Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/834,952

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 08, 2022
Examiner
ISAAC, STANETTA D
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Asustek Computer Inc.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
48%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
811 granted / 948 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -38% lift
Without
With
+-37.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
1005
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 948 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/02/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, and 3-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang (US PGPub 2021/0392216, hereinafter referred to as “Huang”) in view of Li et al. (US PGPub 20220271263, hereinafter referred to as “Li”). Huang discloses the semiconductor device as substantially as claimed. See figures 1-7 and corresponding text, where Huang shows, in claim 1, an electronic device, comprising: a display panel, comprising (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) a display surface (101), a back surface opposite to the display surface, and a side surface connecting the display surface and the back surface; an infrared light source (106), disposed adjacent to the side surface of the display panel, wherein the display panel comprises an overlapping region in which the infrared light source overlaps with the side surface as viewed from a side view; an infrared cutoff layer (107), attached to the side surface and the back surface of the display panel, and covering at least the overlapping region and an extension region in which the overlapping region extends respectively in a transverse direction and toward the back surface by a preset distance, wherein the infrared cutoff layer comprises a black adhesive tape or an infrared cutoff filter (figures 1-3; [0020-0028],infrared cutoff filter). However, Huang fails to show, in claim 1, an infrared cutoff layer, directly attached to the side surface and the back surface of the display panel, and covering at least the overlapping region and an extension region; filter; and a touch panel, disposed above the display panel and the infrared light source, wherein the infrared cutoff layer extends to be attached to a lower surface of the touch panel, and covers at least the lower surface located above a gap between the display panel and the infrared light source. Li teaches, in claim 1, a similar device that includes forming a light-shielding structure (3) that includes a black tape (33) directly attached to the side and back surface of the display panel (1) (figure 2; [0051]) and a touch panel (5) ([0044]). In addition, Li provides the advantages of having a light-shielding effect ([0065]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art “before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate and a touch panel, disposed above the display panel and the infrared light source, wherein the infrared cutoff layer extends to be attached to a lower surface of the touch panel, and covers at least the lower surface located above a gap between the display panel and the infrared light source, in the device of Huang according to the teachings of Li, with the motivation of having a light-shielding effect. Huang in view of Li, shows, in claim 3, wherein the transmittance of the infrared cutoff layer to infrared light is less than or equal to 15%. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) Huang in view of Li, shows, in claim 4, wherein the preset distance is in a range of 5 millimeters (mm) to 15 mm. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) Huang in view of Li, shows, in claim 5, wherein the display panel comprises an organic electroluminescence display panel. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) Huang in view of Li, shows, in claim 6, further comprising a touch panel, disposed above the display panel and the infrared light source, wherein the infrared cutoff layer extends to be attached to a lower surface of the touch panel, and covers at least the lower surface located above a gap between the display panel and the infrared light source. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) Huang in view of Li, shows, in claim 7, wherein the infrared cutoff layer comprises a notch corresponding to the infrared light source, and the notch surrounds at least a part of the infrared light source. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) Huang in view of Li, shows, in claim 8, further comprising a light blocking structure, disposed between the display panel and the infrared light source. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) Huang in view of Li, shows, in claim 9, further comprising a frame, comprising a display opening and a light source opening respectively exposing and enclosing the display panel and the infrared light source. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) Huang in view of Li, shows, in claim 10, wherein the display panel further comprises a metal foil layer located on the back surface of the display panel, and the infrared cutoff layer covers the metal foil layer. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) Huang shows, in claim 11, an electronic device, comprising: a display panel, comprising a display surface (101), a back surface opposite to the display surface, a metal foil layer disposed on the back surface and a side surface connecting the display surface and the back surface; (figures 1-3; [0020-0023]) an infrared light source (106), disposed adjacent to the side surface of the display panel, wherein the display panel comprises an overlapping region in which the infrared light source overlaps with the side surface as viewed from a side view; (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) an infrared cutoff layer (107), attached to the side surface and the back surface of the display panel, and covering at least the overlapping region and an extension region in which the overlapping region extends respectively in a transverse direction and toward the back surface by a preset distance, wherein the infrared cutoff layer covers the metal foil layer. (figures 1-3; [0020-0028]) However, Huang fails to show, in claim 1, directly attached to the side surface and the back surface of the display panel, and covering at least the overlapping region and an extension region in which the overlapping region extends respectively in a transverse direction and toward the back surface by a preset distance, wherein the infrared cutoff layer covers the metal foil layer. Li teaches, in claim 11, a similar device that includes forming a light-shielding structure (3) that includes a black tape (33) directly attached to the side and back surface of the display panel (1) (figure 2; [0051]). In addition, Li provides the advantages of having a light-shielding effect ([0065]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art “before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate directly attached to the side surface and the back surface of the display panel, and covering at least the overlapping region and an extension region in which the overlapping region extends respectively in a transverse direction and toward the back surface by a preset distance, wherein the infrared cutoff layer covers the metal foil layer, in the device of Huang according to the teachings of Li, with the motivation of having a light-shielding effect. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STANETTA D ISAAC whose telephone number is (571)272-1671. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Leonard Chang can be reached at 571-270-3691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STANETTA D ISAAC/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 March 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 08, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 05, 2025
Interview Requested
Mar 13, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 02, 2025
Interview Requested
Jun 17, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 17, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 21, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604706
APPARATUS INCLUDING TRANSPARENT MATERIAL FOR TRANSPARENT PROCESS PERFORMANCE AND METHOD USING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604715
ISOLATION STRUCTURE AND MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593714
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING BONDING ENHANCEMENT LAYER AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593496
Multiple Threshold Voltage Implementation Through Lanthanum Incorporation
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581981
Method of Forming an Interconnection between an Electric Component and an Electronic Component
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
48%
With Interview (-37.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 948 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month