Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 17/859,539

SHIFTING SLEEVE OPERATED WITH PLUG AGAINST TWO OR MORE PLUG SEATS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jul 07, 2022
Examiner
MICHENER, BLAKE E
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
OA Round
6 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
686 granted / 888 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
912
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
37.4%
-2.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 888 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This communication is a final office action on the merits and in response to amendments filed on 8/24/2026. All currently pending claims have been considered below. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendments & Remarks Applicant's amendments to claim 22 are sufficient to obviate the prior 112(a) rejection. Regarding independent claim 1, the claim is directed to "An inner sleeve" only, per the preamble with "two or more plug seat openings [that are] configured to engage with two or more associated plug seats". The examiner first asserts that it is debatable whether or not the "two or more associated plug seats" are positive structural requirements of the claim given that they are only recited with regard to the "configuration" of the "two or more plug seat openings". In other words, the claim does not recite the "two or more associated plug seats" as a feature of the claim, but rather are introduced as the intended use of the "configuration" of the "two or more plug seat openings". That said, the present amendments recite that "the two or more associated plug seats are configured to be held in the radially retracted state by a surrounding housing at a first axial position of the tubular relative to the surrounding housing and to move from the radially retracted state to the radially extended state upon alignment with one or more plug seat spaces in a body surrounding the tubular at a second axial position of the tubular relative to the body". Even assuming arguendo that the "two or more associated plug seats" are structural requirements of the claim (which is debatable, as discussed above), the preamble is unequivocally clear that "a surrounding housing" and "a body surrounding the tubular" are not structural features of the "inner sleeve". The amendments to claim 1 are entirely non-structural for the "inner sleeve" itself and add no clear limitation to the "inner sleeve" or the "two or more associated plug seats" (even assuming the plug seats are a requirement of the claim). Applicant appears to already understand this scope difference as shown by the amendments to independent claim 11, which add "a body" and already recites "a valve connector housing" with the "inner sleeve located at least partially within the valve connector housing" and does not use the "configured to" phrasing as in claim 1. The examiner respectfully maintains the 102 rejection of claim 1 over US 2012/0305265 (Garcia). The amendments to claims 11 & 22 are sufficient to overcome the prior rejections thereof. New grounds necessitated by amendment respectfully follow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 7-11, 15, 16, & 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2012/0305265 (Garcia). Independent claim 1. Garcia teaches an inner sleeve ("an inner sleeve or insert 120" ¶ 29, fig 2A-4B), comprising: a tubular (the sleeve 120 is tubular: figs 2A-4B) having an uphole end (upper side as seen in the figures), a downhole end (lower side), an inside tubular surface (clearly conveyed by the figures), and an outside tubular surface (ibid), the inside tubular surface and the outside tubular surface defining a sidewall thickness (t) (ibid; a tubular sleeve inherently has a sidewall thickness of some amount), the outside tubular surface having a first outer diameter (d1) (d1 as indicated in the annotated version of fig 4A above) and a second smaller outer diameter (d2) (d2 as indicated in PNG media_image1.png 641 667 media_image1.png Greyscale the annotated version of fig 4A here), a transition between the first outer diameter (d1) and the second smaller outer diameter (d2) forming a no-go shoulder (Indicated by the oval annotation in the figures above. It is clearly shown in fig 4B as seating on a matching outer shoulder - i.e. it is "a no-go shoulder" in the same manner as the present case); and two or more plug seat openings (slots 122: "The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120." - ¶ 31) circumferentially positioned about the tubular (figs 2B, 3B, 4B) and extending from the outside tubular surface to the inside tubular surface and through an entirety of the sidewall thickness (t) (slots 122 extend entirely through the sidewall as shown in vertical cross-section in fig 2A and horizontal cross-section in fig 2B; also clearly conveyed in figs 4A & 4B), the two or more plug seat openings configured to engage with two or more associated plug seats (keys or dogs 142 - [0031] - "To move the insert 120, the ball 130 dropped down the tubing string from the surface engages a seat 140 inside the insert 120. The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120.. so that the keys 142 define a restricted opening with a diameter (d) smaller than the intended diameter (D) of the dropped ball. As shown, four such keys 142 can be used") and allow the two or more associated plug seats to move between a radially retracted state (fig 3A & B; fig 4A) and a radially extended state (fig 2A & B; fig 4B), the two or more plug seat openings not exposed to either of the uphole end or the downhole end (they are isolated from the ends by the sidewall in the same manner as the present case), wherein the two or more associated plug seats are configured to be ("configured to be" is a recitation of intended use of the plug seats and does not positively require the following features. The "surrounding housing" and "body" are, by definition, not features of the "inner sleeve" as discussed in the Response section above) held in the radially retracted state by a surrounding housing at a first axial position of the tubular relative to the surrounding housing (142 are capable of being held in a retracted state by a non-required "housing") and to move from the radially retracted state to the radially extended state (142 move radially as cited above) upon alignment with one or more plug seat spaces in a body surround the tubular at a second axial position of the tubular relative to the body (142 are capable of expanding radially into non-required "plug seat spaces in a body surrounding the tubular"). The examiner again notes that the amendments to claim 1 are not structural requirements of the "inner sleeve" and that "plug seats" are also arguably not required by the claim. Rather the claim only appears to require "two or more plug seat openings" that are capable of holding "plug seats" that, themselves, are capable of expanding with regards to unrequired surrounding structure. It is evident that Applicant understands this claim interpretation given the wording of independent claim 11. 2. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 1, wherein the two or more plug seat openings are two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (the T-shaped horizontal cross-section of the openings 122 & dogs 142 therein is clearly shown in the horizontal cross-section of figs 2B & 3B. Figs 4A & 4B shows a T-shaped vertical cross-section). 3. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 2, wherein the two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (122) each include a vertical portion (vertical cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A) and a horizontal portion (horizontal cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2B, 3B, 4C). 7. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 2, wherein the two or more T- shaped plug seat openings (122) each include a vertical portion (vertical cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A) and a horizontal portion (horizontal cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2B, 3B, 4C), and wherein the two or more associated plug seats ("plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120" - ¶ 31) are two or more associated T-shaped plug seats (the plugs 142 match the slots 122: figs 2B, 3B, 4A & 4B) engaged within the two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (ibid), the two or more associated T-shaped plug seats each including a vertical plug seat portion and a horizontal plug seat portion (ibid), and further wherein the vertical plug seat portion has a radius of curvature (the seats 142 are clearly shown in figs 2B & 3B to have curved portions matching the curvature of the tubular. This curvature extends vertically along the outer circumference shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A). 8. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 1, further including four or more plug seat openings ("As shown, four such keys 142 can be used, although the seat 140 can have any suitable number of keys 142" - ¶ 31) / associated plug seats (each slot 122 has it's own key 142) circumferentially positioned about the tubular (figs 2B, 3B, 4C) and extending from the outside tubular surface to the inside tubular surface (ibid), each seat engaged with a opening (ibid). 9. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 1, further including a lock ring ("the lock 124 can be a snap ring that reaches a circumferential slot 116 in the housing 110 and expands outward to lock the insert 120 in place. Although the lock 124 is shown as a snap ring 124 is shown, the insert 120 can use a shear ring or other device known in the art to lock the insert 120 in place" - ¶ 33) located within a lock ring groove in the outside tubular surface (fig 2A, 3A), the lock ring and lock ring groove located between the two or more plug seat openings and the downhole end of the tubular (positioned as-claimed; figs 2A, 3A). 10. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 1, further including one or more seals (two "peripheral seals 126 on the insert 120" - ¶ 30; figs 2A & 4A) located within one or more seal grooves in the outside tubular surface (clearly shown in figs 2A & 4A that seals 126 are in unnumbered grooves in the sleeve), the one or more seal grooves located between the two or more plug seat openings and the uphole end of the tubular (ibid). Independent claim 11. Garcia discloses a downhole tool ("a downhole sleeve" - abstract), comprising: a valve connector housing ("catch 128" as "a collet arrangement" - ¶ 32. This is clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120"); a body ("housing 110" - ¶ 29 & fig 2A) coupled to the valve connector housing (110 is connected to 128: figs 2A & 3A), the body including one or more plug seat spaces ("circumferential slot 114" - ¶ 34, figs 2A & 3A); and an inner sleeve ("an inner sleeve or insert 120" ¶ 29, fig 2A-4B) located at least partially within the valve connector housing (128 is clearly shown in fig 2A, 3A, and 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120"), the inner sleeve including: a tubular (the sleeve 120 is tubular: figs 2A-4B) having an uphole end (upper side as seen in the figures), a downhole end (lower side), an inside tubular surface (clearly conveyed by the figures), and an outside tubular surface (ibid), the inside tubular surface and the outside tubular surface defining a sidewall thickness (t) (ibid; a tubular sleeve inherently has a sidewall thickness of some amount), the outside tubular surface having a first outer diameter (d1) (d1 as indicated in the annotated version of fig 4A above) and a second smaller outer diameter (d2) (d2 as indicated in the annotated version of fig 4A above), a transition between the first outer diameter (d1) and the second smaller outer diameter (d2) forming a no-go shoulder (Indicated by the oval annotation in the figures for claim 1 above. It is clearly shown in fig 4B as seating on a matching outer shoulder - i.e. it is "a no-go shoulder" in the same manner as the present case); and two or more plug seat openings (slots 122: "The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120." - ¶ 31) circumferentially positioned about the tubular (figs 2B, 3B, 4B) and extending from the outside tubular surface to the inside tubular surface and through an entirety of the sidewall thickness (t) (slots 122 extend entirely through the sidewall as shown in vertical cross-section in fig 2A and horizontal cross-section in fig 2B; also clearly conveyed in figs 4A & 4B), the two or more plug seat openings not exposed to either of the uphole end or the downhole end, but located between the uphole end and the downhole end (they are isolated from the ends by the sidewall in the same manner as the present case); and two or more associated plug seats (keys or dogs 142 - [0031] - "To move the insert 120, the ball 130 dropped down the tubing string from the surface engages a seat 140 inside the insert 120. The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120.. so that the keys 142 define a restricted opening with a diameter (d) smaller than the intended diameter (D) of the dropped ball. As shown, four such keys 142 can be used") engaged with the two or more plug seat openings (122, as quoted above), the two or more associated plug seats configured to move between a radially retracted state (figs 2A, 4A) and a radially extended