Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Quantum Conductors Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and are located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that while different individuals are reviewing the applications, they are both within the same technical group.
NGUYEN, TRI V is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action. With 2 total pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is split. The fact that both actions are in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's chemistry and materials innovations are focused on a specific technical field. This allows the company to interact with 2 different examiners who are both part of the same specialized group at the patent office, which may lead to more consistent technical feedback across the 2 pending matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, TRI V | 1 | 67.6% | +57.2% |
| EWALD, MARIA VERONICA | 1 | 58.4% | +6.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19212087 | CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT | NGUYEN, TRI V | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19212087 | CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT | NGUYEN, TRI V | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19212087 | CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT | NGUYEN, TRI V | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 19, 2025 |
| 17913762 | CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT | EWALD, MARIA VERONICA | 1783 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Sep 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial