Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/895,773

PROVIDING REAL-TIME TRANSLATION DURING VIRTUAL CONFERENCES

Final Rejection §Other
Filed
Aug 25, 2022
Examiner
SUBRAMANI, NANDINI
Art Unit
2656
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
OA Round
3 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
55 granted / 87 resolved
+1.2% vs TC avg
Strong +49% interview lift
Without
With
+49.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 87 resolved cases

Office Action

§Other
DETAILED ACTION Introduction Claims 1-20 are pending in the application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Rejection -35 U.S.C. 185 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 185 that forms the basis for the rejection under this section made in this Office action: Notwithstanding any other provisions of law any person, and his successors, assigns, or legal representatives shall not receive a United States patent for an invention if that person, or his successors, assigns, or legal representatives shall, without procuring the license prescribed in section 184, have made, or consented to or assisted another's making, application in a foreign country for a patent or for the registration of a utility model, industrial design, or model in respect of the invention. A United States patent issued to such person, his successors, assigns, or legal representatives shall be invalid, unless the failure to procure such license was through error, and the patent does not disclose subject matter within the scope of section 181. The invention(s) disclosed in the instant application and the presently pending claims, claims 1-20, are rejected for failing to satisfy the requirements under 35 U.S.C. 184 in Applicants' petition submitted under 37 CFR 5.25, in seeking a retroactive license for foreign filing. As noted in the decision mailed by the Office on September 15, 2025, Applicants' petition under 37 CFR 1.181 did not comply with the requirements under 37 CFR 5.25(a)3(iii). In said decision, the following was stated: the following was stated: Petitioner did not provide a sufficient explanation and complete showing by which the Office could determine if the proscribed application was filed abroad though error without first obtaining the required license under 37 CFR 5.11 and pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 184 and 37 CFR 5.25(a)(3)(iii). Rather, the record supports a finding that the petitioner knowingly filed the proscribed foreign application so as to meet a time deadline with the intention of seeking a retroactive foreign filing license after the proscribed filing. This purposeful choice in this case does not suffice as an error for securing a retroactive foreign filing license. As to the proscribed patent application filed in the Singapore Patent Office on April 29, 2024, and pursuant to 37 CFR 5.25, the petition under 37 CFR 1.181 is DENIED. The Technology Center will be apprised of this decision for issuance of a final rejection under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 185. (See the decision for more details) Conclusion The above noted deficiencies cannot be rectified by filing of a continuation, an RCE (Request for Continued Examination) or other types of continuing applications as Applicants are prevented from obtaining a patent on the invention without first securing a license prior to filing the invention in another country. Claims 1-20 are rejected. No pending claims are allowed. This action is final. Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NANDINI SUBRAMANI whose telephone number is (571)272-3916. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 12:00pm - 5:00 pm EST. Any inquiry concerning the decision of Applicants' petition submitted under 35 U.S.C. 184 should be directed to Christina Tartera Donnell, Attorney Advisor, at (571) 272-3211. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bhavesh M Mehta can be reached at (571)272-7453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NANDINI SUBRAMANI/Examiner, Art Unit 2656 /BHAVESH M MEHTA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §Other
Jan 16, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §Other
Aug 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12562177
CONFERENCE ROOM SYSTEM AND AUDIO PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561629
IDENTIFYING REGULATORY DATA CORRESPONDING TO EXECUTABLE RULES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12505302
SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATING TO MINING TOPICS IN CONVERSATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12468884
Machine Learning-Based Argument Mining and Classification
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12450434
NEURAL NETWORK BASED DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE RELEVANT FOR ANSWERING NATURAL LANGUAGE QUESTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+49.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 87 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month