Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/866,016

HIGH ENTROPY CERAMIC FOR PROTECTION OR MULTI-LAYER IFC

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 15, 2022
Examiner
MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T
Art Unit
1789
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
388 granted / 734 resolved
-12.1% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
80 currently pending
Career history
814
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.8%
+13.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 734 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/20/2026 has been entered. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-14 and 16-22 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 6-10 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Buet et al. (FR3059322) in view of Wang (“Processing and properties of high entropy carbides”, Advances in Applied Ceramics: Structural, Functional and Bioceramics. 2022;121(2):57-78). Regarding claims 1-2, 6 and 23, Buet et al. teach a ceramic matrix composite comprising a matrix (16) a fiber disposed in the matrix, a first interface coating layer (could be construed as layer 23) disposed adjacent to an outer surface of the fiber (12), and a first protective layer (could be construed as layer 24 or 33) disposed outward of the first interface coating layer and the fiber and within the matrix wherein the first protective layer comprises a ceramic [claim 1]. Buet et al. teach multiple layers including a second interface coating layer disposed on the first protective layer and a second protective layer disposed on the second interface coating layer and the second protective coating layer comprises a ceramic and the first protective coating layer us disposed on the first interface coating layer. Buet et al. are silent regarding the ceramic being high entropy including high entropy carbide. However, Wang teach high entropy ceramic including high entropy carbide in order to provide improved high-temperature, high-hardness and wear-resistant ceramics. The high entropy ceramic includes at least four cations including a refractory metal cation selected from group consisting of titanium, chromium, zirconium, hafnium, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, molybdenum and tungsten. The high entropy ceramic is a single phase solid solution of cations of the at least four refractory materials in an anionic matrix (rock salt structure taught). Further, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary sill in the art to use single phase solid solution since it would provide higher hardness and strength and provide improved wear resistance. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use the high entropy ceramic of Wang in Buet et al. in order to provide high-temperature, high-hardness and wear-resistant ceramics and arrive at the claimed invention. Regarding claim 3, Buet et al. teach a plurality of fibers (12) with each fiber coated with the first and second interface coating layers and first and second protective layers [Fig. 4 and all layers coat the fibers]. Regarding claim 7, The first protective layer has a thickness in the claimed range. As set forth in MPEP 2144.05, in the case where the claimed range “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art”, a prima facie case of obviousness exists, In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976); In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 16 USPQ2d 1934 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Regarding claim 8, the interface coating layer is boron nitride. Regarding claim 9, the fiber further comprises a carbon layer disposed between the first interface coating layer and the outer surface of the fiber (the coating is formed residually by the heating process). Regarding claim 10, A matrix material (can be construed as the interlayer) is disposed between the first interface coating layer and first protective layer. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/20/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant is invited to amend the claims over the cited art. Applicant’s arguments concerning Vecchio have been fully considered. However, Vecchio is not used in the current rejection. Applicant is invited to amend the claims over the cited art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAWN MCKINNON whose telephone number is (571)272-6116. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday generally 8:00am-5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marla McConnell can be reached at 571-270-7692. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Shawn Mckinnon/Examiner, Art Unit 1789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 15, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 24, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595597
FLEXIBLE, HIGH TEMPERATURE RESISTANT, FLUID RESISTANT, ABRASION RESISTANT, MULTILAYERED WRAPPABLE TEXTILE SLEEVE AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583782
OPTICAL FIBER PREFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584248
POLYAMIDE 46 MULTIFILAMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584276
ARTIFICIAL TURF STRUCTURE HAVING IMPROVED BUFFERING PERFORMANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577706
Lyocell fibers and methods of producing the same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+31.3%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 734 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month