Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/806,748

ELECTRONIC COMPONENT MODULE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 14, 2022
Examiner
FREY, KIMBERLY NEWMAN
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
48%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
10 granted / 15 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -19% lift
Without
With
+-19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
68
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
54.0%
+14.0% vs TC avg
§102
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 15 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 4, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being anticipated by Nomura et al. ( US 2020/0137893 A1 ( continuation of PCT/JP2018/024497); hereinafter Nomura) in view of Otsubo; US 2019/0273312 A1; 09/2019 Claim 1: Nomura discloses in Fig. 1, an electronic component module ( Fig. 1 -high frequency module #1c ) comprising: a substrate ( Fig. 1 wiring board #2) including a first main surface ( Fig. 1 #2a) and a second main surface ( Fig. 1 #2b), the first main surface being a mounting side ( Fig. 1 #2a is where components #3a and #4 are mounted) ; a first electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3a ) and a second electronic component ( Fig. 1 #4 ) each mounted on the first main surface ( Fig. 1 #2a ); a first conductive member ( Fig. 1 mounting electrodes #7 ) mounted on the first main surface ( Fig. 1 #2a ) and disposed between the first electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3a ) and the second electronic component ( Fig. 1 #4 ); a first insulating resin ( Fig. 1 sealing resin layer #5 ) covering a side ([0040] sealing resin layer #5 laminated on the upper surface #2a of the wiring board #2 ) of the first main surface ( Fig. 1 #2a ); and a first shield film ( Fig. 1 shield film #6 ) provided on one surface of the first insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #5 ), the one surface ( Fig. 1 top surface #5a ) being opposite to a surface ( Fig. 1 bottom surface #5b) of the first insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #5) facing the first main surface of the substrate ( Fig. 1 #2a) wherein: the first insulating resin (Fig. 1 #5) includes a first depression ( Fig. 1 a recess #10 ) exposing the first conductive member (#4, and #7) ( Fig. 1 #7 is connected to #4 which is exposed, [0044] discloses #4 as a cuboid copper ) from the first insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #5 ) at a portion overlapping with the first conductive member ( Fig. 1 #7 ); the first shield film ( Fig. 1 #6 ) is provided in the first depression ( [0047] The shield film #6 also covers the wall surfaces #10a of the recess #10 ) of the first insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #5 ) and is connected ( Fig. 1 shows #6 wraps around the side to connect with #8 and #9 which are connected to #7) to the first conductive member ( Fig. 1 #7, #4); the first shield film ( Fig. 1 #6 ) and the ground terminal conductor ( Fig. 1 #8) are connected by a solder bump ( [0043] The components 3a to 3d are mounted on the wiring board 2 by using a typical surface mount technology, such as soldering. [0044] the shield component 4 can have the same mountability as those of the other components 3a to 3d ) including a portion to be filled in the opening ( Fig. 1 shows #4 is in the opening of the recess ) ); the first electronic component is an electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3a ) that easily generates noise ( [0083] The present disclosure can be applied to various types of high frequency modules that include a sealing resin layer for covering components mounted on a wiring board, a shield for covering the surface of the sealing resin layer, and a shield for preventing noise interference between components ) ; the second electronic component ( Fig. 1 #4 ) is different ( as shown in Fig. 1 ) from the first electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3a ); and the first conductive member ( Fig. 1 #7 ) is different from the first electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3a ) and the second electronic component ( Fig. 1 #4 ). Nomura does not appear to disclose in Fig. 1, a ground terminal conductor is mounted on the first main surface; the first shield film includes an opening overlapping with a portion of the ground terminal conductor. However, Otsubo teaches in Fig. 5A a ground terminal conductor ( Fig. 5A via conductor #90 ) is mounted ( as shown in Fig. 5A ) on the first main surface ( Fig. 5A #2 ); a first shield film ( Fig. 5 #11b and 6 ) includes an opening (between #11b and #6) ( [0047] Each via conductor #90 may be formed by, for example forming a via hole extending through in a thickness direction of the second sealing resin layer #4b by laser beam machining such that a surface layer electrode #7c is exposed and then filling the via hole with electrically conductive paste ) overlapping with a portion of the ground terminal conductor ( Fig. 5A #90 ) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Otsubo with Nomura to implement a ground terminal conductor is mounted on the first main surface; the first shield film includes an opening overlapping with a portion of the ground terminal conductor because for the shield to operate effectively in blocking EMI it needs to be properly grounded. Claim 2: Nomura and Otsubo disclose the electronic component module according to claim 1 (as discussed above). Nomura teaches the first shield film ( Fig. 1 #6 ) overlaps with at least one of the first electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3a ) and the second electronic component ( Fig. 1 # ) in a plan view ( Fig. 2 is a