state (figs 3A & 4B) as the inner sleeve slides within the valve connector housing (First, "catch 128" may be a "collet" - which has a length as well understood. Second, "catch 128" is clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120" and the insert 120 must move "within" 128 to reach the position of figs 3A & 4B. "Continued fluid pressure then moves the freed insert 120 toward the open condition (FIG. 3A)" - ¶ 33), wherein the valve connector housing ("catch 128" as "a collet arrangement" - ¶ 32. This is clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120") is configured to hold the two or more associated plug seats in the radially retracted state at a first axial position of the inner sleeve ("a catch 128 that initially holds it in its closed condition" - ¶ 32), and wherein the one or more plug seat spaces are configured to receive the two or more associated plug seats in the radially extended state (¶ 33) at a second axial position of the inner sleeve (figs 3A & 4B). The examiner acknowledges that the mapping of "catch 128" as a "collet arrangement" (¶ 32) to the present "valve connector housing" is a broad interpretation. However, it meets all the structural and functional limitations of the claim, and the feature is recited very generically in the claims. Therefore the examiner respectfully asserts that, while broad, it is not an unreasonable interpretation given the level of generality of the element in the claims. 15. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 11, wherein the two or more plug seat openings are two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (the T-shaped horizontal cross-section of the openings 122 & dogs 142 therein is clearly shown in the horizontal cross-section of figs 2B & 3B. Figs 4A & 4B shows a T-shaped vertical cross-section). 16. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 15, wherein the two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (122) each include a vertical portion (vertical cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A) and a horizontal portion (horizontal cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2B, 3B, 4C). 19. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 11, further including four or more plug seat openings ("As shown, four such keys 142 can be used, although the seat 140 can have any suitable number of keys 142" - ¶ 31) / associated plug seats (each slot 122 has it's own key 142) circumferentially positioned about the tubular (figs 2B, 3B, 4C) and extending from the outside tubular surface to the inside tubular surface (ibid), each seat engaged with a opening (ibid). 20. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 11, further including a lock ring ("the lock 124 can be a snap ring that reaches a circumferential slot 116 in the housing 110 and expands outward to lock the insert 120 in place. Although the lock 124 is shown as a snap ring 124 is shown, the insert 120 can use a shear ring or other device known in the art to lock the insert 120 in place" - ¶ 33) located within a lock ring groove in the outside tubular surface (fig 2A, 3A), the lock ring and lock ring groove located between the two or more plug seat openings and the downhole end of the tubular (positioned as-claimed; figs 2A, 3A). 21. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 11, further including one or more seals (two "peripheral seals 126 on the insert 120" - ¶ 30; figs 2A & 4A) located within one or more seal grooves in the outside tubular surface (clearly shown in figs 2A & 4A that seals 126 are in unnumbered grooves in the sleeve), the one or more seal grooves located between the two or more plug seat openings and the uphole end of the tubular (ibid). Claims 4-6, 17, & 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2012/0305265 (Garcia) in view of US 4,765,402 (Smith). Claims 4 & 17. Garcia discloses all the limitations of the parent claims, but Garcia does not expressly disclose that a downhole sidewall of the vertical portion of the opening is angled downhole. However Smith discloses a tubular inner sleeve ("The seal body 43 includes a lower tubular extent 53 which is provided with a plurality of window openings 55. Preferably, there are four window openings provided at one circumferential location about the lower tubular extent 53, the window openings 55 being provided at evenly spaced 90.degree. locations. Each of the window openings 55 is provided with an upper and a lower tapered ramp surface 57, 59." - first full ¶ of col 4. Shown in figs 1 & 6 among other places) having two or more plug seat openings ("window openings 55") circumferentially positioned about the tubular (ibid) and extending from the outside of the tubular surface to the inside tubular surface and through an entirety of the sidewall thickness (t) (clearly shown in figs 1 & 5), the two or more plug seat openings configured to engage with matching associated plug seats ("A plurality of latch elements 71"… " The latch elements 71 are thus movable axially and radially within the widow openings 55" - col 4:50-51) and allow the plug seats to move between a radially retracted state ("As the latch elements 71 encounter the increased diameter of the circumferential groove 21, the spring 89 forces the latch elements radially outward to the relaxed position within the groove (see FIG. 2)" - col 5:34-37) and a radially extended state (fig 1), the plug seat openings not exposed to either the uphole end or the downhole end, but located between the uphole and downhole ends (isolated from the ends by the sidewall of seal body 43 in the same manner as the present case; fig 6), wherein a downhole sidewall of the vertical portion of the opening is angled downhole ("Each of the window openings 55 is provided with an upper and a lower tapered ramp surface 57, 59. The lower ramp surface 59 forms an angle of approximately 45.degree. with respect to the longitudinal axis of the lower tubular extent 53" - first full ¶ of col 4). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to angle the downhole vertical portion of the slots taught by Garcia as taught by Smith. This provides a camming surface against which the seat can engage and slide to aid in moving the seat radially outward (col 4:33-41 & col 4:55-58) as is the function of both references' retractable seats. 5. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 4, wherein the two or more associated plug seats are two or more associated T-shaped plug seats engaged within the two or more T- shaped plug seat openings (Garcia: the T-shaped horizontal cross-section of the openings 122 & dogs 142 therein is clearly shown in the horizontal cross-section of figs 2B & 3B. Figs 4A & 4B shows a T-shaped vertical cross-section. The modification of Smith only adds sloping camming surface to a lower end of this), the two or more T-shaped plug seat openings allowing the two or more associated T-shaped plug seats to move between the radially retracted state and the radially extended state (ibid). 