Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 20, 2026
Application No. 17/850,778

INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURE WITH BACKSIDE POWER STAPLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 27, 2022
Examiner
HOANG, TUAN A
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
364 granted / 497 resolved
+5.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
519
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 497 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of layout A, with feedthrough architecture II, and modification IIB in the reply filed on 10/15/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 4, 6-10, 16-20 have been withdrawn from consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al. (US 2020/0303551 A1) in view of Lilak et al. (US 2020/0294998 A1). Regarding claim 1, Chen teaches an integrated circuit structure (1500 in Fig. 15 of Chen which is built up from 1400 in Figs. 1-14), comprising: a plurality of gate lines (1216, as shown in Fig. 14) extending over a plurality of channel structures (1204); a plurality of trench contacts (1218, as shown in Fig. 13) extending over a plurality of source or drain structures (802A/B in Fig. 8), individual ones of the plurality of trench contacts alternating with individual ones of the plurality of gate lines (as shown in Fig. 12 of Chen); a front-side metal routing layer (1324-1328 in Fig. 15) extending over one or more of the plurality of gate lines, and over and coupled to one or more of the plurality of trench contacts (as described in [0090] of Chen); a backside metal routing layer (1524 in Fig. 15) extending beneath the one or more of the plurality of gate lines and the one or more of the plurality of trench contacts, the backside metal routing layer parallel and overlapping with the front-side metal routing layer (as shown in Fig. 15); and a conductive feedthrough structure (1522, 1404, 1208, V0, V1 in Figs. 7, 8 and 15) coupling the backside metal routing layer to the front-side metal routing layer. But Chen does not teach that the plurality of channel structures are semiconductor nanowire stacks. Lilak teaches a semiconductor device. The channel structures of the device are stacks of nanowires (116A/B in Fig. 1A of Lilak) and the gate structures (120A/B) wrap around the stacks of nanowire channel structures. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have made the channel structures from nanowire stacks in order to have improved the device performance (avoid short-channel effects, increase gate-channel interface…). Regarding claim 2, Chen in view of Lilak teaches all limitations of the integrated circuit structure of claim 1, and also teaches wherein the backside metal routing layer is a backside power delivery line (as stated in [0095] of Chen, 1524 are power grid conductors). Regarding claim 3, Chen in view of Lilak teaches all limitations of the integrated circuit structure of claim 1, and also teaches wherein the conductive feedthrough structure is in an isolation location (dielectric layer 1320 in Fig. 13 of Chen). Regarding claim 5, Chen in view of Lilak teaches all limitations of the integrated circuit structure of claim 1, and also teaches wherein the conductive feedthrough structure is a boundary deep via segment (1522 in Fig. 15 of Chen). Claims 11-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lilak in view of Chen. Regarding claim 11, Lilak teaches a computing device (1000 in Fig. 10 of Lilak), comprising: a board (motherboard 1002); and a component (processor 1004) coupled to the board, the component including an integrated circuit structure (IC structure shown in Fig. 1A), comprising: a plurality of gate lines (120A/B in Fig. 1A) extending over a plurality of semiconductor nanowire stack channel structures (116A/B); But Lilak does not teach that the IC structure comprising: a plurality of trench contacts extending over a plurality of source or drain structures, individual ones of the plurality of trench contacts alternating with individual ones of the plurality of gate lines; a front-side metal routing layer extending over one or more of the plurality of gate lines, and over and coupled to one or more of the plurality of trench contacts; a backside metal routing layer extending beneath the one or more of the plurality of gate lines and the one or more of the plurality of trench contacts, the backside metal routing layer parallel and overlapping with the front-side metal routing layer; and a conductive feedthrough structure coupling the backside metal routing layer to the front-side metal routing layer. Chen teaches an integrated circuit structure (1500 in Fig. 15 of Chen which is built up from 1400 in Figs. 1-14), comprising: a plurality of gate lines (1216, as shown in Fig. 14) extending over a plurality of semiconductor nanowire stack channel structures (1204); a plurality of trench contacts (1218, as shown in Fig. 13) extending over a plurality of source or drain structures (802A/B in Fig. 8), individual ones of the plurality of trench contacts alternating with individual ones of the plurality of gate lines (as shown in Fig. 12 of Chen); a front-side metal routing layer (1324-1328 in Fig. 15) extending over one or more of the plurality of gate lines, and over and coupled to one or more of the plurality of trench contacts (as described in [0090] of Chen); a backside metal routing layer (1524 in Fig. 15) extending beneath the one or more of the plurality of gate lines and the one or more of the plurality of trench contacts, the backside metal routing layer parallel and overlapping with the front-side metal routing layer (as shown in Fig. 15); and a conductive feedthrough structure (1522, 1404, 1208, V0, V1 in Figs. 7, 8 and 15) coupling the backside metal routing layer to the front-side metal routing layer. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used the front and backside contact structures of Chen in Lilak’s device in order to decrease the interconnection density which helps with interference problem, thus, allowing scaling down of the IC structure. Regarding claim 12, Lilak in view of Chen teaches all limitations of the computing device of claim 11, and further comprising: a memory (DRAM/ROM in Fig. 10 of Lilak) coupled to the board. Regarding claim 13, Lilak in view of Chen teaches all limitations of the computing device of claim 11, and further comprising: a communication chip (1006 in Fig. 10 of Lilak) coupled to the board. Regarding claim 14, Lilak in view of Chen teaches all limitations of the computing device of claim 11, and further comprising: a camera (camera in Fig. 10 of Lilak) coupled to the board. Regarding claim 15, Lilak in view of Chen teaches all limitations of the computing device of claim 11, and wherein the component is a packaged integrated circuit die (as described in [0065] of Lilak). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN A HOANG whose telephone number is (571)270-0406. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-9am, 10am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at (571) 272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Tuan A Hoang/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 29, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12568677
METHOD OF SELF-ALIGNED DIELECTRIC WALL FORMATION FOR FORKSHEET APPLICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568641
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH VARYING NUMBERS OF CHANNEL LAYERS AND METHOD OF FABRICATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563822
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563761
Vertically Stacked Transistor Structures
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563812
COMPOSITE GATE DIELECTRIC FOR HIGH-VOLTAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month