Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/907,053

PLATING APPARATUS AND PLATING METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 22, 2022
Priority
Mar 23, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2020080622
Examiner
WITTENBERG, STEFANIE S
Art Unit
1795
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Acm Research (Shanghai) Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
363 granted / 671 resolved
-10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
731
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
84.6%
+44.6% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 671 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims Claims 1-4, 6-29 and 31-40 are pending. Claims 27-29 and 31-40 are withdrawn from consideration. Claims 5 and 30 are cancelled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Objections and Rejections The previous objection to claim 15 is withdrawn in view of Applicant’s amendment. All other rejections from the previous Office action are withdrawn in view of Applicant’s amendment. New grounds of rejection are necessitated by amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-4 and 6-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1, the phrase “a controller…the controller configured to control; the pipeline to supply the electrolyte…substrate with a flow rate V2” contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The instant specification includes a controller [0009] configured to control the rotating actuator…[0009]…connecting to the rotating actuator…controls the rotation speed [0081]…control the rotating actuator [0082]. The specification does not support the phrasing that the controller is controlling the pipeline to supply the electrolyte. The original specification includes the pipeline [0030]…connected to the tank [0033]. There does not appear to be any disclosure connecting the controller to the pipeline to supply the electrolyte as claimed. The specification does state that rotating of the actuator can generate liquid motion [0082], however the disclosure does not sufficiently support the claimed phrasing. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 23 December 2025 have been fully considered. The remarks on pages 8-11 are directed towards the previous grounds of rejection which have been withdrawn in view of Applicant’s amendment and therefore will not be specifically addressed at this time. New grounds of rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) are presented above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 7,947,161 – vibrating of workpiece US 2021/0102307 US 8,329,006 – frequency of vibration US 6,610,189 – flow of electrolyte; movement of substrate US 2001/0040100 – flow direction; center to edge US 2020/0048786 US 2015/0345039 – oscillating substrate US 2008/0035475 – flow of electrolyte; controller Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEFANIE S WITTENBERG whose telephone number is (571)270-7594. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:00 am -4:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Luan Van can be reached at (571) 272-8521. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Stefanie S Wittenberg/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 23, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640360
SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING LITHIUM METAL BATTERIES
1y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630939
PLATING METHOD AND PLATING APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630938
SHIELD BODY SYSTEM FOR A PROCESS FLUID FOR CHEMICAL AND/OR ELECTROLYTIC SURFACE TREATMENT OF A SUBSTRATE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624471
ALUMINUM MEMBER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624472
PLATING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+18.9%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 671 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month