6 & 18. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 5 / The downhole tool as recited in claim 17, wherein the two or more associated T- shaped plug seats each include a vertical plug seat portion (Garcia: vertical cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A) and a horizontal plug seat portion (horizontal cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2B, 3B, 4C), and further wherein a second downhole sidewall of the vertical plug seat portion is angled downhole (as-modified by Smith for claim 4 above, the combination has "lower tapered ramp surface 59" which engages "lower axial projections 87" of "latch elements 71" - fig 4 of Smith). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to angle the downhole vertical portion of the seat taught by Garcia as taught by Smith. This provides a camming surface against which the seat can engage and slide to aid in moving the seat radially outward (col 4:33-41 & col 4:55-58) as is the function of both references' retractable seats. Claims 11-16, 19-30, & 33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 4,474,241 (Freeman) in view of US 2012/0305265 (Garcia). Independent claim 11. Freeman discloses a downhole tool ("Differential fill float collar 20" - col 5:20) comprising: a valve connector housing ("tubular upper housing 52" and "lower housing 90" which hold two valves as clearly shown in fig 1); and an inner sleeve located at least partially within the valve connector housing ("Activating sleeve 130"), the inner sleeve including: a tubular ("activating sleeve 130" - fig 1) having an uphole end (upper side as viewed in the figures), a downhole end (lower side as viewed in the figures), an inside tubular surface, and an outside tubular surface (both clearly conveyed by fig 1), the tubular surface and the outside tubular surface defining a sidewall thickness (ibid) the outside tubular surface having a first diameter (d1) (holding "opposed shear pins 150" - fig 1) and a second smaller outer diameter (d2) (holding "ports 148" - fig 1), a transition between the first outer diameter (d1) and the second smaller outer diameter (d2) forming a no-go shoulder ("annular shoulder 145" - figs 1-3); a plug seat positioned on the inside tubular surface ("annular lip 136" - fig 1) configured to catch a dropped ball ("tripping ball 200" - fig 2), move axially in response to fluid pressure on the dropped ball (transition between figs 2 & 3; ¶ bridging cols 5 & 6), and after movement, selectively fail and allow the dropped ball to pass through the downhole tool ("As activating sleeve 130 reaches the full extent of its travel, ball 200 is extended past annular lip 136 and is pumped out of float collar 20 to the bottom of the well bore" - ibid), wherein the valve connector housing ("tubular upper housing 52" and "lower housing 90" which hold two valves as clearly shown in fig 1) is configured to hold the plug seat in the radially retracted state (via "shear pins 150" - col 4:49-55) at a first axial position of the inner sleeve (fig 1). As discussed above, Freeman discloses an annular lip seat 136 that bends and fails under the ultimate pressure applied to the ball after the sleeve stops moving (figs 1 vs fig 3; col 6:11-14), not plug seat openings and radially retractable plug seats engaged therein. Further, Freeman does not disclose a body coupled to the valve connector housing, the body including one or more plug seat spaces that receive the two or more plug seats at a second axial position of the inner sleeve. However Garcia discloses a downhole tool ("a downhole sleeve" - abstract), comprising: a valve connector housing ("catch 128" as "a collet arrangement" - ¶ 32. This is clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120"); a body ("housing 110" - ¶ 29 & fig 2A) coupled to the valve connector housing (110 is connected to 128: figs 2A & 3A), the body including one or more plug seat spaces ("circumferential slot 114" - ¶ 34, figs 2A & 3A); and an inner sleeve ("an inner sleeve or insert 120" ¶ 29, fig 2A-4B) located at least partially within the valve connector housing (128 is clearly shown in fig 2A, 3A, and 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120"), the inner sleeve including: a tubular (the sleeve 120 is tubular: figs 2A-4B) having an uphole end (upper side as seen in the figures), a downhole end (lower side), an inside tubular surface (clearly conveyed by the figures), and an outside tubular surface (ibid), the inside tubular surface and the outside tubular surface defining a sidewall thickness (t) (ibid; a tubular sleeve inherently has a sidewall thickness of some amount), the outside tubular surface having a first outer diameter (d1) (d1 as indicated in the annotated version of fig 4A above) and a second smaller outer diameter (d2) (d2 as indicated in the annotated version of fig 4A above), a transition between the first outer diameter (d1) and the second smaller outer diameter (d2) forming a no-go shoulder (Indicated by the oval annotation in the figures for claim 1 above. It is clearly shown in fig 4B as seating on a matching outer shoulder - i.e. it is "a no-go shoulder" in the same manner as the present case); and two or more plug seat openings (slots 122: "The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120." - ¶ 31) circumferentially positioned about the tubular (figs 2B, 3B, 4B) and extending from the outside tubular surface to the inside tubular surface and through an entirety of the sidewall thickness (t) (slots 122 extend entirely through the sidewall as shown in vertical cross-section in fig 2A and horizontal cross-section in fig 2B; also clearly conveyed in figs 4A & 4B), the two or more plug seat openings not exposed to either of the uphole end or the downhole end, but located between the uphole end and the downhole end (they are isolated from the ends by the sidewall in the same manner as the present case); and two or more associated plug seats (keys or dogs 142 - [0031] - "To move the insert 120, the ball 130 dropped down the tubing string from the surface engages a seat 140 inside the insert 120. The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120.. so that the keys 142 define a restricted opening with a diameter (d) smaller than the intended diameter (D) of the dropped ball. As shown, four such keys 142 can be used") engaged with the two or more plug seat openings (122, as quoted above), the two or more associated plug seats configured to move between a radially retracted state (figs 2A, 4A) and a radially extended state (figs 3A & 4B) as the inner sleeve slides within the valve connector housing (First, "catch 128" may be a "collet" - which has a length as well understood. Second, "catch 128" is clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120" and the insert 120 must move "within" 128 to reach the position of figs 3A & 4B. "Continued fluid pressure then moves the freed insert 120 toward the open condition (FIG. 3A)" - ¶ 33), wherein the valve connector housing ("catch 128" as "a collet arrangement" - ¶ 32. This is clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120") is configured to hold the two or more associated plug seats in the radially retracted state at a first axial position of the inner sleeve ("a catch 128 that initially holds it in its closed condition" - ¶ 32), and wherein the one or more plug seat spaces are configured to receive the two or more associated plug seats in the radially extended state (¶ 33) at a second axial position of the inner sleeve (figs 3A & 4B). After expansion, the dropped ball passes through the seat and down further into the well (¶ 34) just as in Freeman as cited above. Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to use the retractable seats taught by Garcia for the dropped ball seat taught by Freeman. This allows the full path of the flowbore to be open after release of the ball (fig 3A of Garcia). Further, the use of multiple frangible / shear / selectively failing features in series as taught by Freeman (shear pin 150 must fail before seat 136; transition between figs 1 & 3 of Freeman) means that the seat 136 must be carefully manufactured so as to fail at a desired pressure but not before shear pin 150 fails. The retractable seats taught by Garcia only extend outward upon the sleeve reaching "circumferential slot 114" (¶ 34) which means it can be more easily guaranteed that seats 142 will only retract after the initial movement of the sleeve and the shearing of the initial retaining shear pin (128, ¶3 2 of Garcia; 150 of Freeman). Further, Freeman discloses using "shear pins 150" to secure the sleeve in the first position. Garcia teaches "catch 128" as "a collet arrangement" (¶ 32) that (A) serves the same function as the shear pins of Freeman and (B) is an alternative of a "shear ring" (ibid). These are clearly commensurate locking structures and known variations of each other. Garcia teaches a collet that extends around the inner sleeve and through which the inner sleeve moves once released in an analogous tool with a reasonable expectation of success. 12. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 11, wherein the body ("housing 110" - ¶ 29 & fig 2A of Garcia as used to modify Freeman for claim 11) is configured to fit within a casing string (It is possible to insert the tool of Freeman in view of Garcia within a casing string of appropriate size. The claim is not a method); and further including: a first valve located within the body ("back pressure flapper 66" - fig 1) and configured to open (fig 1) and close (transition from fig 1 to fig 3) a fluid flow path through the valve connector housing (ibid), wherein the first valve is in a first valve open position (fig 1 is run-in position); and a second valve located within the body ("Double flapper valve 170" - fig 1) and configured to open (fig 3) and close (fig 1) the fluid flow path through the valve connector housing (ibid), wherein the second valve opens to a second valve open position in a direction away from the wellhead of the wellbore (valve 17 opens downhole: fig 3). 13. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 12, wherein the first valve is configured to be in the first valve open position (Freeman: fig 1 is the run-in position and 66 is open) and the second valve is configured to be in a second valve closed position (170 is in the "a second valve closed position" in fig 1) during placement of the downhole tool in the wellbore (col 3:24-27. The examiner notes that: (A) "a second valve closed position" neither excludes 186 being open while 172 is closed because both are sub-elements of 170; (B), the "second valve" can be drawn to just 172; and (C) "double flapper valve 170", including "fillup flapper 186" are biased towards the closed position: col 5:14-16). 14. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 12, wherein movement of the two or more associated plug seats into the one or more plug seat spaces (Garcia: "When the insert 120 reaches its opened condition, the keys 124 eventually reach another circumferential slot 114 in the housing 110. As best shown in FIG. 3B, the keys 124 retract slightly in the insert 120 when they reach the slot 114." - ¶ 34) permits a plug (Garcia: "an appropriately sized ball 130 (or other form of plug)" - ¶ 29) engaged with the two or more associated plug seats ("the ball 130 dropped down the tubing string from the surface engages a seat 140 inside the insert 120. The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142..." - ¶ 31) to disengage from the two or more associated plug seats and pass through the inner sleeve ("As best shown in FIG. 3B, the keys 124 retract slightly in the insert 120 when they reach the slot 114. This allows the ball 130 to move or be pushed past the keys 124 so the ball 130 can travel out of the cluster sleeve 100 and further downhole..." - ¶ 34). 15. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 11, wherein the two or more plug seat openings are two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (the T-shaped horizontal cross-section of the openings 122 & dogs 142 therein is clearly shown in the horizontal cross-section of figs 2B & 3B. Figs 4A & 4B shows a T-shaped vertical cross-section). 16. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 15, wherein the two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (122) each include a vertical portion (vertical cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A) and a horizontal portion (horizontal cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2B, 3B, 4C). 19. The inner sleeve as recited in Claim 1 , further including four or more plug seat openings (Garcia: "As shown, four such keys 142 can be used, although the seat 140 can have any suitable number of keys 142" - ¶ 31) / associated plug seats (each slot 122 has it's own key 142) circumferentially positioned about the tubular (figs 2B, 3B, 4C) and extending from the outside tubular surface to the inside tubular surface (ibid), each seat engaged with a opening (ibid). 20. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 11, further including a lock ring (Garcia: "the lock 124 can be a snap ring that reaches a circumferential slot 116 in the housing 110 and expands outward to lock the insert 120 in place. Although the lock 124 is shown as a snap ring 124 is shown, the insert 120 can use a shear ring or other device known in the art to lock the insert 120 in place" - ¶ 33) located within a lock ring groove in the outside tubular surface (fig 2A, 3A), the lock ring and lock ring groove located between the two or more plug seat openings and the downhole end of the tubular (positioned as-claimed; figs 2A, 3A). 21. The downhole tool as recited in Claim 11, further including one or more seals (Garcia: two "peripheral seals 126 on the insert 120" - ¶ 30; figs 2A & 4A) located within one or more seal grooves in the outside tubular surface (clearly shown in figs 2A & 4A that seals 126 are in unnumbered grooves in the sleeve), the one or more seal grooves located between the two or more plug seat openings and the uphole end of the tubular (ibid). Therefore it would have been obvious to PHOSITA at the time of filing to use the seals taught by either Garcia on the sleeve taught by Freeman. Similar to claim 11 above, this is the simple addition of a known element to an analogous tool to achieve the predictable result of providing a seal above the seat in addition to the seal below the seat (which is already taught by the modification). The seal performs the same function in the modification as it originally does. Further, it provides redundancy in the event the first seal fails. This is a prima facie case of obviousness. MPEP 2143, subsection I(A). Independent claim 22. Freeman discloses a method ("As the cementing operation is performed…" - col 6:27) comprising: obtaining a casing string ("casing 2" - fig 1 & col 3:40-46) and a downhole tool installed therein ("Differential fill float collar 20" - col 5:20), wherein the downhole tool includes: a valve connector housing ("tubular upper housing 52" and "lower housing 90" which hold two valves as clearly shown in fig 1); an inner sleeve located at least partially within the valve connector housing ("Activating sleeve 130" - fig 1), the inner sleeve including: a tubular ("activating sleeve 130" - fig 1) having an uphole end (upper side as viewed in the figures), a downhole end (lower side as viewed in the figures), an inside tubular surface, and an outside tubular surface (both clearly conveyed by fig 1), the tubular surface and the outside tubular surface defining a sidewall thickness (ibid), the outside tubular surface having a first diameter (d1) (holding "opposed shear pins 150" - fig 1) and a second smaller outer diameter (d2) (holding "ports 148" - fig 1), a transition between the first outer diameter (d1) and the second smaller outer diameter (d2) forming a no-go shoulder ("annular shoulder 145" - figs 1-3); a plug seat positioned on the inside tubular surface ("annular lip 136" - fig 1) configured to catch a dropped ball ("tripping ball 200" - fig 2), move axially in response to fluid pressure on the dropped ball (transition between figs 2 & 3; ¶ bridging cols 5 & 6), and after movement, selectively fail and allow the dropped ball to pass through the downhole tool ("As activating sleeve 130 reaches the full extent of its travel, ball 200 is extended past annular lip 136 and is pumped out of float collar 20 to the bottom of the well bore" - ibid); a first valve located within the body ("back pressure flapper 66" - fig 1) and configured to open (fig 1) and close (transition from fig 1 to fig 3) a fluid flow path through the valve connector housing (ibid), wherein the first valve is in a first valve open position (fig 1 is run-in position); and a second valve located within the body ("Double flapper valve 170" - fig 1) and configured to open (fig 3) and close (fig 1) the fluid flow path through the valve connector housing (ibid), wherein the second valve is in a second valve closed position (fig 1; the examiner notes that the "double flapper valve 170", including "fillup flapper 186" are biased towards the closed position: col 5:14-16); and introducing the casing string and the downhole tool into a wellbore ("Differential fill float collar 20, as previously noted, is run into the open well bore suspended from casing 2" - col 5:20-21). As discussed above, Freeman discloses an annular lip seat 136 that bends and fails under the ultimate pressure applied to the ball after the sleeve stops moving (figs 1 vs fig 3; col 6:11-14), not plug seat openings and radially retractable plug seats engaged therein. Further, Freeman does not disclose a body coupled to the valve connector housing, the body including one or more plug seat spaces that receive the two or more plug seats at a second axial position of the inner sleeve, nor does Freeman disclose a seal located within seal grooves in the outside tubular surface. However Garcia teaches a downhole tool ("a downhole sleeve" - abstract) that includes: a body ("housing 110" - ¶ 29 & fig 2A) coupled to a conveying tubular (via 104: fig 1), the body including one or more plug seat spaces ("circumferential slot 114 in the housing 110" - ¶ 34); a valve connector housing located within the body ("catch 128" as "a collet arrangement" - ¶ 32. This is clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120" and within "housing 110"); an inner sleeve ("an inner sleeve or insert 120" ¶ 29, fig 2A-4B) located at least partially within the valve connector housing (128 is clearly shown in fig 2A, 3A, and 4A as being exterior to and surrounding the upper end of "inner sleeve or insert 120"), the inner sleeve including: a tubular (the sleeve 120 is tubular: figs 2A-4B) having an uphole end (upper side as seen in the figures), a downhole end (lower side), an inside tubular surface (clearly conveyed by the figures), and an outside tubular surface (ibid), the inside tubular surface and the outside tubular surface defining a sidewall thickness (t) (ibid; a tubular sleeve inherently has a sidewall thickness of some amount), the outside tubular surface having a first outer diameter (d1) (d1 as indicated in the annotated version of fig 4A above) and a second smaller outer diameter (d2) (d2 as indicated in the annotated version of fig 4A above), a transition between the first outer diameter (d1) and the second smaller outer diameter (d2) forming a no-go shoulder (Indicated by the oval annotation in the figures above. It is clearly shown in fig 4B as seating on a matching outer shoulder - i.e. it is "a no-go shoulder" in the same manner as the present case); two or more plug seat openings (slots 122: "The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120." - ¶ 31) circumferentially positioned about the tubular (figs 2B, 3B, 4B) and extending from the outside tubular surface to the inside tubular surface and through an entirety of the sidewall thickness (t) (slots 