plan view of Fig. 1 showing #6 overlaps the region covered by #3a and #4). Claim 4: Nomura and Otsubo disclose the electronic component module according to claim 1 ( as discussed above ). Nomura teaches the first shield film ( Fig. 1 #6 ) is provided in the first depression ( [0047] The shield film #6 also covers the wall surfaces #10a of the recess #10 ) provided in the one surface ( Fig. 1 #5a ) of the first insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #5). Claim 10: Nomura and Otsubo disclose the electronic component module according to claim 1 ( as discussed above). Nomura does not appear to disclose the opening formed at a portion of the first shield film overlaps with the center of the ground terminal conductor. However, Otsubo teaches the opening (between #11b and #6) ( [0047] Each via conductor #90 may be formed by, for example forming a via hole extending through in a thickness direction of the second sealing resin layer #4b by laser beam machining such that a surface layer electrode #7c is exposed and then filling the via hole with electrically conductive paste) formed at a portion of the first shield film ( Fig. 5 #11b ) overlaps with the center ( Fig. 5 #11b overlaps with the side of #90 which covers the center of the terminal ) of the ground terminal conductor ( [0047] the internal wiring electrode #12b is grounded ) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Otsubo with Nomura to implement the opening formed at a portion of the first shield film overlaps with the center of the ground terminal conductor because for the shield to operate effectively in blocking EMI it needs to be properly grounded. Claims 3, 5, 6, and 8 are rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nomura et al.; US 2020/0137893 A1; 04/2020 in view of Otsubo; US 2019/0273312 A1; 09/2019 Claim 3: Nomura discloses the electronic component module according to claim 1 ( as discussed above). Nomura does not appear to disclose an external connection terminal conductor mounted on the first main surface of the substrate, wherein the external connection terminal conductor is exposed from the first insulating resin and spaced apart from the first shield film. However, Otsubo teaches an external connection terminal conductor ( Fig. 1 #8) mounted ( as shown in Fig. 1 ) on the first main surface ( Fig. 1 #2b – as shown in the drawings of the application the bottom surface) of the substrate ( Fig. 1 #2), wherein the external connection terminal conductor ( Fig. 1 #8) is exposed from the first insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #4b – bottom insulating resin as shown in the application drawings) and spaced apart from the first shield film ( Fig. 1 #6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Otsubo with Nomura to implement an external connection terminal conductor mounted on the first main surface of the substrate, wherein the external connection terminal conductor is exposed from the first insulating resin and spaced apart from the first shield film because this enabled soldering or bonding to the device through the terminal conductor and establishes proper electrical contact. Claim 5: Nomura discloses the electronic component module according to claim 1 (as discussed above). Nomura does not appear to disclose a plurality of external connection terminal conductors disposed on the first main surface of the substrate, wherein, in a plan view of the substrate, the first shield film is provided inside the plurality of external connection terminal conductors. However, Otsubo teaches a plurality of external connection terminal conductors ( Fig. 2. #8 ) disposed on the first main surface ( Fig. 1 #2b – as shown in the application drawings on the bottom of the substrate not the top ) of the substrate ( Fig. 1 #2), wherein, in a plan view of the substrate (Fig. 2), the first shield film ( Fig. 2 #6) is provided inside the plurality of external connection terminal conductors ( Fig. 1 #8) . It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Otsubo with Nomura to implement a plurality of external connection terminal conductors disposed on the first main surface of the substrate, wherein, in a plan view of the substrate, the first shield film is provided inside the plurality of external connection terminal conductors because this approach of having the connections inside the shield provides for Electromagnetic Interference shielding. Claim 6: Nomura discloses the electronic component module according to claim 1 ( as discussed above). Nomura does not appear to disclose another electronic component mounted on the second main surface of the substrate ; a second insulating resin covering a side of the second main surface ; and a second shield film covering an outer surface of the second insulating resin , a side surface of the substrate , and a side surface of the first insulating resin. However, Otsubo teaches another electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3b1) mounted on the second main surface ( Fig. 1 #20b ) of the substrate ( Fig. 1 #2); a second insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #4b) covering a side of the second main surface ( Fig. 1 #20b); and a second shield film ( [0008] The shield member provided on the other one of the main surfaces is disposed between the predetermined second component and the other second component ) covering an outer surface of the second insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #4b), a side surface of the substrate ( Fig. 1 #20c), and a side surface of the first insulating resin ( Fig. 1 #4a3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Otsubo with Nomura to implement another electronic component mounted on the second main surface of the substrate; a second insulating