Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/913,762

CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 22, 2022
Examiner
MILLER, DANIEL H
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Quantum Conductors Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 2m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
367 granted / 687 resolved
-11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
717
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.2%
+26.2% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 59-78 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2013/127444 in view of WO 2014/189546. WO 2013/127444 teaches a metal foil and roiled into a tube or rod shape and pressed (or compressed) into sheets then directly grown on CNT (See [0027-0028]). The resulting sheet can then be rolled again [0027]. The tube can be aluminum (See [0027]). WO 2013 is considered to render obvious the claimed structures and manipulating the foil to form voids and/or patterned structures as claimed using known techniques absent a showing of unexpected results. The foil and CNT can be folded into random shapes to form a labyrinth of shapes (see [0030], and figure 3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to provide claimed shaping dependent upon the desired usage. Regarding claim 66, the rolled precursor can be rolled up (See figures). Regarding claims to optional features, such as in claim 67, these features are not required. Regarding claim 69, the method ids direct growth of CNTs as claimed (See [0025-0026]). WO 2014/189546 teaches structures suitably include an elongate substrate (e.g., a wire) surmounted by a coating comprising carbon nanotubes, the elongate substrate having a major axis, and at least a portion of the carbon nanotubes of the coating being aligned with the major axis [0004]. Some of the limitations of the claims may not be taught above. WO 2014/189546 teaches coating the CNT with a metal coating particulate (see claims). While (2013) teaches electroplating to produce CNT coating wherein gold is a carrier. Therefore, the multiple coatings should be obvious to provide as claimed in claim 70. Regarding claim 72, the material is necessarily a conductive element as claimed. Regarding claim 73, the article is roiled (See claims and figures). Regarding claim 75, the article is compressed as above. Regarding claims 76-78, both the primary reference and WO 2014/189546 teaches the carbon nanotubes can be multi-walled carbon nanotubes (See claims). It would have been obvious to provide the claimed CNTs to grow CNTs on a metal foil or wire. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The current rejection is a 103 over 2013/127444 in view of WO 2014/189546. Applicant has argued that the CNTs grown on the walls of the openings is not taught. The Examiner disagrees. The Examiner notes that the claim 59 and it’s dependents are to products not a process and therefore how the openings are formed or how CNTs are formed there is not relevant to the patentability wherein the structure is otherwise taught. However, even method claim 68 and its dependents do not require an order of formation. WO 2013/127444 teaches a metal foil and roiled into a tube or rod shape and pressed (or compressed) into sheets then directly grown on CNT (See [0027-0028]). The resulting sheet can then be rolled again [0027]. The tube can be aluminum (See [0027]). WO 2013 is considered to render obvious the claimed structures and manipulating the foil to form voids and/or patterned structures as claimed using known techniques absent a showing of unexpected results. Rejection maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL H MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-1534. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Veronica Ewald can be reached at 571-272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL H MILLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594579
ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIER COATING AND METHOD OF REPAIRING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577023
Recyclable paper packaging with high barrier to water vapor and oxygen
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571129
TWO-DIMENSIONAL VERTICAL COMPOSITE LAMINATE INCLUDING GRAPHENE AND HEXAGONAL BORON NITRIDE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12540105
HIGH TEMPERATURE COATINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12534639
MICHAEL ADDITION CURABLE COMPOSITION, COATING COMPOSITION CONTAINING THE SAME, AND COATED ARTICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+19.3%)
4y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month