122 extend entirely through the sidewall as shown in vertical cross-section in fig 2A and horizontal cross-section in fig 2B), the two or more plug seat openings configured to engage with two or more associated plug seats (keys or dogs 142 - [0031] - "To move the insert 120, the ball 130 dropped down the tubing string from the surface engages a seat 140 inside the insert 120. The seat 140 includes a plurality of keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122 defined in the insert 120.. so that the keys 142 define a restricted opening with a diameter (d) smaller than the intended diameter (D) of the dropped ball. As shown, four such keys 142 can be used") and allow the two or more associated plug seats to move between a radially retracted state (fig 3A & B) and a radially extended state (fig 2A & B), the two or more plug seat openings not exposed to either of the uphole end or the downhole end (they are isolated from the ends by the sidewall in the same manner as the present case), but located between the uphole end and the downhole end (ibid, figs 2A-4B); and two or more associated plug seats ("keys or dogs 142 disposed in slots 122" - ¶ 31) engaged with the two or more plug seat openings (ibid), the two or more associated plug seats held in a radially retracted states via the connector housing (¶ 33 & 34). After expansion, the dropped ball passes through the seat and down further into the well (¶ 34) just as in Freeman as cited above; and one or more seals ("peripheral seals 126" - ¶ 30 & figs 2A & 4A) located within one or more seal grooves (clearly shown in unnumbered grooves in the outer diameter of the sleeve 120) in the outside tubular surface (figs 2A & 4A), the one or more seals and one or more seal grooves located between the two or more plug seat openings at the uphole end of the tubular (ibid). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to use the retractable seats taught by Garcia for the dropped ball seat taught by Freeman. This allows the full path of the flowbore to be open after release of the ball (fig 3A of Garcia). Further, the use of multiple frangible / shear / selectively failing features in series as taught by Freeman (shear pin 150 must fail before seat 136; transition between figs 1 & 3 of Freeman) means that the seat 136 must be carefully manufactured so as to fail at a desired pressure but not before shear pin 150 fails. The retractable seats taught by Garcia only extend outward upon the sleeve reaching "circumferential slot 114" (¶ 34) which means it can be more easily guaranteed that seats 142 will only retract after the initial movement of the sleeve and the shearing of the initial retaining shear pin (128, ¶3 2 of Garcia; 150 of Freeman). 23. The method as recited in Claim 22, further including introducing cement composition into an annulus located between a wall of the wellbore and an outside of the casing string after introducing the casing string and the downhole tool into the wellbore (Conventional cementing circulation: pumping cement through the interior of the casing, out the bottom, and into the annulus, as is exceedingly well understood. Freeman: "When it is desired to actuate the back pressure valve… after circulation has been established prior to initiating of the cementing operation for the casing, a weighted tripping ball is dropped, which breaks the pin holding open the back pressure flapper. After cementing has been completed, the released back pressure flapper prevents cement flow back into the casing from the well bore annulus." - col 1:39-47). 24. The method as recited in Claim 23, wherein the two or more associated plug seats ("keys or dogs 142" of Garcia) held in the radially retracted state extend radially inward from the inside tubular surface (fig 2A; the same is similarly true of the lip 136 of Freeman that is modified by Garcia for claim 22 above), and further including introducing a plug into the casing string and the inner sleeve (taught by both references: "tripping ball 200" & fig 2 of Freeman; "dropped ball 130" & fig 2A of Garcia), wherein the plug engages with the two or more plug seats to create a seal and a pressure differential, and wherein the pressure differential causes the inner sleeve to shift downhole (taught by both references: Freeman: " tripping ball 200 is dropped down the casing bore 4, where it travels downward until it seats on annular lip 136 in activating sleeve 130. The pressure above ball 200 will build until shear pin 150 shears (FIG. 2), and activating sleeve 130 travels downward releasing back pressure flapper 66" - col 5:59-64 of Freeman. Garcia: "When the dropped ball 130 reaches the seat 140 in the closed condition, fluid pressure pumped down through the sleeve's bore 102 forces against the obstructing ball 130. Eventually, the force releases the insert 120 from a catch 128 that initially holds it in its closed condition. As shown, the catch 128 can be a shear ring, although a collet arrangement or other device known in the art could be used to hold the insert 120 temporarily in its closed condition… Continued fluid pressure then moves the freed insert 120 toward the open condition (FIG. 3A)." - ¶s 32 & 33 of Garcia). 25. The method as recited in Claim 24, wherein the shift downhole moves the first valve (66 of Freeman) to a first valve closed position (fig 3 of Freeman) and the second valve (170 of Freeman) to a second valve open position (fig 3 of Freeman). 26. The method as recited in Claim 24, wherein the shift downhole allows the two or more associated plug seats ("keys 142" of Garcia) to encounter one or more plug seat spaces ("When the insert 120 reaches its opened condition, the keys 124 eventually reach another circumferential slot 114 in the housing 110. As best shown in FIG. 3B, the keys 124 retract slightly in the insert 120 when they reach the slot 114." - ¶ 34) in the body and move from the radially retracted state to the radially extended state (ibid). 27. The method as recited in Claim 26, wherein the pressure differential against the plug moves the two or more associated plug seats from the radially retracted state to the radially extended state when they encounter the one or more plug seat spaces in the body (¶s 33 & 34 of Garcia). 28. The method as recited in Claim 26, wherein the move of the two or more associated plug seats from the radially retracted state to the radially extended state allows the plug to disengage from the two or more associated plug seats and leave the downhole tool ("As best shown in FIG. 3B, the keys 124 retract slightly in the insert 120 when they reach the slot 114. This allows the ball 130 to move or be pushed past the keys 124 so the ball 130 can travel out of the cluster sleeve 100 and further downhole" - ¶ 34 of Garcia). 