resin covering a side of the second main surface; and a second shield film covering an outer surface of the second insulating resin, a side surface of the substrate, and a side surface of the first insulating resin because this approach improves component density, and can reduce electromagnetic interference. Claim 8: Nomura discloses the electronic component module according to claim 6 ( as discussed above). Nomura does not appear to disclose the second shield film and the first shield film are connected to each other. However, Otsubo teaches the second shield film ( [0041] The shield film #6 and the shield electrodes #11a, #11b also provide a sufficient shielding effect for the plurality of components #3b1 to #3b3 mounted on the bottom surface #20b of the multilayer circuit board #2 ) and the first shield film ( Fig. 1 #6 ) are connected to each other ( Fig. 1. #6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Otsubo with Nomura to implement the second shield film and the first shield film are connected to each other because connecting them improves electromagnetic interference shielding. Claim 7 is rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nomura et al.; US 2020/0137893 A1; 04/2020 in view of Otsubo; US 2019/0273312 A1; 09/2019 as applied to claim 6 above, and further in view of Kabasawa et al.; US 2016/0155927 A1; 03/2014; Claim 7: Nomura and Otsubo disclose the electronic component module according to claim 6 ( as discussed above). Otsubo discloses the other electronic component mounted on the second main surface ( Fig. 1 #20b) includes a third electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3b2) and a fourth electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3b3), the third electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3b2) and the fourth electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3b3) being spaced apart from each other ( Fig. 1 #3b2 and #3b3 are spaced apart from each other); a second conductive member ( Fig. 1 #9 ) is disposed between the third electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3b2 ) and the fourth electronic component ( Fig. #3b3 ) on the second main surface ( Fig. 1 #20b ) of the substrate ( Fig. 1 #2 ); Neither Nomura nor Otsubo appear to disclose the second insulating resin includes a second depression exposing the second conductive member from the second insulating resin at a portion overlapping with the second conductive member; and the second shield film is provided in the second depression of the second insulating resin and is connected to the second conductive member. However, Kabasawa teaches the second insulating resin ( Fig. 19 #220a ) includes a second depression ( Fig. 19 #230a ) exposing the second conductive member ( Fig. 18 #225a ) from the second insulating resin ( Fig. 19 #220a ) at a portion overlapping with the second conductive member ( Fig. 18 #225a ); and the second shield film ( Fig. 19 #247a ) is provided in the second depression ( Fig. 19 #230a ) of the second insulating resin ( Fig. 19 #220a) and is connected to the second conductive member ( Fig. 18 #225a ). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Kabasawa with Otsubo and Nomura to implement the second insulating resin includes a second depression exposing the second conductive member from the second insulating resin at a portion overlapping with the second conductive member; and the second shield film is provided in the second depression of the second insulating resin and is connected to the second conductive member because direct contact with the conducting member is crucial for grounding the shield and ensuring optimal EMI suppression. Response to Amendment/Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 5 of the remarks, filed 11/12/2025, with respect to Drawings have been fully considered and are persuasive. The objection of 08/26/25 has been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 11/12/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Nomura discloses “a first conductive member ( Fig. 1 mounting electrodes #7 ) mounted on the first main surface ( Fig. 1 #2a )” and “the first conductive member ( Fig. 1 #7 ) is different from the first electronic component ( Fig. 1 #3a ) and the second electronic component ( Fig. 1 #4 ) “. A shield component is a specific type of electronic component used to protect other components in the module. As shown in Fig. 1 #7 is shown as a different region. The argument that a component positioned between the component 3a and the shield component 4, is not mentioned in claim 1. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY N FREY whose telephone number is (571)272-5068. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon Fletcher can be reached at (571)272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.N.F./Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /MARLON T FLETCHER/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 12, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12578441
SENSING DEVICE AND DISTANCE MEASURING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575091
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND PROCESSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12538685
PIXEL ARRANGEMENT STRUCTURE, DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY APPARATUS AND MASK GROUP
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12525545
HBI DIE FIDUCIAL ARCHITECTURE WITH CANTILEVER FIDUCIALS FOR SMALLER DIE SIZE AND BETTER YIELDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 4 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
48%
With Interview (-19.2%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 15 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month