Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/912,409

Paste

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Examiner
CAI, JIAJIA JANIE
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Valqua, LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
24%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
41%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

24%
Career Allow Rate
9 granted / 37 resolved
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
49 pending
86
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
54.0%
+14.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is responsive to Applicant's preliminary amendments filed 09/16/2022. Claims 1-5 are currently pending and under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Corveleyn (US 2016/0145433 A1, hereinafter Corveleyn). Regarding claim 1, Corveleyn teaches a curable composition comprising a fluoropolyether, a polysiloxane, and a free-radical curing system ([0006]-[0011]). Corveleyn teaches that the fluoropolyether comprising perfluoroalkylenoxy groups (i.e., monomeric units) selected from —C4F8O— (linear or branched), —C3F6O— (linear or branched), —C2F4O—, —CF2O—, and combinations thereof ([0007]-[0008], [0027]); and at least one free-radically reactive functional group which can comprise monovalent free-radically polymerizable ethylenically-unsaturated organic groups ([0009]). Corveleyn teaches that the monovalent free-radically polymerizable ethylenically-unsaturated organic group includes —CH═CH2 (i.e., vinyl) ([0031]-[0032]). Corveleyn teaches that an example of fluoropolyether includes CH2═CHC(═O)OCH2CF2O(CF2O)9-11(CF2CF2O)9-11CF2CH2OC(═O)CH═CH2 ([0132], PFE-2), and CH2═CHC(═O)OCH2CF(CF3)O[CF2CF(CF3)O]nC4F8O[CF(CF3)CF2O]nCF(CF3)—CH2OC(═O)CH═CH2 ([0134], PFE-3), which reads on the claimed perfluoropolyether (A) having two or more ethylenically unsaturated bonds in the molecule. Corveleyn also teaches the polysiloxane comprising at least one free-radically reactive functional group which can comprise monovalent free-radically polymerizable ethylenically-unsaturated organic groups ([0010]). Corveleyn teaches that the polysiloxane includes di(vinyl-terminated) polysiloxanes ([0055]), which reads on the claimed polysiloxane (B) having two or more ethylenically unsaturated bonds in the molecule. Corveleyn teaches that the free-radical curing system comprises a free-radical initiator such as a peroxide ([0063]), which reads on the claimed radical initiator (C). Corveleyn also teaches that the curable composition is paste ([0068]). Corveleyn further teaches that the curable composition is cured to make a fluoropolyether-polysiloxane elastomer (abstract), the fluoropolyether-polysiloxane elastomer has low glass transition temperatures and has sufficient mechanical strength to be used in the preparation of shaped articles ([0021]), and the fluoropolyether-polysiloxane elastomer has high chemical resistance ([0022]). Corveleyn does not teach a single embodiment with all the claimed elements together. However, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the curable composition as a paste comprising a fluoropolyether such as a di(vinyl-terminated) perfluoropolyether, a polysiloxane such as a di(vinyl-terminated) polysiloxane, and a free-radical initiator as taught by Corveleyn, in order to make a cured product (i.e. a fluoropolyether-polysiloxane elastomer) having low glass transition temperature and sufficient mechanical strength to be used in the preparation of shaped articles, and having high chemical resistance with a reasonable expectation of success. Therefore, the invention as a whole would be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art. Regarding claim 2, Corveleyn teaches that the curable composition comprising 10 to 90 weight percent of the fluoropolyether, and 90 to 10 weight percent of the polysiloxane based on a total weight of the curable composition ([0111]-[0113]). Thus, the fluoropolyether of Corveleyn is in an amount of 10 to 90 weight percent with respect to a total 100% by weight of the amount of the fluoropolyether and the polysiloxane, which overlaps with the claimed range of “30 to 96% by mass”. Regarding claim 3, Corveleyn teaches that the curable composition further comprises a coagent, wherein the coagent comprises at least two functional organic groups which can comprise monovalent free-radically polymerizable ethylenically-unsaturated organic groups ([0095]). Corveleyn also teaches that the coagent is preferably triallyl isocyanurate ([0066]), which reads on the claimed compound (D) having two or more ethylenically unsaturated bonds in the molecule, and the claimed compound (D) being other than the perfluoropolyether (A) and the polysiloxane (B). Regarding claim 4, the instant invention discloses that thermally conductive filler (E) includes silicon oxide (SiO2) and/or carbon nanotube (instant [0071]). Corveleyn teaches that the curable composition further comprises at least one filler ([0068]), wherein the filler includes silica (i.e. silicon oxide) ([0071]), and/or carbon nanotube ([0074]), which reads on the claimed thermally conductive filler (E). Regarding claim 5, Corveleyn teaches that the curable composition is a paste and has a viscosity of from 2,000 to 50,000 mPa·sec at 25°C with a Brookfield viscometer ([0068]), equaling to 2 to 50 Pa·sec, which falls within the claimed range of “500 Pa·s or less”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIAJIA JANIE CAI whose telephone number is 571-270-0951. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner' s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached on 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIAJIA JANIE CAI/Examiner, Art Unit 1761 /MATTHEW R DIAZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12534654
COMPOSITION INCLUDING 1,1,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (HFC-143)
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12531242
DOPED LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE ENCAPSULATED IN LIGAND, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12516232
CURED MATERIAL OF THERMAL CONDUCTIVE SILICONE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12459892
ORGANIC COMPOUND, LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND LIGHTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 04, 2025
Patent 12331241
HEAT TRANSFER MIXTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 17, 2025

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
24%
Grant Probability
41%
With Interview (+16.8%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 37 resolved cases by this examiner