29. The method as recited in Claim 22, wherein the two or more plug seat openings are two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (the T-shaped horizontal cross-section of the openings 122 & dogs 142 therein is clearly shown in the horizontal cross-section of figs 2B & 3B. Figs 4A & 4B shows a T-shaped vertical cross-section). 30. The method as recited in Claim 29, wherein the two or more T-shaped plug seat openings (122) each include a vertical portion (vertical cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A) and a horizontal portion (horizontal cross-sections clearly shown in figs 2B, 3B, 4C). 33. The method as recited in Claim 22, further including a snap ring (Garcia: "the lock 124 can be a snap ring that reaches a circumferential slot 116 in the housing 110 and expands outward to lock the insert 120 in place. Although the lock 124 is shown as a snap ring 124 is shown, the insert 120 can use a shear ring or other device known in the art to lock the insert 120 in place" - ¶ 33) located within a snap ring groove in the outside tubular surface (figs 2A, 3A), the snap ring and the snap ring groove located between two or more plug seat openings and the downhole end of the tubular (positioned as-claimed; figs 2A, 3A). Therefore it would have been obvious to PHOSITA at the time of filing to place the snap ring between the plug seat openings and the downhole end of the tubular as taught by Garcia in figs 2A & 3A in the combination. First, the primary reference teaches an analogous structure with "split lock ring 156" but discloses it in a radially surrounding roove, not a groove in the tubular. Garcia teaches the claimed orientation as achieving the same result in the same manner, but is a slightly different physical orientation, and would therefore be obvious to try with a reasonable expectation of success. Claims 31 & 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of US 4,474,241 (Freeman) & US 2012/0305265 (Garcia), in further view of US 4,765,402 (Smith). Claim 31. The combination discloses all the limitations of the parent claims but does not expressly disclose that a downhole sidewall of the vertical portion of the opening is angled downhole. However Smith discloses a tubular inner sleeve ("The seal body 43 includes a lower tubular extent 53 which is provided with a plurality of window openings 55. Preferably, there are four window openings provided at one circumferential location about the lower tubular extent 53, the window openings 55 being provided at evenly spaced 90.degree. locations. Each of the window openings 55 is provided with an upper and a lower tapered ramp surface 57, 59." - first full ¶ of col 4. Shown in figs 1 & 6 among other places) having two or more plug seat openings ("window openings 55") circumferentially positioned about the tubular (ibid) and extending from the outside of the tubular surface to the inside tubular surface and through an entirety of the sidewall thickness (t) (clearly shown in figs 1 & 5), the two or more plug seat openings configured to engage with matching associated plug seats ("A plurality of latch elements 71"… " The latch elements 71 are thus movable axially and radially within the widow openings 55" - col 4:50-51) and allow the plug seats to move between a radially retracted state ("As the latch elements 71 encounter the increased diameter of the circumferential groove 21, the spring 89 forces the latch elements radially outward to the relaxed position within the groove (see FIG. 2)" - col 5:34-37) and a radially extended state (fig 1), the plug seat openings not exposed to either the uphole end or the downhole end, but located between the uphole and downhole ends (isolated from the ends by the sidewall of seal body 43 in the same manner as the present case; fig 6), wherein a downhole sidewall of the vertical portion of the opening is angled downhole ("Each of the window openings 55 is provided with an upper and a lower tapered ramp surface 57, 59. The lower ramp surface 59 forms an angle of approximately 45.degree. with respect to the longitudinal axis of the lower tubular extent 53" - first full ¶ of col 4). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to angle the downhole vertical portion of the slots taught by Garcia as taught by Smith. This provides a camming surface against which the seat can engage and slide to aid in moving the seat radially outward (col 4:33-41 & col 4:55-58) as is the function of both references' retractable seats. 32. The method as recited in Claim 31, wherein the two or more associated plug seats are two or more associated T-shaped plug seats (the keys 142 match the T-shape of the slots, as shown in figs 2B, 3B, 4A, & 4B of Garcia), and further wherein the two or more associated T- shaped plug seats each include a vertical plug seat portion (clearly shown in figs 2A, 3A, 4A, & 4B as similarly cited above) and a horizontal plug seat portion (figs 2B, 3B, 4C), and further wherein a second downhole sidewall of the vertical plug seat portion is angled downhole (as-modified by Smith for claim 31 above, the combination has "lower tapered ramp surface 59" which engages "lower axial projections 87" of "latch elements 71" - fig 4 of Smith). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to angle the downhole vertical portion of the seat taught by Garcia as taught by Smith. This provides a camming surface against which the seat can engage and slide to aid in moving the seat radially outward (col 4:33-41 & col 4:55-58) as is the function of both references' retractable seats. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Blake Michener whose telephone number is (571)270-5736. The examiner can normally be reached Approximately 9:00am to 6:00pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara Schimpf can be reached at 571.270.7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BLAKE MICHENER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
May 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 02, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 24, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12760602
IMPROVED DRILL BIT
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760623
TUBULAR STRING SHROUD SYSTEM
1y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754522
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FORMATION MECHANICAL ANALYSIS
5y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753661
TUBULAR HANDLING WITH SPIDER CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753657
HYDROJETS ROTARY DRILL BIT
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.2%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 888 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month