Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/867,764

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2022
Priority
Aug 10, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0105127
Examiner
DIAZ, JOSE R
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
841 granted / 967 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
977
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 967 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species I in the reply filed on April 23, 2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 4-5, 18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (KR 20180000653 A) in view of Yu et al. (US 2021/0193582). Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses a semiconductor package comprising: a first wiring structure (W1) including a first wiring layer (142), and a second wiring layer (112a) disposed on the first wiring layer (142), and connected to a first connecting structure (160/170) placed disposed on the first wiring layer (142) [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated below)]; a first semiconductor chip (120/121) disposed on the first wiring structure (W1) and connected to the first wiring structure (142) through a first connecting pad (122-2) disposed on a first side of the first semiconductor chip (120/121) [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated below)]; a second wiring structure [Machine English Translation, page 11: an opening (not shown) … may be formed on the sealing material 130…a separate connection terminal or the like may be connected to the opened rewiring layer 112b…]; and an insulating member (111) disposed between the first and second wiring structures [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated below)], wherein the first wiring structure (W1) further includes a first signal pattern (142-2a) that is electrically connected (143-2a) to the first connecting pad (122-2) [Fig. 14], and the first signal pattern (142-2a) redistributes the first connecting pad (122-2) to the first connecting structure (170) via the insulating member (111) [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated below): please note that wirings 112b/113 are embedded within insulating member 111]. However, Lee does not disclose a second wiring structure disposed on the first semiconductor chip. Yu teaches a first semiconductor chip (100), an insulating member (222), and a second wiring structure (206) disposed on the first semiconductor chip (100) [Fig. 18A]. Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, would have been motivated to modify Lee by disposing a second wiring structure on the first semiconductor chip as taught by Yu because it helps to provide a connection path to an additional structure such as the package (300) allowing a greater degree of parallel processing capabilities [paragraph 0002 and Figure 18A]. [AltContent: textbox (111)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (W1)][AltContent: ] PNG media_image1.png 448 434 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Lee discloses wherein the insulating member (111) further includes a connecting via (113) that penetrates at least a part of the insulating member (111), and the first signal pattern (142-2a) forms an electrical path which goes through the first wiring layer (W1) and the connecting via (113) [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated above)]. Regarding claim 4, Lee discloses wherein the first wiring structure (W1) further includes a second signal pattern (S2) which has a path different from the first signal pattern (142-2a), is electrically connected to a second connecting pad (122) placed on the first side of the first semiconductor chip (120/121), and redistributes the second connecting pad (122) to the first connecting structure (170) [Fig. 12, annotated below]. [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (142-2a)][AltContent: textbox (S2)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (170)][AltContent: textbox (W1)][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (S2)] PNG media_image2.png 608 1018 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Lee discloses wherein the first signal pattern (142-2a) has an electrical path (113) which increases by a distance corresponding to a thickness of the insulating member (111) as compared to that of the second signal pattern (S2) [Figs. 12 (annotated above) and 14 (annotated above)]. Regarding claim 18, Lee discloses a semiconductor package comprising: a first semiconductor package, wherein the first semiconductor package includes: a first wiring structure (W1) including a first wiring layer (142), and a second wiring layer (112a) disposed on the first wiring layer (142), and connected to a first connecting structure (160/170) disposed below the first wiring layer (142) [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated above)]; a first semiconductor chip (120/121) disposed on the first wiring structure (W1) and connected to the first wiring structure (142) through a first connecting pad (122-2) disposed on a first side of the first semiconductor chip (120/121) [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated above)]; a second wiring structure [Machine English Translation, page 11: an opening (not shown)…may be formed on the sealing material 130…a separate connection terminal or the like may be connected to the opened rewiring layer 112b…]; an insulating member (111) disposed between the first and second wiring structures and including a connecting via (113) [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated below)]; wherein the first wiring structure (W1) further includes a first signal pattern (142-2a) that is electrically connected (143-2a) to the first connecting pad (122-2) [Fig. 14], the first signal pattern (142-2a) redistributes the first connecting pad (122-2) to the first connecting structure (170) via the connecting via (113) [Figs. 12 and 14 (annotated above): please note that wirings 112b/113 are embedded within insulating member 111]. However, Lee does not disclose a second semiconductor package and a second wiring structure disposed on the first semiconductor chip. Yu teaches a first semiconductor chip (100), an insulating member (222), a second wiring structure (206) disposed on the first semiconductor chip (100), and a second semiconductor package (300) disposed on the first semiconductor package; wherein the second semiconductor package (300) includes a second semiconductor chip (304) mounted on a third wiring structure (302) that is disposed on the first semiconductor package [Fig. 18A and paragraphs 0069-0070], Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, would have been motivated to modify Lee by including a second wiring structure and a second semiconductor package as taught by Yu because it helps to allow a greater degree of parallel processing capabilities [paragraph 0002]. Regarding claim 20, Lee discloses wherein the first wiring structure (W1) further includes: a second signal pattern (S2) which is electrically connected to a second connecting pad (122) disposed on the first side of the first semiconductor chip (120/121), and has a path different from that of the first signal pattern (142-2a) [Fig. 12, annotated above], and the first signal pattern (142-2a) has an electrical path which increases by a distance corresponding to a thickness of the connecting via (113), as compared with that of the second signal pattern (S2) [Figs. 12 (annotated above) and 14 (annotated above)]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11 and 14-17 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In regard to claim 11, the prior art fails to teach, disclose, or suggest, either alone or in combination, the first signal pattern redistributes the first connecting pad to the first connecting structure via the mold layer and the second wiring structure as instantly claimed, and in combination with the additional limitations. Claims 3, 6-9 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE R DIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-1727. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Jose R Diaz/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 29, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740490
MOLDED DIRECT BONDED AND INTERCONNECTED STACK
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727485
METHOD FOR FORMING ALIGNMENT KEYS OF SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE HAVING ALIGNMENT KEYS
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720813
SEMICONDUCTOR POWER DEVICE WITH IMPROVED RUGGEDNESS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12721232
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE HAVING MEMORY DEVICES STACKED IN STAIRCASE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12721138
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURES WITH THROUGH VIA
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 967 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month