Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/879,976

BUS BAR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 03, 2022
Examiner
THOMPSON, TIMOTHY J
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
3 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
232 granted / 275 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -21% lift
Without
With
+-20.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
309
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 275 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kojima(US 12,136,746) in view of Kurata (US 5,525,758) and further in view of Durse et al.(US 2023/0036434).. Regarding claim 1, Kojima discloses members made from a conductive material and consecutively arranged to form a plate shape defining a wiring pathway(fig 2); and a fused joint joining adjacent members(col 1, line 65 through col 2, line , the members include: connection members arranged at both ends of the wiring pathway and having connection portions for electrical input-output; and a conductive member arranged between the connection members. Kojima does not disclose in the members, only the connection members are plated. However, Kurata discloses the members, only the connection members are plated so as to improve reliability of connection(col 1, lines 34-45). Additionally, Durse et al. discloses the members, only the connection members are plated(para 0058). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time of the invention to have the members, only the connection members are plated as shown by Kurata and Durse et al., with the bus bar of Kojima, since as shown by Kurata and Durse et al. having only the connection members are plated is commonly done so as to so as to improve reliability of connection. Note; the limitation that the fused joint is laser fused is not given patentable weight since how the device is made is not germane to the patentability of the device itself. Regarding claim 2, Kojima discloses wherein the conductive member and at least one of the connection members are connected to each other in a state where connection surfaces of the at least one of the connection members and the conductive member located in a same plane are in contact with each other(fig 2). Regarding claim 3, Kojima discloses wherein the wiring pathway electrically connects between different battery stacks(fig 1). Claim(s) 1and 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Harris, III(US 2018/0097322) in view of Kurata (US 5,525,758) and further in view of Durse et al.(US 2023/0036434).. Regarding claim 1, Harris, III discloses members made from a conductive material and consecutively arranged to form a plate shape defining a wiring pathway(fig 1A); and a fused joint joining adjacent members(para 0038, (fig 1A, 115) , the members include: connection members arranged at both ends of the wiring pathway and having connection portions for electrical input-output(fig 1A, 107); and a conductive member arranged between the connection members(fig 1A, 110). Harris, III does not disclose in the members, only the connection members are plated. However, Kurata discloses the members, only the connection members are plated so as to improve reliability of connection(col 1, lines 34-45). Additionally, Durse et al. discloses the members, only the connection members are plated(para 0058). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time of the invention to have the members, only the connection members are plated as shown by Kurata and Durse et al., with the bus bar of Harris, III, since as shown by Kurata and Durse et al. having only the connection members are plated is commonly done so as to so as to improve reliability of connection. Note; the limitation that the fused joint is laser fused is not given patentable weight since how the device is made is not germane to the patentability of the device itself. Regarding claim 3, Harris, III discloses wherein the wiring pathway electrically connects between different battery stacks(fig 2). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Timothy J Thompson whose telephone number is (571)272-2342. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 AM-4:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY J THOMPSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 03, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 29, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 29, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603426
INTEGRATED ANTENNA STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588146
CLUSTERED MICROVIA STRUCTURE FOR A HIGH-DENSITY INTERFACE PCB
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588139
WIRING BOARD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING WIRING BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573783
Connector Cover Having Integral TPA (Terminal Position Assurance) Features
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12550246
CIRCUIT BOARD STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (-20.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 275 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month