connected by a trunk cable (see figures 1 and 4 and par. [0027] and [0037], interconnection cables). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified De Rooij and LV Guozhong with the teachings of Ilic by having the plurality of power converters and the grid interface unit are connected by a trunk cable in order to minimizes the number of potential failure points and provides better protection against environmental hazards like moisture, dust, or physical damage. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Rooij et al. (US 2009/0296434) in view of LV Guozhong et al. (CN103675569) and further in view of Stauth et al. (US 2010/0289337). Regarding claim 11, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach further comprising synchronizing the plurality of power converters by a combined synchronization and communication signal produced by the grid interface unit, wherein the combined signal includes communication bits. Stauth teaches synchronizing the plurality of power converters by a combined synchronization and communication signal produced by the grid interface unit, wherein the combined signal includes communication bits, (see figs. 16-20; and par. [0119-0122]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Stauth into the method of De Rooij and LV Guozhong in order to reduce noise and can be saved and retrieved the information signals. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Rooij et al. (US 2009/0296434) in view of LV Guozhong et al. (CN103675569) and further in view of Ledenev et al. (US 2011/0210611). Regarding claim 13, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach further comprising preventing electrical signals from propagating towards the plurality of power converters and the plurality of photovoltaic modules via a blocking diode connected in series with the plurality of power converters. Ledenev teaches preventing electrical signals from propagating towards the plurality of power converters and the plurality of photovoltaic modules via a blocking diode (fig. 1: 12) connected in series with the plurality of power converters (10), (see fig. 1 and par. [0021]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Ledenev into the method of De Rooij and LV Guozhong in order to prevent the reverse current flow may preclude voltages that would otherwise damage reverse current sensitive devices such as switches that may form part of a voltage limiting DC to DC converter. Claims 15-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over De Rooij et al. (US 2009/0296434) in view of LV Guozhong et al. (CN103675569), in view of Ilic et al. (US 2020/0144933) and further in view of Croft et al. (US 2011/0061705). Regarding claim 15, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach wherein the plurality of power converters are embedded in the trunk cable. Groft teaches the plurality of power converters are embedded in the trunk cable, (see figs. 1, 4, 6; and par. [0054]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Croft into the method of De Rooij, LV Guozhong and Ilic in order to provide more convenient to technician for easily to install or remove the power converter. Regarding claim 16, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach wherein each of the plurality of power converters comprises a weather proof cartridge and a housing attached to the trunk cable, the weather proof cartridge configured for removable insertion into the housing. Croft discloses the method, wherein each of the plurality of power converter comprises a weather proof cartridge and a housing attached to the trunk cable, the weather proof cartridge configured for removable insertion into the housing, (see figs. 2a-c, 3a-c; par. [0035], (insert 330 provides a hermetic seal to protect module and J-box components and for safety. Placing the insert in this operating position ensures that leads are not exposed to the environment at housing interface 375), [0039], (the movable or fixed part. As described above, in certain embodiments, diodes and the like are contained within the movable part for easy replacement. As described further below, in certain embodiments, the movable part may contain additional elements, including but not limited, to inverters, DC/DC converters and the like); [0059], (the insert may provide a hermetic seal)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Croft into the method of De Rooij, LV Guozhong and Ilic in order to provide more convenient to technician for easily to install or remove the power converter. Regarding claim 17, the combination teaches wherein each power converter housing is embedded in the trunk cable, (see figs. 1, 4; par. [0045]; Croft). Regarding claim 18, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach one or more weatherproof housings for housing one or more of the plurality of power converters. Croft teaches one or more weatherproof housings for housing one or more of the plurality of power converters (see figs 1-4; par. [0035] and [0039]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Croft into the method of De Rooij, LV Guozhong and Ilic in order to protect the power converters. Regarding claim 19, the combination teaches the method above, but does not explicitly teach wherein the grid interface unit is located remotely from the plurality of power converters. Croft teaches wherein the grid interface unit (440) is located remotely from the plurality of power converters (430), (see figure 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Croft into the method of De Rooij, LV Guozhong and Ilic in order to protect the power converters. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XUAN LY whose telephone number is (571)272-9885. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at 571-272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XUAN LY/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /REXFORD N BARNIE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 9 earlier events
Oct 24, 2024
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 24, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 23, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683397
Method for Operating a Network Management System for a Local Energy Network Depending on a Storage Strategy of an Energy Store
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671312
CAPACITOR VOLTAGE BALANCING CONTROL TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-LEVEL MULTI-CHANNEL DRIVES
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671258
PROTECTION CIRCUIT AND CHARGING EQUIPMENT
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658710
BASE STATION POWER CONVERTER SUITABLE FOR SINGLE-PHASE POWER SOURCES
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12647038
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 539 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month