Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 17/863,926

ELECTRICAL ACCESSORY CONNECTOR

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Jul 13, 2022
Priority
Nov 07, 2019 — CN 201911078992.9 +1 more
Examiner
GUSHI, ROSS N
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Emomo Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1245 granted / 1483 resolved
+16.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1504
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1483 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding claim 3, the limitation of the contact block configured to “automatically couple” to the corresponding power interface set is ambiguous. It is unclear what would or would not be considered “automatically” coupling as opposed to non-automatically coupling. The limitation is given little weight. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the anticipatory rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102 made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Johnson et al. US 10998673 (“Johnson”). Regarding claim 1, Johnson discloses an electrical connector 20 for (i.e., capable of) electrically coupling an electrical accessory to a furniture item, the electrical connector comprising: a support column 22 (labeled SC in annotated figure 3 below); a power interface set (labeled PIS below, including the cable 26, wires 26a, contacts 54, magnet 56, and the housing portions supporting the electrical and magnetic components) provided in an interior of the support column, the power interface set comprising an electrically contactable lower surface (surface 51 and the exposed surfaces of the pins 54), wherein the electrically contactable lower surface is spaced apart from an end (labeled SCE below) of the support column, a distance between the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set and the end of the support column is equal to a length of a retention portion (labeled RP below) of the support column, and the retention portion and the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set are together dimensioned for connection to an external power source coupled to the furniture item. PNG media_image1.png 1134 1022 media_image1.png Greyscale Per claim 2 the retention portion of the support column is configured for (i.e., capable of) insertion into a support base installed in a furniture item, and the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set is configured for (i.e., capable of) electrically connecting with a corresponding power interface set provided in the support base. Per claim 3 the power interface set provided in the support column further comprises a magnetic contact block (labeled MCB above, including the housing portion projecting in the interior space 34 and the magnet 56) configured to couple to the corresponding power interface set provided in the support base. Per claim 4 the lower surface of the power interface set provided in the support column further comprises a projection (labeled PRJ above, the portion extending from surface 51) extending from the magnetic contact block; and the projection is dimensioned to be received in a slot formed in an upper surface of the corresponding power interface set provided in the support base. Per claim 5, the retention portion of the support column is configured for (i.e., capable of) insertion into a support base installed in a furniture item . . . wherein the support base, which is not part of the claimed invention, is as described and wherein the retention portion of the support column is dimensioned to be received in the annular support slot. Per claim 6, the retention portion of the support column is configured for (i.e., capable of) insertion into a support base installed in a furniture item . . . wherein the support base, which is not part of the claimed invention, is as described. Per claim 7, the retention portion of the support column is configured for (i.e., capable of) insertion into a support base installed in a furniture item . . . wherein the support base, which is not part of the claimed invention, is as described. Per claim 8, Johnson discloses an electrical accessory comprising a connector 20 for (i.e., capable of) electrically coupling to a furniture item, the electrical connector comprising: a power interface set (labeled PIS above, including the cable 26, wires 26a, contacts 54, magnet 56, and the housing portions supporting the electrical and magnetic components) provided in an interior of a support column 22, the power interface set comprising an electrically contactable lower surface (surface 51 and the exposed surfaces of the pins 54), wherein the electrically contactable lower surface is spaced apart from an end (labeled SCE above) of the support column, a distance between the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set and the end of the support column is equal to a length of a retention portion (labeled RP below) of the support column, and the retention portion and the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set are together dimensioned for connection to an external power source coupled to the furniture item. Per claim 9, the retention portion of the support column is configured for (i.e., capable of) insertion into a support base installed in a furniture item, and the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set is configured for (i.e., capable of) electrically connecting with a corresponding power interface set provided in the support base. Per claim 10 a conductor (e.g., wires 26a, pins 54) [is] provided in the support column and electrically connected to the power interface set, wherein the conductor is configured for electrical contact with an electrical component in the electrical accessory. Per claim 11 the conductor is configured for (i.e. capable of) electrical contact with a drive control board that is programmed to control power to the electrical accessory. Claim Rejections - and 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 12-16, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Johnson. Regarding claim 12, Johnson implicitly discloses a method of removably electrically coupling an electrical accessory to a furniture item, comprising: inserting a lower end (labeled SCE above) of a support column 22 of the electrical accessory into a support base 40; and contacting an electrically contactable lower surface (surface 51 and the exposed surfaces of the pins 54) of a power interface set (labeled PIS above, including the cable 26, wires 26a, contacts 54, magnet 56, and the housing portions supporting the electrical and magnetic components) provided within a hollow interior of the support column in a spaced apart relationship from the lower end of the support column with an electrically contactable connection (components of the interior of female coupling 42) provided within the support base, wherein the support column and the power interface set are together adapted to be removably connected to the support base and the electrically contactable connection within the support base. To the extent that the steps of assembling the device as shown, for example in figures 3 and 4, are implicit rather than explicit, such steps would have been obvious. Per claim 13, the support base is installed in the furniture item (col. 5, lines 55-65, the noted equipment or devices inherently include “furniture,” i.e., “movable objects designed to support various human activities.” Google definition. Per claim 14, the step of inserting the lower end of the support column into an annular support slot (labeled ANSS below, at lead line 100 in figure 3) provided within a chamber (interior of female coupling 42) of the support base, wherein contacting the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set with the electrically contactable connection comprises receiving the electrically contactable connection within the hollow interior of the support column when the lower end of the support column is inserted into the annular support slot would have been obvious (see figures 3 and 4). PNG media_image2.png 1280 968 media_image2.png Greyscale Per claim 15, a distance between the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set and the lower end of the support column is equal to a length of a retention portion (labeled RP above) of the support column, and the retention portion is dimensioned to be received within the support base. Per claim 16, a depth of the annular support slot is substantially equal to the length of the retention portion, such that the retention portion is received within the annular support slot. Per claim 19 contacting the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set with the electrically contactable connection further comprises: inserting a projection (labeled PRJ above) extending from the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set into a slot (labeled SLOT above) formed in an upper surface of the electrically contactable connection. Per claim 20, contacting the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set with the electrically contactable connection comprises: magnetically coupling (via magnets 56, 116) the electrically contactable lower surface of the power interface set to the electrically contactable connection. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROSS GUSHI whose telephone number is (571)272-2005. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday, 8:30 - 5:00. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached on 571-272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROSS N GUSHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 13, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Aug 03, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700723
RETRACTABLE CABLE DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695239
COMB STYLE CONNECTOR AND CONNECTING ASSEMBLY WITH THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695226
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH IMPROVED PROTECTIVE MEMBERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689154
ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE LOCKING SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689160
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH IMPROVED SHIELDING PIECE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+2.7%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1483 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month