Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/919,817

METHOD FOR COATING A COMPACTED POWDER CAKE, IN PARTICULAR FOR PRODUCING A CAPSULE CONTAINING BEVERAGE POWDER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 19, 2022
Priority
Apr 20, 2020 — EU 20170381.6 +1 more
Examiner
WALTERS JR, ROBERT S
Art Unit
1717
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Swiss Coffee Innovation AG
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allowance Rate
565 granted / 1099 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
74 currently pending
Career history
1173
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
75.1%
+35.1% vs TC avg
§102
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1099 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Application Claims 1-19 are pending and presented for examination. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 5/15/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-19 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 1. Claims 1-19 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 newly recites “providing a shape-defining container”. However, the original disclosure fails to support this new limitation. A thorough search of the disclosure failed to return the term “shape-defining”. Additionally, this feature is not inherently shown in Applicant’s disclosure and the sections referenced by Applicant to support this feature only supports that the cavity of the container is preferably spherical when the powder compact is spherical. However, this does not support the more narrow language that the container actually defines the shape of the resultant product. Therefore, claim 1 fails to comply with the written description requirement. Claims 2-19 depend from claim 1 and fail to comply with the written description requirement for the same reasons. Conclusion Claims 1-19 are pending. Claims 1-19 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT S WALTERS JR whose telephone number is (571)270-5351. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dah-Wei Yuan can be reached at 571-272-1295. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT S WALTERS JR/ May 31, 2026Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1717
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Sep 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679981
ADHESION PROMOTER COMPOSITIONS TO ELIMINATE SUBSTRATE PREPARATION AND METHODS FOR THE SAME
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680162
CVD DEVICE PUMPING LINER
3y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680158
SELECTIVE COBALT DEPOSITION ON COPPER SURFACES
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668875
ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION METHOD OF METAL (II), (0), OR (IV) CONTAINING FILM LAYER
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662738
COMPOSITION FOR DEPOSITING A PALLADIUM COATING ON A SUBSTRATE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+50.4%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1099 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month