Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Emomo Technology Co. Ltd. maintains a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently manages 2 pending office actions, which are distributed across 2 distinct art units. This distribution shows that the company's applications are being reviewed by different specialized groups within the patent office, reflecting the diverse nature of its technology area. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations span different mechanical and e-commerce classifications.
The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, providing different perspectives on the company's patent claims. BAILEY, AMANDA LEE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. With a total of 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is distributed across different individuals. This means that the company must navigate 2 different sets of examiner expectations and 2 separate art unit environments. The lack of concentration under a single examiner or art unit suggests a broader prosecution landscape for Emomo Technology Co. Ltd., requiring a strategy that accounts for the specific feedback of BAILEY, AMANDA LEE and her colleagues.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAILEY, AMANDA LEE | 1 | 55.8% | +42.8% |
| GUSHI, ROSS N | 1 | 83.9% | +2.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17863926 | ELECTRICAL ACCESSORY CONNECTOR | GUSHI, ROSS N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18347321 | CONVERTIBLE BED WITH CONCEALED ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND ELECTRICAL ACCESSORIES | BAILEY, AMANDA LEE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3673 | 1 |
| 2834 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18347321 | CONVERTIBLE BED WITH CONCEALED ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS AND ELECTRICAL ACCESSORIES | BAILEY, AMANDA LEE | 3673 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 05, 2023 |
| 17863926 | ELECTRICAL ACCESSORY CONNECTOR | GUSHI, ROSS N | 2834 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 13, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial