Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/890,000

Backside Power Distribution Network and Signal Line Integration

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 17, 2022
Examiner
SLUTSKER, JULIA
Art Unit
2891
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intemational Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
808 granted / 1051 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
1105
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.4%
+7.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1051 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-17) in the reply filed on 12/05/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 18-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/05/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 7, 9-12, 14, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Chang (US 2021/0375761). Regarding claim 1, Chang discloses a semiconductor device, comprising: n-channel field-effect transistors (NFETs) and p-channel field-effect transistors (PFETs) (Fig.1) adjacent to one another on a frontside of a wafer (50)) ([0019]) ; power rails (Fig.29A, numeral 135P ([0095]), connected to source/drain regions of the NFETs (92D) and the PFETs (92A) ([0097]), present on a backside of the wafer in a space (96) between adjacent NFETs and in a space between adjacent PFETs; and a signal line (135S), connected to a gate of the NFETs and the PFETs ([0095]; Fig.31D, numeral 102); [0107]), present on the backside of the wafer in a space between an adjacent NFET and PFET ([0108]). Regarding claim 2, Chang discloses a signal line contact (Fig.31D, numeral 164) connecting the gate (102) to the signal line (135S). Regarding claim 4, Chang discloses wherein the gate (102) and the signal line contact (164) comprise a same combination of materials ([0060]; [0088]). Regarding claim 7, Chang discloses source/drain region power vias (Fig.29B; numeral 130) connecting the source/drain regions (92D) to the power rails (135P). Regarding claim 9, Chang discloses wherein the power rails (135P) and the signal line (135S) are parallel to one another on the backside of the wafer (Fig.29B). Regarding claim 10, Chang discloses wherein the NFETs are adjacent to one another on the frontside of the wafer, wherein the PFETs are adjacent to one another on the frontside of the wafer, and wherein a pair of the NFETs is adjacent to a pair of the PFETs on the frontside of the wafer (Fig.1; [0015]; [0019]). Regarding claim 11, Chang discloses a semiconductor device, comprising: n-channel field-effect transistors (NFETs) and p-channel field-effect transistors (PFETs) (Fig.1; [0015]) adjacent to one another on a frontside of a wafer (50), wherein the NFETs and the PFETs each includes a stack of active layers interconnecting source/drain regions, (92) and gates (102) surrounding at least a portion of each of the active layers in a gate-all-around configuration (Fig.1); power rails (Fig.29, numeral 135P) , connected to the source/drain regions (92A); (92D), present on a backside of the wafer in a space between adjacent NFETs and in a space between adjacent PFETs ([0094]); and a signal line (135S), connected to a given one of the gates (102), present on the backside of the wafer in a space between an adjacent NFET and PFET (Fig.31D; [0108]). Regarding claim 12, Chang discloses further comprising: a signal line contact (Fig.31D; numeral 164) connecting the given gate (102) to the signal line (135S). Regarding claim 14, Chang discloses wherein the gates (102) and the signal line contact (164) comprise a same combination of materials ([0060]; [0088]). Regarding claim 17, Chang discloses source/drain region power vias (Figs.29A, B; numeral 130) connecting the source/drain regions (92A); (92D) to the power rails 135P). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 15, and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The search of the prior art does not disclose or reasonably suggest that the gate and the signal line contact share common sidewalls as required by claims 2 and 13. The search of the prior art does not disclose or reasonably suggest that the gate and the signal line contact each comprises: a gate dielectric; at least one workfunction-setting metal disposed on the gate dielectric; and a fill metal disposed on the at least one workfunction-setting metal as required by claims 5 and 15. The search of the prior art does not disclose or reasonably suggest wherein one or more of the source/drain region powers vias comprise: a second region present alongside the source/drain regions as required by claim 8. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIA SLUTSKER whose telephone number is (571)270-3849. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9 am-6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Landau can be reached at 571-272-1731. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JULIA SLUTSKER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2891
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598971
Conductive Via With Improved Gap Filling Performance
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598880
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598969
FLEXIBLE MONOMER FOR SMOOTH POLYMER SURFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588323
NITRIDE SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE, SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING NITRIDE SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588480
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BARRIER-METAL-FREE METAL INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE, AND BARRIER-METAL-FREE METAL INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1051 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month